Suppr超能文献

开放性、随机、多中心、III 期研究比较口服紫杉醇联合恩西奎达与静脉紫杉醇治疗转移性乳腺癌患者。

Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Study Comparing Oral Paclitaxel Plus Encequidar Versus Intravenous Paclitaxel in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

机构信息

University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA.

Centro Oncológico Integral with DEMEDICA, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 1;41(1):65-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02953. Epub 2022 Jul 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Intravenous paclitaxel (IVpac) is complicated by neuropathy and requires premedication to prevent hypersensitivity-type reactions. Paclitaxel is poorly absorbed orally; encequidar (E), a novel P-glycoprotein pump inhibitor, allows oral absorption.

METHODS

A phase III open-label study comparing oral paclitaxel plus E (oPac + E) 205 mg/m paclitaxel plus 15 mg E methanesulfonate monohydrate 3 consecutive days per week versus IVpac 175 mg/m once every 3 weeks was performed. Women with metastatic breast cancer and adequate organ function, at least 1 year from last taxane, were randomly assigned 2:1 to oPac + E versus IVpac. The primary end point was confirmed radiographic response using RECIST 1.1, assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Four hundred two patients from Latin America were enrolled (265 oPac + E, 137 IVpac); demographics and prior therapies were balanced. The confirmed response (intent-to-treat) was 36% for oPac + E versus 23% for IVpac ( = .01). The PFS was 8.4 versus 7.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.768; 95.5% CI, 0.584 to 1.01; = .046), and the OS was 22.7 versus 16.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.794; 95.5% CI, 0.607 to 1.037; = .08). Grade 3-4 adverse reactions were 55% with oPac + E and 53% with IVpac. oPac + E had lower incidence and severity of neuropathy (2% 15% > grade 2) and alopecia (49% 62% all grades) than IVpac but more nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and neutropenic complications, particularly in patients with elevated liver enzymes. On-study deaths (8% oPac + E 9% IVpac) were treatment-related in 3% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

oPac + E increased the confirmed tumor response versus IVpac, with trends in PFS and OS. Neuropathy was less frequent and severe with oPac + E; neutropenic serious infections were increased. Elevated liver enzymes at baseline predispose oPac + E patients to early neutropenia and serious infections (funded by Athenex, Inc; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02594371).

摘要

目的

静脉注射紫杉醇(IVpac)会引起神经病变,需要进行预处理以预防过敏反应。紫杉醇口服吸收较差;恩奎达(E),一种新型的 P-糖蛋白泵抑制剂,可促进口服吸收。

方法

进行了一项 III 期开放性标签研究,比较每周连续 3 天口服紫杉醇加 E(oPac + E)205mg/m 紫杉醇加 15mg E 甲磺酸盐一水合物与 IVpac 175mg/m 每 3 周 1 次的疗效。患有转移性乳腺癌且器官功能充足、末次紫杉烷治疗至少 1 年的患者按 2:1 随机分配至 oPac + E 与 IVpac 组。主要终点是使用 RECIST 1.1 通过盲法独立中心评估确认的放射学应答。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。

结果

共纳入来自拉丁美洲的 402 例患者(oPac + E 组 265 例,IVpac 组 137 例);两组的人口统计学和既往治疗情况均平衡。oPac + E 组的确认应答(意向治疗)为 36%,IVpac 组为 23%( =.01)。PFS 分别为 8.4 个月和 7.4 个月(风险比,0.768;95.5%CI,0.584 至 1.01; =.046),OS 分别为 22.7 个月和 16.5 个月(风险比,0.794;95.5%CI,0.607 至 1.037; =.08)。oPac + E 组和 IVpac 组分别有 55%和 53%的患者发生 3-4 级不良反应。oPac + E 组的神经病变(2% 15% > 2 级)和脱发(49% 62% 所有等级)发生率和严重程度均低于 IVpac 组,但恶心、呕吐、腹泻和中性粒细胞减少性并发症更多,尤其是在肝酶升高的患者中。研究期间死亡(oPac + E 组 8%,IVpac 组 9%)分别有 3%和 0%与治疗相关。

结论

oPac + E 增加了确认的肿瘤反应,与 PFS 和 OS 趋势一致。oPac + E 组的神经病变发生率和严重程度较低;中性粒细胞减少性严重感染增加。基线时肝酶升高使 oPac + E 患者易发生中性粒细胞减少和严重感染(由 Athenex,Inc 资助;临床试验标识符:NCT02594371)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d17e/9788977/84b8083cb6b1/jco-41-065-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验