Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Nov;64(5):544-556. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.07.008. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
The role of antithrombotic therapy in the management of aortic and peripheral aneurysms is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of antithrombotics on clinical outcomes for aortic and peripheral aneurysms.
Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies investigating the effect of antithrombotic therapy on clinical outcomes for patients with any aortic or peripheral artery aneurysm were included.
Fifty-nine studies (28 with antiplatelet agents, 12 anticoagulants, two intra-operative heparin, and 16 any antithrombotic agent) involving 122 102 patients were included. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth rate was not significantly associated with the use of antiplatelet therapy (SMD -0.36 mm/year; 95% CI -0.75 - 0.02; p = .060; GRADE certainty: very low). Antithrombotics were associated with increased 30 day mortality for patients with AAAs undergoing intervention (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.51 - 3.51; p < .001; GRADE certainty: low). Following intervention, antiplatelet therapy was associated with reduced long term all cause mortality (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.76 - 0.92; p < .001; GRADE certainty: moderate), whilst anticoagulants were associated with increased all cause mortality (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.14 - 2.37; p = .008; GRADE certainty: very low), endoleak within three years (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.10 - 3.60; p = .020; I = 60%; GRADE certainty: very low), and an increased re-intervention rate at one year (OR 3.25; 95% CI 1.82 - 5.82; p < .001; I = 35%; GRADE certainty: moderate). Five studies examined antithrombotic therapy for popliteal aneurysms. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity.
There was a lack of high quality data examining antithrombotic therapy for patients with aneurysms. Antiplatelet therapy was associated with a reduction in post-intervention all cause mortality for AAA, whilst anticoagulants were associated with an increased risk of all cause mortality, endoleak, and re-intervention. Large, well designed trials are still required to determine the therapeutic benefits of antithrombotic agents in this setting.
抗血栓治疗在主动脉瘤和外周动脉瘤管理中的作用尚不清楚。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估抗血栓药物对主动脉瘤和外周动脉瘤患者临床结局的影响。
检索了 Medline、Embase 和 CENTRAL 数据库。纳入了评估抗血栓治疗对任何主动脉或外周动脉动脉瘤患者临床结局影响的随机对照试验和观察性研究。
共纳入 59 项研究(28 项抗血小板治疗、12 项抗凝治疗、2 项术中肝素、16 项任何抗血栓治疗),涉及 122102 例患者。腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的生长速度与抗血小板治疗无显著相关性(SMD -0.36 mm/年;95%CI -0.75 - 0.02;p=0.060;GRADE 确定性:极低)。抗血栓治疗与接受介入治疗的 AAA 患者 30 天死亡率升高相关(OR 2.30;95%CI 1.51 - 3.51;p<0.001;GRADE 确定性:低)。介入治疗后,抗血小板治疗与长期全因死亡率降低相关(HR 0.84;95%CI 0.76 - 0.92;p<0.001;GRADE 确定性:中),而抗凝剂与全因死亡率升高相关(HR 1.64;95%CI 1.14 - 2.37;p=0.008;GRADE 确定性:极低)、三年内内漏(OR 1.99;95%CI 1.10 - 3.60;p=0.020;I=60%;GRADE 确定性:极低)和一年时再介入率升高(OR 3.25;95%CI 1.82 - 5.82;p<0.001;I=35%;GRADE 确定性:中)。有 5 项研究评估了抗血栓治疗对腘动脉瘤的疗效。由于存在异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。
目前缺乏高质量的数据来评估抗血栓治疗对动脉瘤患者的疗效。抗血小板治疗与 AAA 介入治疗后全因死亡率降低相关,而抗凝剂与全因死亡率升高、内漏和再介入风险增加相关。仍需要进行大型、精心设计的试验来确定抗血栓药物在这一领域的治疗获益。