Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 Oct;18(4):e13408. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13408. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
Community health workers (CHWs) increasingly provide interpersonal counselling to childbearing women and their families to improve adoption of recommended maternal and child nutrition behaviours. Little is known about CHWs' first-hand experiences garnering family support for improving maternal nutrition and breastfeeding practices in low-resource settings. Using focused ethnography, we drew insights from the strategies that CHWs used to persuade influential family members to support recommendations on maternal diet, rest and breastfeeding in a behaviour change communication trial in rural Bangladesh. We interviewed 35 CHWs providing at-home interpersonal counselling to pregnant women and their families in seven 'Alive & Thrive' intervention sites. In-depth probing focused on how CHWs addressed lack of family support. Thematic coding based on Fisher's narrative paradigm revealed strategic use of three rhetorical principles by CHWs: ethos (credibility), pathos (emotion) and logos (logic). CHWs reported selectively targeting pregnant women, husbands and mothers-in-law based on their influence on behavioural adoption. Key motivators to support recommended behaviours were improved foetal growth and child intelligence. Improved maternal health was the least motivating outcome, even among mothers. Logically coherent messaging resonated well with husbands, while empathetic counselling was additionally required for mothers. Mothers-in-law were most intransigent, but were persuaded via emotional appeals. Persuasion on maternal rest was most effort-intensive, resulting in contextually appealing but scientifically inaccurate messaging. Our study demonstrates that CHWs can offer important insights on context-relevant, feasible strategies to improve family support and uptake of nutrition recommendations. It also identifies the need for focused CHW training and monitoring to address scientifically flawed counselling narratives.
社区卫生工作者(CHW)越来越多地为产妇及其家庭提供人际咨询,以改善推荐的母婴营养行为的采用率。关于 CHW 在资源匮乏的环境中为改善孕产妇营养和母乳喂养实践获得家庭支持的第一手经验,知之甚少。我们采用聚焦民族志,从 CHW 在孟加拉国农村地区的一项行为改变传播试验中使用的策略中汲取了见解,这些策略用于说服有影响力的家庭成员支持关于孕产妇饮食、休息和母乳喂养的建议。我们采访了 35 名在七个“Alive & Thrive”干预点为孕妇及其家庭提供家庭人际咨询的 CHW。深入探究的重点是 CHW 如何解决缺乏家庭支持的问题。基于 Fisher 的叙事范式的主题编码揭示了 CHW 策略性地使用了三种修辞原则:ethos(可信度)、pathos(情感)和 logos(逻辑)。CHW 报告说,根据他们对行为采用的影响,有选择地针对孕妇、丈夫和婆婆。支持推荐行为的主要动机是改善胎儿生长和儿童智力。即使在母亲中,改善孕产妇健康也是最没有动力的结果。逻辑一致的信息与丈夫产生共鸣良好,而对于母亲则需要额外的同理心咨询。婆婆最固执,但通过情感诉求被说服。关于产妇休息的劝说最费力,导致了在语境上有吸引力但在科学上不准确的信息。我们的研究表明,CHW 可以提供有关改善家庭支持和采纳营养建议的相关、可行策略的重要见解。它还确定了需要对 CHW 进行有针对性的培训和监测,以解决在科学上有缺陷的咨询叙述。