• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合化学和电化学去污处理对污染愈合基台的效果及其对表面形貌的影响:一项体外研究。

Efficacy of combined chemical and electrochemical decontamination treatments on contaminated healing abutments and their effect on surface topography: An in vitro study.

机构信息

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Prosthodontic Dentistry Department, Division of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, King Salman International University, South Sinai, Egypt.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Oct;24(5):696-708. doi: 10.1111/cid.13123. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1111/cid.13123
PMID:35852825
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of four decontamination protocols on contaminated healing abutments (HAs) and their effects on surface topography.

METHODS

Eighty contaminated single-use HA samples collected from human participants were stained with phloxine B and examined microscopically. The retrieved HAs were randomly divided into four test groups: (1) Autoclaving only (AU), (2) 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) + AU, (3) Electrochemical treatment (EC) + AU, (4) NaOCl + EC + AU, and positive control (contaminated without any treatment). Four new unused HAs served as negative controls (NC). The surface features were analyzed using stereo microscopy (SM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and optical profilometry.

RESULTS

The lowest decontamination efficacy was observed for the AU group. The NaOCl + AU and EC + AU groups effectively removed residual contamination, whereas EC + AU showed better decontamination results than NaOCl + AU. SM, SEM, and EDS analyses revealed the best decontamination efficacy in the combined NaOCl + EC + AU group compared to the other groups. Surface roughness (Sa), developed surface area ratio (Sdr), and texture-aspect ratio (Str) in AU, NaOCl + AU, EC + AU, and NaOCl + EC + AU groups were not statistically significant compared to the NC group.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of NaOCl with subsequent EC can remove soft and hard deposits from the surface of HAs compared to NaOCl alone and EC alone, without altering the surface topography of HAs.

摘要

目的

评估四种消毒方案对污染愈合基台(HA)的效果及其对表面形貌的影响。

方法

从人类参与者中收集了 80 个受污染的一次性 HA 样本,并用 phloxine B 染色,然后在显微镜下进行检查。回收的 HA 被随机分为四组测试:(1)仅高压灭菌(AU);(2)5.25%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)+AU;(3)电化学处理(EC)+AU;(4)NaOCl + EC + AU,以及阳性对照(未经任何处理而污染)。四个新的未使用的 HA 作为阴性对照(NC)。使用立体显微镜(SM)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、能谱仪(EDS)和光学轮廓仪分析表面特征。

结果

AU 组的去污效果最低。NaOCl + AU 和 EC + AU 组有效去除了残留的污染,而 EC + AU 组的去污效果优于 NaOCl + AU 组。SM、SEM 和 EDS 分析表明,与其他组相比,组合 NaOCl + EC + AU 组的去污效果最佳。AU、NaOCl + AU、EC + AU 和 NaOCl + EC + AU 组的表面粗糙度(Sa)、发展表面面积比(Sdr)和纹理-形貌比(Str)与 NC 组相比没有统计学意义。

结论

与单独使用 NaOCl 或 EC 相比,NaOCl 与随后的 EC 联合使用可以去除 HA 表面的软、硬沉积物,而不会改变 HA 的表面形貌。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of combined chemical and electrochemical decontamination treatments on contaminated healing abutments and their effect on surface topography: An in vitro study.联合化学和电化学去污处理对污染愈合基台的效果及其对表面形貌的影响:一项体外研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Oct;24(5):696-708. doi: 10.1111/cid.13123. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
2
Effect of chemical and electrochemical decontamination protocols on single and multiple-used healing abutments: A comparative analysis of contact surface area, micro-gap, micro-leakage, and surface topography.化学和电化学消毒方案对单/多次使用愈合基台的影响:接触面积、微间隙、微渗漏和表面形貌的对比分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Dec;25(6):1207-1215. doi: 10.1111/cid.13269. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
An In Vitro Analysis of Sodium Hypochlorite Decontamination for the Reuse of Implant Healing Abutments.体外分析次氯酸钠对种植体愈合基台再利用的消毒效果
J Oral Implantol. 2021 Aug 1;47(4):271-279. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00273.
4
Reusing Titanium Healing Abutments: Comparison of Two Decontamination Methods.钛愈合基台的再利用:两种去污方法的比较。
Int J Prosthodont. 2018 November/December;31(6):613–618. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5881. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
5
Investigation of different electrochemical cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments in vitro: an approach for metal surface decontamination.体外不同电化学清洗方法对污染愈合基台的研究:一种金属表面去污方法
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Nov 8;6(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00265-z.
6
Biocompatibility, Surface Morphology, and Bacterial Load of Dental Implant Abutments following Decontamination Protocols: An In-Vitro Study.去污方案后牙种植基台的生物相容性、表面形态及细菌载量:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 May 30;16(11):4080. doi: 10.3390/ma16114080.
7
Disinfection and surface changes of gutta-percha cones after immersion in sodium hypochlorite solution containing surfactant.在含有表面活性剂的次氯酸钠溶液中浸泡后,牙胶尖的消毒和表面变化。
Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Aug;82(8):1290-1296. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23279. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
8
Evaluation of residual contamination on healing abutments after cleaning with a protein-denaturing agent and detergent.使用蛋白质变性剂和洗涤剂清洁后愈合基台上残留污染物的评估。
Quintessence Int. 2020;51(6):474-485. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a44546.
9
[The effect of different kinds and concentrations of disinfectants on decontamination of healing abutments].[不同种类及浓度的消毒剂对愈合基台去污效果的影响]
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2022 Mar;129(3):137-141. doi: 10.5177/ntvt.2022.03.21114.
10
Effect of deproteinization before and after acid etching on the surface roughness of immature permanent enamel.酸蚀前后脱蛋白处理对未成熟恒牙釉质表面粗糙度的影响。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 May;21(5):591-596. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_166_17.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of four decontamination procedures in Reusing healing abutments: An in vitro study.愈合基台再利用中四种去污程序的比较:一项体外研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Aug;36(8):1141-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.013. Epub 2024 Jun 14.