E.C. Erb is an internal medicine resident, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
M.N. Randolph is a family medicine resident, Department of Family Medicine, MedStar Health Franklin Square, Baltimore, Maryland.
Acad Med. 2022 Nov 1;97(11):1623-1627. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004882. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Medical School Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) show persistent high rates of medical student mistreatment, and multiple barriers to student reporting of mistreatment exist. The authors examined whether learning environment sessions (LESs) allow students opportunities to identify and describe patterns of mistreatment missed by other avenues of reporting.
Peer-facilitated LESs were instituted in 2018-2019 at Boston University School of Medicine. The LESs were scheduled once during every third-year core clerkship block. Third- and fourth-year students trained as peer-facilitators led discussions of topics relevant to the student clinical experience using a standardized facilitator guide. Minutes, including details of reported events, were completed during the session and visible to all students participating. These minutes were sent to clerkship leadership and the medical education office for action once student grades were submitted.
Summative content analysis was conducted on 44 LES minutes from sessions held in January-November 2019. Reported incidents were categorized into broad categories of negative treatment (NT), negative learning environment (NLE), and positive learning environment (PLE). Sixty-three instances of NT were identified. Of these, 37 fit within the scope of the AAMC GQ mistreatment categories. The remaining 26 instances of NT were classified into 7 novel categories of medical student mistreatment. Instances of NLE were most discussed by students and categorized into 5 subthemes. Examples of PLE were categorized into 4 subthemes, which encompassed 11 descriptors of core qualities of an ideal preceptor or educational environment.
LESs have aided in identifying and describing new patterns of mistreatment. They fulfill a unique role by allowing students to identify, analyze, and report mistreatment in a facilitated and protected space. Formal evaluations of institutional improvement in the learning environment, reduction in medical student mistreatment, and subsequent improvement in AAMC GQ data are needed.
美国医学院协会(AAMC)医学毕业生问卷调查(GQ)的数据显示,医学生受虐待的情况仍然很高,而且学生报告虐待的障碍很多。作者研究了学习环境课程(LES)是否为学生提供了机会,以识别和描述其他报告途径错过的虐待模式。
2018-2019 年,波士顿大学医学院开设了以同伴为基础的 LES。这些 LES 每三个三年级核心实习块安排一次。经过培训的第三年和第四年学生作为同伴促进者,使用标准化的促进者指南,讨论与学生临床经验相关的主题。会议期间完成记录会议细节的纪要,所有参加会议的学生都可以看到。一旦学生提交成绩,这些纪要就会被送到实习领导和医学教育办公室采取行动。
对 2019 年 1 月至 11 月举行的 44 次 LES 会议的纪要进行了总结性内容分析。报告的事件被分为负面治疗(NT)、负面学习环境(NLE)和正面学习环境(PLE)三个大类。确定了 63 起 NT 事件。其中 37 起符合 AAMC GQ 虐待类别的范围。其余 26 起 NT 事件被归入 7 种新的医学生虐待类别。学生讨论最多的是 NLE,并将其分为 5 个子主题。PLE 被归入 4 个子主题,其中包括理想导师或教育环境的核心素质的 11 个描述符。
LES 有助于识别和描述新的虐待模式。它们通过允许学生在一个促进和保护的空间中识别、分析和报告虐待,发挥了独特的作用。需要对机构学习环境的改善、减少医学生虐待以及随后对 AAMC GQ 数据的改善进行正式评估。