Department of Audiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Audiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Sep;160:111243. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111243. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
To assess the quality of life (QoL) in child and adolescent cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations (IEM) and to compare their outcomes to their cochlear implant using peers with normal inner ear structures.
The present sample consisted of 100 children (45 with IEM, 55 without IEM) and 100 adolescents (46 with IEM, 54 without IEM). The following QoL questionnaires were used to assess the hearing-related QoL: The Hearing Environments and Reflection on Quality of Life 26 (HEAR-QL-26 for children between 7 and 12 years of age) and HEAR-QL-28 (for adolescents between 13 and 18 years of age). Both questionnaires were based on a 5-points Likert scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating a better perception of QoL. The scores were converted to percentage values (never = 100, almost never = 75, sometimes = 50, often = 25, almost always = 0).
For the patients with IEM, mean scores from the HEAR-QL-26 and HEAR-QL-28 were 50.4 (SD = 18.9) and 54.5 (SD = 19.6), respectively. For the patients without IEM, mean scores from the HEAR-QL-26 and HEAR-QL-28 were 72.7 (SD = 18.0) and 65.0 (SD = 19.1), respectively. For both child and adolescent subgroups, statistically significant differences were observed between QoL scores from patients with and without IEM (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant effects of the malformation type on the QoL findings (p ≥ 0.05).
Child and adolescent cochlear implant users with IEM had significantly lower scores on validated HEAR-QL versions in comparison to their implanted peers without IEM.
评估内耳畸形(IEM)儿童和青少年人工耳蜗植入者的生活质量(QoL),并将其与具有正常内耳结构的人工耳蜗植入者的结果进行比较。
本研究样本包括 100 名儿童(45 名 IEM,55 名无 IEM)和 100 名青少年(46 名 IEM,54 名无 IEM)。使用以下 QoL 问卷评估听力相关 QoL:7-12 岁儿童使用的听力环境和生活质量反映量表 26(HEAR-QL-26)和 13-18 岁青少年使用的 HEAR-QL-28。两个问卷均基于 5 分制,从 0 到 4 分,得分越高表示 QoL 感知越好。得分转换为百分比值(从不=100,几乎从不=75,有时=50,经常=25,几乎总是=0)。
对于 IEM 患者,HEAR-QL-26 和 HEAR-QL-28 的平均得分分别为 50.4(标准差 [SD]=18.9)和 54.5(SD=19.6)。对于无 IEM 患者,HEAR-QL-26 和 HEAR-QL-28 的平均得分分别为 72.7(SD=18.0)和 65.0(SD=19.1)。对于儿童和青少年亚组,有 IEM 和无 IEM 患者的 QoL 评分之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。畸形类型对 QoL 结果没有统计学显著影响(p≥0.05)。
与无 IEM 的植入同龄人相比,有 IEM 的儿童和青少年人工耳蜗植入者在经过验证的 HEAR-QL 版本上的得分明显较低。