Suppr超能文献

冲击波疗法与干针疗法治疗髂胫束综合征的随机临床试验:冲击波疗法与干针疗法治疗髂胫束综合征的比较

Shockwave Therapy Versus Dry Needling for the Management of Iliotibial Band Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial: SWT Vs. DN for the Treatment of ITBS.

作者信息

Razie Maghroori, Leila Karshenas, Saied Khosrawi

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Galen Med J. 2021 Jul 6;10:1-8. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v10i0.2174. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS) is a common leading cause of lateral knee pain. Despite varieties of medical and non-medical treatments proposed for the management of ITBS, the best therapeutic approach for its treatment remained a significant question. The current study aims to compare the outcomes of dry needling (DN) versus shockwave therapy (SWT) in the management of ITBS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 40 patients diagnosed with ITBS. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups of DN (n=20) and SWT (n=20). Visual analog scale for the pain assessment, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) for the function evaluation, and length of the iliotibial band were assessed at baseline, immediately after the cessation of the intervention, and within four weeks.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar regarding demographic characteristics (P0.05). Both approaches could efficiently lead to improved pain (P0.001) and promoted function based on LEFS (P0.001); however, iliotibial band length (ITBL) did not alter remarkably (P0.05). The groups were similar in terms of pain score, LEFS, and ITBL at all of the assessment intervals (P0.05), but the pain score within four weeks following the interventions that were significantly better in DN (P=0.023).

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, DN, as well as SWT, could remarkably lead to an improvement in pain and function among patients resenting from ITBS; however, none of the approaches was superior over the other.

摘要

背景

髂胫束综合征(ITBS)是导致膝关节外侧疼痛的常见主要原因。尽管针对ITBS的治疗提出了各种医学和非医学治疗方法,但其最佳治疗方法仍是一个重大问题。本研究旨在比较干针疗法(DN)与冲击波疗法(SWT)治疗ITBS的效果。

材料与方法

本随机临床试验对40例诊断为ITBS的患者进行。患者被随机分为两组,即DN组(n = 20)和SWT组(n = 20)。在基线、干预结束后即刻以及四周内,采用视觉模拟评分法评估疼痛,采用下肢功能量表(LEFS)评估功能,并测量髂胫束长度。

结果

两组在人口统计学特征方面相似(P>0.05)。两种方法均能有效缓解疼痛(P<0.001),并基于LEFS改善功能(P<0.001);然而,髂胫束长度(ITBL)没有显著变化(P>0.05)。在所有评估时间点,两组在疼痛评分、LEFS和ITBL方面相似(P>0.05),但干预后四周内的疼痛评分DN组明显更好(P = 0.023)。

结论

根据我们的结果,DN和SWT均能显著改善ITBS患者的疼痛和功能;然而,两种方法均不优于对方。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfd/9260514/ef9076d359e9/gmj-10-e2146-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验