Heinsimer J A, Collins G J, Burkman M H, Roberts L, Chen J T
JAMA. 1987 Jun 19;257(23):3266-8.
We performed a prospective, blinded, controlled study to test the hypothesis that supine cross-table lateral chest roentgenograms might have an advantage over conventional lateral chest roentgenograms for the detection of pericardial effusion using the epicardial fat stripe sign. In comparison with echocardiography as the gold standard, we found that supine cross-table lateral chest roentgenograms had greater sensitivity (51%) for pericardial effusions than conventional lateral chest roentgenograms (sensitivity, 31%). Specificity was essentially the same for both techniques. A large pericardial effusion was more readily detected by supine cross-table lateral chest roentgenograms (86%) than by the conventional lateral chest roentgenograms (36%). We conclude that a supine cross-table lateral chest roentgenogram should be included in the evaluation of patients with suspected pericardial effusion or in patients in whom a large cardiac silhouette is detected on a standard chest roentgenogram.
我们进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、对照研究,以检验以下假设:对于使用心外膜脂肪带征检测心包积液,仰卧位十字交叉侧位胸部X线片可能优于传统侧位胸部X线片。与作为金标准的超声心动图相比,我们发现仰卧位十字交叉侧位胸部X线片检测心包积液的敏感性(51%)高于传统侧位胸部X线片(敏感性为31%)。两种技术的特异性基本相同。仰卧位十字交叉侧位胸部X线片(86%)比传统侧位胸部X线片(36%)更容易检测到大量心包积液。我们得出结论,对于疑似心包积液的患者或在标准胸部X线片上检测到心脏轮廓增大的患者,仰卧位十字交叉侧位胸部X线片应纳入评估。