University of Helsinki, Faculty of Medicine, Medicum, Department of Virology, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Zürich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Zürich, Switzerland.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0158522. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01585-22. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
Mammarenaviruses establish a persistent infection in their rodent and bat hosts, and the evidence suggests that reptarenaviruses and hartmaniviruses found in captive snakes act similarly. In snakes, reptarenaviruses cause boid inclusion body disease (BIBD), which is often associated with secondary infections. Snakes with BIBD usually carry more than a single pair of reptarenavirus S and L segments and occasionally demonstrate hartmanivirus coinfection. Here, we reported the generation of cell lines persistently infected with a single or two reptarenavirus(es) and a cell line with persistent reptarenavirus-hartmanivirus coinfection. By RT-PCR we demonstrated that the amount of viral RNA within the persistently infected cells remains at levels similar to those observed following initial infection. Using antibodies against the glycoproteins (GPs) and nucleoprotein (NP) of reptarenaviruses, we studied the levels of viral protein in cells passaged 10 times after the original inoculation and observed that the expression of GPs declines dramatically during persistent infection, unlike the expression of NP. Immunofluorescence (IF) staining served to demonstrate differences in the distribution of NP within the persistently infected compared to freshly infected cells. IF staining of cells inoculated with the viruses secreted from the persistently infected cell lines produced similar NP staining compared to cells infected with a traditionally passaged virus, suggesting that the altered NP expression pattern of persistently infected cells does not relate to changes in the virus. The cell cultures described herein can serve as tools for studying the coinfection and superinfection interplay between reptarenaviruses and studying the BIBD pathogenesis mechanisms. Mammarenaviruses cause a persistent infection in their natural rodent and bat hosts. Reptarenaviruses cause boid inclusion body disease (BIBD) in constrictor snakes, but it is unclear whether snakes are the natural host of these viruses. In this study, we showed that reptarenaviruses established a persistent infection in cultured Boa constrictor cells and that the persistently infected cells continued to produce infectious virus. Our results showed that persistent infection results from subsequent passaging of cells inoculated with a single reptarenavirus, two reptarenaviruses, or even when inoculating the cells with reptarenavirus and hartmanivirus (another arenavirus genus). The results further suggested that coinfection would not result in overt competition between the different reptarenaviruses, thus helping to explain the frequent reptarenavirus coinfections in snakes with BIBD. The established cell culture models of persistent infection could help to elucidate the role of coinfection and superinfection and potential immunosuppression as the pathogenic mechanisms behind BIBD.
哺乳动物沙粒病毒在其自然宿主啮齿类动物和蝙蝠中建立持续性感染,而有证据表明,在圈养蛇中发现的爬行类沙粒病毒和哈特曼病毒的行为类似。在蛇中,爬行类沙粒病毒引起蟒蚺包涵体病(BIBD),通常与继发感染有关。患有 BIBD 的蛇通常携带不止一对爬行类沙粒病毒的 S 和 L 片段,偶尔还表现出哈特曼病毒的合并感染。在这里,我们报告了用单一或两种爬行类沙粒病毒(s)持续感染细胞系和一种持续爬行类沙粒病毒-哈特曼病毒合并感染细胞系的生成。通过 RT-PCR,我们证明了持续感染细胞内的病毒 RNA 量保持在与初始感染后观察到的相似水平。我们使用针对爬行类沙粒病毒糖蛋白(GPs)和核蛋白(NP)的抗体,研究了在最初接种后传代 10 次的细胞中的病毒蛋白水平,并观察到 NP 的表达在持续性感染过程中显著下降,而 GP 的表达则不同。免疫荧光(IF)染色用于证明与新感染细胞相比,NP 在持续感染细胞中的分布存在差异。用来自持续感染细胞系分泌的病毒接种的细胞的 IF 染色与用传统传代病毒感染的细胞产生的 NP 染色相似,这表明持续感染细胞中 NP 表达模式的改变与病毒无关。本文描述的细胞培养物可作为研究爬行类沙粒病毒合并感染和超感染相互作用以及研究 BIBD 发病机制的工具。 哺乳动物沙粒病毒在其自然宿主啮齿类动物和蝙蝠中引起持续性感染。爬行类沙粒病毒在蟒蚺中引起蟒蚺包涵体病(BIBD),但尚不清楚蛇是否是这些病毒的天然宿主。在这项研究中,我们表明爬行类沙粒病毒在培养的波氏蟒细胞中建立了持续性感染,并且持续感染的细胞继续产生感染性病毒。我们的结果表明,持续性感染是由随后接种单一爬行类沙粒病毒、两种爬行类沙粒病毒,甚至是接种爬行类沙粒病毒和哈特曼病毒(另一种沙粒病毒属)的细胞引起的。结果进一步表明,合并感染不会导致不同爬行类沙粒病毒之间的明显竞争,从而有助于解释在患有 BIBD 的蛇中频繁出现的爬行类沙粒病毒合并感染。建立的持续性感染细胞培养模型可以帮助阐明合并感染和超感染以及潜在免疫抑制在 BIBD 发病机制中的作用。