• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲击波疗法与干针疗法治疗髂胫束综合征的随机临床试验:冲击波疗法与干针疗法治疗髂胫束综合征的比较

Shockwave Therapy Versus Dry Needling for the Management of Iliotibial Band Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial: SWT Vs. DN for the Treatment of ITBS.

作者信息

Razie Maghroori, Leila Karshenas, Saied Khosrawi

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Galen Med J. 2021 Jul 6;10:1-8. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v10i0.2174. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.31661/gmj.v10i0.2174
PMID:35855103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9260514/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS) is a common leading cause of lateral knee pain. Despite varieties of medical and non-medical treatments proposed for the management of ITBS, the best therapeutic approach for its treatment remained a significant question. The current study aims to compare the outcomes of dry needling (DN) versus shockwave therapy (SWT) in the management of ITBS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 40 patients diagnosed with ITBS. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups of DN (n=20) and SWT (n=20). Visual analog scale for the pain assessment, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) for the function evaluation, and length of the iliotibial band were assessed at baseline, immediately after the cessation of the intervention, and within four weeks.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar regarding demographic characteristics (P0.05). Both approaches could efficiently lead to improved pain (P0.001) and promoted function based on LEFS (P0.001); however, iliotibial band length (ITBL) did not alter remarkably (P0.05). The groups were similar in terms of pain score, LEFS, and ITBL at all of the assessment intervals (P0.05), but the pain score within four weeks following the interventions that were significantly better in DN (P=0.023).

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, DN, as well as SWT, could remarkably lead to an improvement in pain and function among patients resenting from ITBS; however, none of the approaches was superior over the other.

摘要

背景

髂胫束综合征(ITBS)是导致膝关节外侧疼痛的常见主要原因。尽管针对ITBS的治疗提出了各种医学和非医学治疗方法,但其最佳治疗方法仍是一个重大问题。本研究旨在比较干针疗法(DN)与冲击波疗法(SWT)治疗ITBS的效果。

材料与方法

本随机临床试验对40例诊断为ITBS的患者进行。患者被随机分为两组,即DN组(n = 20)和SWT组(n = 20)。在基线、干预结束后即刻以及四周内,采用视觉模拟评分法评估疼痛,采用下肢功能量表(LEFS)评估功能,并测量髂胫束长度。

结果

两组在人口统计学特征方面相似(P>0.05)。两种方法均能有效缓解疼痛(P<0.001),并基于LEFS改善功能(P<0.001);然而,髂胫束长度(ITBL)没有显著变化(P>0.05)。在所有评估时间点,两组在疼痛评分、LEFS和ITBL方面相似(P>0.05),但干预后四周内的疼痛评分DN组明显更好(P = 0.023)。

结论

根据我们的结果,DN和SWT均能显著改善ITBS患者的疼痛和功能;然而,两种方法均不优于对方。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfd/9260514/ef9076d359e9/gmj-10-e2146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfd/9260514/ef9076d359e9/gmj-10-e2146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cfd/9260514/ef9076d359e9/gmj-10-e2146-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Shockwave Therapy Versus Dry Needling for the Management of Iliotibial Band Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial: SWT Vs. DN for the Treatment of ITBS.冲击波疗法与干针疗法治疗髂胫束综合征的随机临床试验:冲击波疗法与干针疗法治疗髂胫束综合征的比较
Galen Med J. 2021 Jul 6;10:1-8. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v10i0.2174. eCollection 2021.
2
Radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with manual therapy in runners with iliotibial band syndrome.在患有髂胫束综合征的跑步者中,桡侧体外冲击波疗法与手法治疗的比较。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016;29(1):161-70. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150612.
3
The use of dry needling for a subject with chronic lateral hip and thigh pain: a case report.对一名患有慢性臀部外侧和大腿疼痛的受试者使用干针疗法:病例报告。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Apr;10(2):246-55.
4
EFFECTIVENESS OF DRY NEEDLING, STRETCHING, AND STRENGTHENING TO REDUCE PAIN AND IMPROVE FUNCTION IN SUBJECTS WITH CHRONIC LATERAL HIP AND THIGH PAIN: A RETROSPECTIVE CASE SERIES.干针疗法、拉伸和强化训练对减轻慢性髋部外侧和大腿疼痛患者疼痛及改善功能的有效性:一项回顾性病例系列研究
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Aug;10(4):540-51.
5
Stiffness of the iliotibial band and associated muscles in runner's knee: Assessing the effects of physiotherapy through ultrasound shear wave elastography.髂胫束及相关肌肉僵硬与跑步膝:超声剪切波弹性成像评估物理治疗的效果。
Phys Ther Sport. 2020 Sep;45:126-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
6
Associations between iliotibial band injury status and running biomechanics in women.女性髂胫束损伤状况与跑步生物力学之间的关联。
Gait Posture. 2015 Feb;41(2):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.01.031. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
7
Iliotibial band syndrome rehabilitation in female runners: a pilot randomized study.女性跑步者髂胫束综合征康复:一项初步随机研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 May 24;15(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01713-7.
8
Effect of running retraining on pain, function, and lower-extremity biomechanics in a female runner with iliotibial band syndrome.跑步再训练对患有髂胫束综合征的女性跑步者的疼痛、功能和下肢生物力学的影响。
J Sport Rehabil. 2014 May;23(2):145-57. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0024. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
9
Stretching and Releasing of Iliotibial Band Complex in Patients with Iliotibial Band Syndrome: A Narrative Review.髂胫束综合征患者髂胫束复合体的拉伸与松解:一项叙述性综述
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Jun 4;8(2):74. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8020074.
10
A LITERATURE REVIEW AND CLINICAL COMMENTARY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ILIOTIBIAL BAND SYNDROME IN RUNNERS.跑步者髂胫束综合征发病机制的文献综述与临床评论
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 May;15(3):460-470.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of conservative treatment strategies for iliotibial band syndrome on pain and function in runners: a systematic review.保守治疗策略对跑步者髂胫束综合征疼痛及功能的影响:一项系统评价
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Aug 23;6:1386456. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1386456. eCollection 2024.
2
Stretching and Releasing of Iliotibial Band Complex in Patients with Iliotibial Band Syndrome: A Narrative Review.髂胫束综合征患者髂胫束复合体的拉伸与松解:一项叙述性综述
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Jun 4;8(2):74. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8020074.

本文引用的文献

1
Iliotibial band syndrome.髂胫束综合征
BMJ. 2019 Mar 21;364:l980. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l980.
2
The effects of dry needling and radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy on latent trigger point sensitivity in the quadriceps: A randomised control pilot study.干针疗法和径向体外冲击波疗法对股四头肌潜在触发点敏感性的影响:一项随机对照试验性研究。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Jan;23(1):82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 11.
3
Iliotibial band friction syndrome: An original technique of digastric release of the iliotibial band from Gerdy's tubercle.
髂胫束摩擦综合征:一种从Gerdy结节处进行髂胫束二腹肌松解的原创技术。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1209-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
4
The Role of Extracorporeal Shockwave Treatment in Musculoskeletal Disorders.体外冲击波治疗在肌肉骨骼疾病中的作用
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Feb 7;100(3):251-263. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00661.
5
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Trigger Point Injection in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Quadratus Lumborum.体外冲击波疗法与触发点注射治疗腰方肌肌筋膜疼痛综合征的对比研究
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Aug;41(4):582-588. doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.4.582. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Effects of Dry Needling on Spinal Mobility and Trigger Points in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome.干针疗法对纤维肌痛综合征患者脊柱活动度和触发点的影响。
Pain Physician. 2017 Feb;20(2):37-52.
7
Iliotibial Band Syndrome in Runners: Biomechanical Implications and Exercise Interventions.跑步者的髂胫束综合征:生物力学影响与运动干预
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2016 Feb;27(1):53-77. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.08.001.
8
Biomechanical risk factors associated with iliotibial band syndrome in runners: a systematic review.跑步者中与髂胫束综合征相关的生物力学危险因素:一项系统综述。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Nov 16;16:356. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0808-7.
9
A Review of Treatments for Iliotibial Band Syndrome in the Athletic Population.运动员群体中髂胫束综合征的治疗综述
J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp). 2013;2013:367169. doi: 10.1155/2013/367169. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
10
Radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with manual therapy in runners with iliotibial band syndrome.在患有髂胫束综合征的跑步者中,桡侧体外冲击波疗法与手法治疗的比较。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016;29(1):161-70. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150612.