Department of Pediatrics and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Emory Global Health Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271662. eCollection 2022.
The high burden of stillbirths and neonatal deaths is driving global initiatives to improve birth outcomes. Discerning stillbirths from neonatal deaths can be difficult in some settings, yet this distinction is critical for understanding causes of perinatal deaths and improving resuscitation practices for live born babies.
We evaluated data from the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network to compare the accuracy of determining stillbirths versus neonatal deaths from different data sources and to evaluate evidence of resuscitation at delivery in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. CHAMPS works to identify causes of stillbirth and death in children <5 years of age in Bangladesh and 6 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Using CHAMPS data, we compared the final classification of a case as a stillbirth or neonatal death as certified by the CHAMPS Determining Cause of Death (DeCoDe) panel to both the initial report of the case by the family member or healthcare worker at CHAMPS enrollment and the birth outcome as stillbirth or livebirth documented in the maternal health record.
Of 1967 deaths ultimately classified as stillbirth, only 28 (1.4%) were initially reported as livebirths. Of 845 cases classified as very early neonatal death, 33 (4%) were initially reported as stillbirth. Of 367 cases with post-mortem examination showing delivery weight >1000g and no maceration, the maternal clinical record documented that resuscitation was not performed in 161 cases (44%), performed in 14 (3%), and unknown or data missing for 192 (52%).
This analysis found that CHAMPS cases assigned as stillbirth or neonatal death after DeCoDe expert panel review were generally consistent with the initial report of the case as a stillbirth or neonatal death. Our findings suggest that more frequent use of resuscitation at delivery and improvements in documentation around events at birth could help improve perinatal outcomes.
高比例的死产和新生儿死亡正在推动全球改善生育结果的举措。在某些情况下,区分死产和新生儿死亡可能具有挑战性,但这种区分对于了解围产期死亡的原因和改进活产婴儿的复苏实践至关重要。
我们评估了儿童健康和死亡率监测(CHAMPS)网络的数据,以比较不同数据源确定死产和新生儿死亡的准确性,并评估按照世界卫生组织(WHO)指南在分娩时进行复苏的证据。CHAMPS 致力于在孟加拉国和撒哈拉以南非洲的 6 个国家确定 5 岁以下儿童的死产和死亡原因。我们使用 CHAMPS 数据,将案例最终被 CHAMPS 确定死因(DeCoDe)小组分类为死产或新生儿死亡的情况与案例的初始报告进行了比较,案例的初始报告是由 CHAMPS 入组时的家庭成员或医疗保健工作者提供的,以及在产妇健康记录中记录的出生结果为死产或活产。
在最终被分类为死产的 1967 例死亡中,只有 28 例(1.4%)最初报告为活产。在被分类为极早期新生儿死亡的 845 例病例中,有 33 例(4%)最初报告为死产。在 367 例死后检查显示出生体重>1000g 且无尸斑的病例中,产妇临床记录记录了在 161 例(44%)病例中未进行复苏,在 14 例(3%)病例中进行了复苏,在 192 例(52%)病例中未记录或数据缺失。
本分析发现,在 DeCoDe 专家小组审查后被归类为死产或新生儿死亡的 CHAMPS 病例通常与作为死产或新生儿死亡的初始报告一致。我们的研究结果表明,更频繁地在分娩时进行复苏,并改进与出生时事件相关的记录,可能有助于改善围产期结局。