University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA.
Centro Oncológico Integral with DEMEDICA, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 1;41(1):65-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02953. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
Intravenous paclitaxel (IVpac) is complicated by neuropathy and requires premedication to prevent hypersensitivity-type reactions. Paclitaxel is poorly absorbed orally; encequidar (E), a novel P-glycoprotein pump inhibitor, allows oral absorption.
A phase III open-label study comparing oral paclitaxel plus E (oPac + E) 205 mg/m paclitaxel plus 15 mg E methanesulfonate monohydrate 3 consecutive days per week versus IVpac 175 mg/m once every 3 weeks was performed. Women with metastatic breast cancer and adequate organ function, at least 1 year from last taxane, were randomly assigned 2:1 to oPac + E versus IVpac. The primary end point was confirmed radiographic response using RECIST 1.1, assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Four hundred two patients from Latin America were enrolled (265 oPac + E, 137 IVpac); demographics and prior therapies were balanced. The confirmed response (intent-to-treat) was 36% for oPac + E versus 23% for IVpac ( = .01). The PFS was 8.4 versus 7.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.768; 95.5% CI, 0.584 to 1.01; = .046), and the OS was 22.7 versus 16.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.794; 95.5% CI, 0.607 to 1.037; = .08). Grade 3-4 adverse reactions were 55% with oPac + E and 53% with IVpac. oPac + E had lower incidence and severity of neuropathy (2% 15% > grade 2) and alopecia (49% 62% all grades) than IVpac but more nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and neutropenic complications, particularly in patients with elevated liver enzymes. On-study deaths (8% oPac + E 9% IVpac) were treatment-related in 3% and 0%, respectively.
oPac + E increased the confirmed tumor response versus IVpac, with trends in PFS and OS. Neuropathy was less frequent and severe with oPac + E; neutropenic serious infections were increased. Elevated liver enzymes at baseline predispose oPac + E patients to early neutropenia and serious infections (funded by Athenex, Inc; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02594371).
静脉注射紫杉醇(IVpac)会引起神经病变,需要进行预处理以预防过敏反应。紫杉醇口服吸收较差;恩奎达(E),一种新型的 P-糖蛋白泵抑制剂,可促进口服吸收。
进行了一项 III 期开放性标签研究,比较每周连续 3 天口服紫杉醇加 E(oPac + E)205mg/m 紫杉醇加 15mg E 甲磺酸盐一水合物与 IVpac 175mg/m 每 3 周 1 次的疗效。患有转移性乳腺癌且器官功能充足、末次紫杉烷治疗至少 1 年的患者按 2:1 随机分配至 oPac + E 与 IVpac 组。主要终点是使用 RECIST 1.1 通过盲法独立中心评估确认的放射学应答。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
共纳入来自拉丁美洲的 402 例患者(oPac + E 组 265 例,IVpac 组 137 例);两组的人口统计学和既往治疗情况均平衡。oPac + E 组的确认应答(意向治疗)为 36%,IVpac 组为 23%( =.01)。PFS 分别为 8.4 个月和 7.4 个月(风险比,0.768;95.5%CI,0.584 至 1.01; =.046),OS 分别为 22.7 个月和 16.5 个月(风险比,0.794;95.5%CI,0.607 至 1.037; =.08)。oPac + E 组和 IVpac 组分别有 55%和 53%的患者发生 3-4 级不良反应。oPac + E 组的神经病变(2% 15% > 2 级)和脱发(49% 62% 所有等级)发生率和严重程度均低于 IVpac 组,但恶心、呕吐、腹泻和中性粒细胞减少性并发症更多,尤其是在肝酶升高的患者中。研究期间死亡(oPac + E 组 8%,IVpac 组 9%)分别有 3%和 0%与治疗相关。
oPac + E 增加了确认的肿瘤反应,与 PFS 和 OS 趋势一致。oPac + E 组的神经病变发生率和严重程度较低;中性粒细胞减少性严重感染增加。基线时肝酶升高使 oPac + E 患者易发生中性粒细胞减少和严重感染(由 Athenex,Inc 资助;临床试验标识符:NCT02594371)。