Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 9501 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Hum Pathol. 2022 Oct;128:90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.07.012. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
Surgical excision of breast intraductal papilloma (IDP) without atypia diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB) is controversial as the risk of upgrade to malignant lesions is not well established. This study investigates upgrade rates of benign and atypical IDP to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive carcinoma (IC) and clinicopathologic predictors. We identified 556 cases of IDP diagnosed on CNB at a single institution from 2010 to 2020 after excluding patients with a history of breast carcinoma, ipsilateral high-risk lesion, radiologic/pathologic discordance, or less than 2 years of follow-up if no excision within 1 year. Of these, 97 biopsies were consistent with atypical IDP and 459 were benign IDP. Surgical excision was performed for 318 (57.2%), and the remaining 238 (42.8%) underwent active monitoring. The upgrade rate for IDP without atypia was 2/225 (0.9%; 1 DCIS and 1 IC). Of 93 surgically excised atypical IDPs, 19 (20.4%) upgraded (14 DCIS and 5 IC). Of 238 nonexcised IDPs followed clinically (range, 24-140 months, mean 60 months), there was no subsequent breast cancer diagnosed at the IDP site on follow-up. Mean age of patients was 56 yr ± 12.6 SD without upgrade, 63 yr ± 10.6 SD (P = .027) with DCIS, and 61 yr ± 10.8 SD (P = .35) with IC. Atypical IDP was more likely to upgrade if biopsied by stereotactic guidance (8/19, 42.1% P = .035). At our institution, we had an exceedingly low upgrade rate for benign IDP. Overall, patients with upgrade to DCIS were older. For atypical IDP, upgrade was seen in higher proportions of stereotactic biopsies.
在核心针活检 (CNB) 诊断为非典型性乳腺导管内乳头状瘤 (IDP) 时,是否进行外科切除存在争议,因为恶性病变升级的风险尚未得到充分证实。本研究旨在调查良性和非典型 IDP 升级为导管原位癌 (DCIS) 和浸润性癌 (IC) 的发生率,以及临床病理预测因素。我们在一家机构中从 2010 年至 2020 年期间确定了 556 例 CNB 诊断为 IDP 的病例,排除了有乳腺癌病史、同侧高危病变、影像学/病理学不一致或如果在 1 年内未行切除而在 1 年内无随访的患者。其中,97 例活检符合非典型 IDP,459 例为良性 IDP。318 例(57.2%)进行了外科切除,其余 238 例(42.8%)进行了主动监测。非典型 IDP 的升级率为 2/225(0.9%;1 例 DCIS 和 1 例 IC)。93 例手术切除的非典型 IDP 中,19 例(20.4%)升级(14 例 DCIS 和 5 例 IC)。238 例未切除的 IDP 进行了临床随访(范围 24-140 个月,平均 60 个月),在随访期间,在 IDP 部位未诊断出后续乳腺癌。无升级患者的平均年龄为 56 岁 ± 12.6 岁(SD),DCIS 患者为 63 岁 ± 10.6 岁(P=.027),IC 患者为 61 岁 ± 10.8 岁(P=.35)。如果采用立体定向引导进行活检,非典型 IDP 更有可能升级(8/19,42.1%,P=.035)。在我们的机构中,良性 IDP 的升级率极低。总体而言,升级为 DCIS 的患者年龄较大。对于非典型 IDP,立体定向活检的升级比例更高。