Suppr超能文献

肿瘤临床医生的社交网络作为增加癌症幸存者诊所转诊的一种手段。

Social networks of oncology clinicians as a means for increasing survivorship clinic referral.

作者信息

Piombo Sarah E, Miller Kimberly A, Freyer David R, Milam Joel E, Ritt-Olson Anamara, In Gino K, Valente Thomas W

机构信息

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA.

Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA.

出版信息

Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Jul 15;2:89. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00153-0. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Specialized cancer survivorship clinics are recommended for addressing treatment-related health concerns of long-term survivors, but their relative newness in medical oncology necessitates strategies to expand services and clinic referrals. This study used social network analysis to identify personal and/or network factors associated with referral of patients to a survivorship clinic.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional social network survey of clinical personnel at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. Participants identified colleagues with whom they consult for advice (advice network) and/or discuss patient care (discussion network). Exponential random graph models and logistic regression were used to identify key opinion leaders in the network and factors associated with referral of patients to the center's survivorship clinic.

RESULTS

Here we show that of the respondents (n = 69), 78.0% report being aware of the survivorship clinic, yet only 30.4% had ever referred patients to it. Individuals tend to associate with others in the same occupational role (homophily). In the discussion network, holding an influential network position (betweenness centrality) is associated with patient referral to the survivorship clinic. In the advice network, several social workers are identified as opinion leaders.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that there is strong homophily in both networks, potentially inhibiting information sharing between groups. In designing an inclusive network intervention, persons occupying influential network positions and opinion leaders (e.g., social workers in this case) are well-positioned to promote survivorship clinic referrals.

摘要

背景

建议设立专门的癌症幸存者诊所,以解决长期幸存者与治疗相关的健康问题,但它们在医学肿瘤学领域相对较新,因此需要采取策略来扩大服务范围和诊所转诊。本研究使用社会网络分析来确定与患者转诊至幸存者诊所相关的个人和/或网络因素。

方法

我们对一家美国国立癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心的临床人员进行了一项横断面社会网络调查。参与者指出他们会与之咨询建议(建议网络)和/或讨论患者护理的同事(讨论网络)。使用指数随机图模型和逻辑回归来确定网络中的关键意见领袖以及与患者转诊至该中心幸存者诊所相关的因素。

结果

我们发现,在受访者(n = 69)中,78.0%报告知晓幸存者诊所,但只有30.4%曾将患者转诊至该诊所。个体倾向于与处于相同职业角色的其他人交往(同质性)。在讨论网络中,拥有有影响力的网络位置(中间中心性)与患者转诊至幸存者诊所相关。在建议网络中,几位社会工作者被确定为意见领袖。

结论

本研究表明,两个网络中都存在强烈的同质性,这可能会抑制群体之间的信息共享。在设计包容性网络干预措施时,占据有影响力网络位置的人员和意见领袖(如本案例中的社会工作者)非常适合促进幸存者诊所的转诊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bca/9287406/fe043fa86eec/43856_2022_153_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验