Nordström Peter, Ballin Marcel, Nordström Anna
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Unit of Geriatric Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Oct;21:100466. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100466. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
The effect of a fourth dose of COVID-19 vaccine on the risk of death in the oldest and frailest individuals is unknown.
Two matched cohorts were formed using Swedish nationwide registers. In the first, residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) given a fourth dose of an mRNA vaccine from 1 January 2022 onwards were matched 1:1 on birth year and county of residence to residents given at least a third dose ( = 24,524). In the second, all individuals aged ≥80 years given a fourth dose were matched 1:1 to individuals given at least a third dose ( = 394,104). Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios for all-cause mortality in fourth-dose recipients as compared with in third-dose recipients, with relative vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimated as 1 minus the hazard ratio.
From 7 days after baseline and onwards, there were 1119 deaths in the LTCF cohort during a median follow-up of 77 days and a maximum follow-up of 126 days. During days 7 to 60, the VE of the fourth dose was 39% (95% CI, 29-48), which declined to 27% (95% CI, -2-48) during days 61 to 126. In the cohort of all individuals aged ≥80 years, there were 5753 deaths during a median follow-up of 73 days and a maximum follow-up of 143 days. During days 7 to 60, the VE of the fourth dose was 71% (95% CI, 69-72), which declined to 54% (95% CI, 48-60) during days 61 to 143. The VE of the fourth dose seemed stronger when it was compared to third-dose recipients where at least four months had passed since vaccination ( < 0·001 for interaction).
As compared with a third dose, a fourth dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, administered during the Omicron era, was associated with reduced risk of death from all causes in residents of LTCFs and in the oldest old during the first two months, after which the protection became slightly lower. These findings suggest that a fourth dose may prevent premature mortality in the oldest and frailest even after the emergence of the Omicron variant, although the timing of vaccination seems to be important with respect to the slight waning observed after two months.
There was no funding source for this study.
第四剂新冠疫苗对最年长者和身体最虚弱者死亡风险的影响尚不清楚。
利用瑞典全国性登记系统组建了两个匹配队列。在第一个队列中,2022年1月1日起接种第四剂mRNA疫苗的长期护理机构(LTCF)居民,按出生年份和居住县与至少接种第三剂的居民进行1:1匹配(n = 24,524)。在第二个队列中,所有80岁及以上接种第四剂的个体与至少接种第三剂的个体进行1:1匹配(n = 394,104)。使用Cox回归模型估计第四剂接种者与第三剂接种者全因死亡率的风险比,相对疫苗效力(VE)估计为1减去风险比。
自基线后7天起,LTCF队列在中位随访77天、最长随访126天期间有1119例死亡。在第7至60天,第四剂的VE为39%(95%CI,29 - 48),在第61至126天降至27%(95%CI, - 2 - 48)。在所有80岁及以上个体的队列中,在中位随访73天、最长随访143天期间有5753例死亡。在第7至60天,第四剂的VE为71%(95%CI,69 - 72),在第61至143天降至54%(95%CI,48 - 60)。与接种第三剂后至少已过去四个月的接种者相比,第四剂的VE似乎更强(交互作用P < 0·001)。
与第三剂相比,在奥密克戎流行期间接种的第四剂mRNA新冠疫苗,在前两个月与LTCF居民和最年长者的全因死亡风险降低相关,此后保护作用略有降低。这些发现表明,即使在奥密克戎变异株出现后,第四剂疫苗也可能预防最年长者和身体最虚弱者的过早死亡,尽管就两个月后观察到的轻微减弱而言,疫苗接种时间似乎很重要。
本研究无资金来源。