Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoinn Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Otsu City Hospital, Shiga, Japan.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Sep;164(9):2309-2316. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05313-8. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
In deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD), the clinical outcome largely depends on the appropriate position of the electrode implanted in the targeted structure. In intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CT) performed for the evaluation of the electrode position, the metal artifact induced by the implanted electrode can prevent the precise localization of the electrode. Metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques have been recently developed that can dramatically improve the visualization of objects by reducing metal artifacts after performing cone-beam CT. Hence, in this case series, we attempted to clarify the usefulness and accuracy of intraoperative cone-beam CT with MAR (intraCBCTwM) by comparing with both intraoperative cone-beam CT without MAR (intraCBCTwoM) and conventional postoperative CT (post-CT) for the assessment of the implanted electrode position and the intracranial structures during DBS procedures.
Between November 2019 and December 2020, 10 patients with PD who underwent DBS at our institution were recruited, and the images of 9 patients (bilateral: n = 8, unilateral: n = 1) were analyzed. The artifact index (AI) in intraCBCTwM or intraCBCTwoM, and conventional post-CT were retrospectively assessed using the standard deviation of the region-of-interest around the implanted electrodes and background noise. Additionally, the Euclidean distances gap of electrode tip based on post-CT in each fusion image was compared between intraCBCTwM and intraCBCTwoM.
The AI was significantly lower in intraCBCTwM than in intraCBCTwoM (P < 0.01). The mean Euclidean distance between the tip of the electrode in intraCBCTwM and in post-CT was significantly shorter compared to that in intraCBCTwoM (P < 0.05).
The results reported here suggest that intraCBCTwM is a more useful and accurate method than intraCBCTwoM to assess the implanted electrode position and intracranial structures during DBS.
在深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗帕金森病(PD)中,临床疗效在很大程度上取决于植入目标结构内的电极的适当位置。在用于评估电极位置的术中锥形束 CT(CBCT)中,植入的电极产生的金属伪影会妨碍对电极的准确定位。最近开发了金属伪影减少(MAR)技术,通过在进行锥形束 CT 后减少金属伪影,可以显著改善物体的可视化效果。因此,在本病例系列研究中,我们通过比较 MAR 辅助的术中锥形束 CT(intraCBCTwM)与无 MAR 的术中锥形束 CT(intraCBCTwoM)和常规术后 CT(post-CT),尝试明确 MAR 辅助的术中锥形束 CT (intraCBCTwM)在评估 DBS 手术中植入电极位置和颅内结构中的作用和准确性。
2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 12 月,我们机构招募了 10 例接受 DBS 的 PD 患者,分析了 9 例患者(双侧:n=8,单侧:n=1)的图像。使用植入电极周围感兴趣区域的标准偏差和背景噪声来回顾性评估 intraCBCTwM 或 intraCBCTwoM 中的伪影指数(AI)和常规 post-CT。此外,比较了基于 post-CT 在每个融合图像中电极尖端的欧几里得距离差距 intraCBCTwM 和 intraCBCTwoM 之间的差异。
intraCBCTwM 的 AI 明显低于 intraCBCTwoM(P<0.01)。与 intraCBCTwoM 相比,intraCBCTwM 中电极尖端的平均欧几里得距离明显更短(P<0.05)。
本研究结果表明,与 intraCBCTwoM 相比,intraCBCTwM 是一种更有用和准确的方法,可用于评估 DBS 期间植入电极的位置和颅内结构。