Suppr超能文献

三种不同镍钛旋转锉系统在前牙牙本质裂形成中的比较评价。

An comparative evaluation of dentinal crack formation caused by three different nickel-titanium rotary file systems in primary anterior teeth.

机构信息

Department Paediatric Dentistry, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022 Apr-Jun;40(2):188-194. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_100_22.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Cleaning and shaping of the canals damages the root dentin which becomes a gateway to dentinal cracks and thereby causes failure of the treatment.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess and compare dentinal crack formation caused by three different nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary file systems in primary anterior teeth.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

The present in vitro study is an experimental, comparative study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty extracted primary anterior teeth were included in this study. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups. Group 1: Pedoflex rotary file system, Group 2: Prime Pedo rotary file system, Group 3: Kedo-S rotary file system, Group 4: K-files, and Group 5: no instrumentation. Roots were sectioned and viewed under a stereomicroscope for the presence of any cracks.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

The data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

In the coronal, middle, and apical thirds, Group 2 showed a maximum number of crack formations in the middle third (57%), followed by Group 3 (43.3%) and Group 1 (36.7%). Groups 4 and 5 showed no crack formation in all the root sections. The middle third showed a maximum number of crack formations compared to the coronal and apical thirds.

CONCLUSIONS

Rotary systems render various benefits with an acceptable success in comparison to conventional hand instrumentation. Within the limitation of this study, it was found that Pedoflex rotary file system was the best with the least number of crack formations.

摘要

背景

根管的清洁和成形会损伤牙本质,导致牙本质微裂,并最终导致治疗失败。

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较三种不同镍钛(NiTi)旋转锉系统在前牙牙髓治疗中引起牙本质微裂的情况。

设置和设计

本研究为体外实验,对照研究。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 150 颗因正畸需要而拔除的前磨牙。这些牙齿被随机分为五组。第 1 组:Pedoflex 旋转锉系统;第 2 组:Prime Pedo 旋转锉系统;第 3 组:Kedo-S 旋转锉系统;第 4 组:K 锉;第 5 组:不进行器械预备。将根部分段,在立体显微镜下观察有无裂纹。

统计学分析

采用卡方检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验对数据进行分析。

结果

在根管中上 1/3 段,第 2 组(57%)的牙本质微裂发生率最高,其次是第 3 组(43.3%)和第 1 组(36.7%)。第 4 组和第 5 组在所有根段均未发现牙本质微裂。与根管和根尖 1/3 段相比,中段牙本质微裂发生率最高。

结论

与传统手用器械相比,旋转器械具有多种优势,成功率可接受。在本研究的限制范围内,发现 Pedoflex 旋转锉系统引起的牙本质微裂最少,是最好的系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验