Tsuda Toyonobu, Hayashi Kenshi, Kato Takeshi, Usuda Keisuke, Kusayama Takashi, Nomura Akihiro, Tada Hayato, Usui Soichiro, Sakata Kenji, Kawashiri Masa-Aki, Fujino Noboru, Yamagishi Masakazu, Takamura Masayuki
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kanazawa Japan.
Osaka University of Human Sciences Settsu Japan.
Circ Rep. 2022 Jun 15;4(7):298-307. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0012. eCollection 2022 Jul 8.
Few studies in Japan have reported on follow-up data regarding the clinical course and risk factors for adverse outcomes in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), vs. younger patients, when considering the competing risk of death. We prospectively studied 1,328 patients with NVAF (965 men; mean [±SD] age 72.4±9.7 years) from the Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry with a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range 3.5-5.3 years) and evaluated the incidence of thromboembolism or major bleeding in elderly (age ≥75 years; n=595) and non-elderly (age <75 years; n=733) patients. Analysis using the Gray method showed no significant difference in the incidence of thromboembolism; however, the incidence of major bleeding was significantly higher in the elderly than non-elderly group. The Fine-Gray model, after adjustment for age and sex in the elderly group, showed that age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.13; P=0.004) and warfarin use (HR 1.87; 95% CI 1.12-3.14; P=0.02) were significantly associated with major bleeding. In the elderly group, those using warfarin had a higher incidence of thromboembolism and major bleeding than those using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The efficacy and safety of DOACs were remarkable in elderly compared with non-elderly patients with NVAF considering the competing risk of death. DOACs may be a favorable choice in elderly patients with NVAF.
在日本,很少有研究报告非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)老年患者与年轻患者相比,在考虑死亡这一竞争风险时的临床病程及不良结局风险因素的随访数据。我们对来自北陆加房颤注册研究的1328例NVAF患者(965例男性;平均[±标准差]年龄72.4±9.7岁)进行了前瞻性研究,中位随访时间为5.0年(四分位间距3.5 - 5.3年),并评估了老年(年龄≥75岁;n = 595)和非老年(年龄<75岁;n = 733)患者血栓栓塞或大出血的发生率。使用Gray方法分析显示,血栓栓塞发生率无显著差异;然而,老年组大出血发生率显著高于非老年组。在老年组中对年龄和性别进行调整后,Fine - Gray模型显示年龄(风险比[HR] 1.08;95%置信区间[CI] 1.02 - 1.13;P = 0.004)和使用华法林(HR 1.87;95% CI 1.12 - 3.14;P = 0.02)与大出血显著相关。在老年组中,使用华法林的患者血栓栓塞和大出血发生率高于使用直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的患者。考虑到死亡这一竞争风险,与非老年NVAF患者相比,DOACs在老年患者中的有效性和安全性显著。DOACs可能是老年NVAF患者的一个有利选择。