Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Viral Hepatitis Care Network, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jun;21(6):1513-1522.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
Whether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) differentially affect relapse and outcomes following treatment discontinuation across different patient subpopulations remains unclear. We aimed to compare rates of off-therapy hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, virological and clinical relapse, and retreatment between chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who discontinued TDF or ETV therapy.
This study included 1402 virally suppressed CHB patients who stopped either ETV (n = 981) or TDF (n = 421) therapy between 2001 and 2020 from 13 participating centers across North America, Europe, and Asia. All patients were hepatitis B e antigen-negative at treatment discontinuation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the treatment groups. Outcomes were analyzed using survival methods.
During a median off-treatment follow-up of 18 months, HBsAg loss occurred in 96 (6.8%) patients overall. Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a higher rate of HBsAg loss (P = .03); however, the association was no longer significant after statistical adjustment (P = .61). Virological relapse occurred earlier among TDF-treated patients (P < .01); nonetheless, rates became comparable after the first year off therapy (P = .49). TDF was significantly associated with a higher clinical relapse rate than ETV throughout follow-up (P < .01). The development of a virological or clinical relapse did not affect the rate of HBsAg loss. Retreatment rates were not significantly different between the treatment groups.
TDF and ETV have differential relapse patterns but are associated with similar rates of HBsAg loss and retreatment following discontinuation. Finite therapy can be considered for CHB patients on either TDF or ETV therapy.
恩替卡韦(ETV)和替诺福韦酯富马酸(TDF)在不同患者亚群中停药后复发和结局的影响是否不同仍不清楚。我们旨在比较慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者停止 TDF 或 ETV 治疗后停药后乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)丢失、病毒学和临床复发以及再治疗的比率。
本研究纳入了 2001 年至 2020 年期间来自北美、欧洲和亚洲 13 个参与中心的 1402 名病毒抑制的 CHB 患者,他们停止了 ETV(n=981)或 TDF(n=421)治疗。所有患者在停药时均为乙型肝炎 e 抗原阴性。采用逆概率治疗加权法平衡治疗组。采用生存方法分析结局。
在中位 18 个月的停药随访期间,总体有 96(6.8%)例患者发生 HBsAg 丢失。与 ETV 相比,TDF 与较高的 HBsAg 丢失率相关(P=0.03);然而,在统计学调整后,这种关联不再显著(P=0.61)。TDF 治疗的患者更早出现病毒学复发(P<0.01);尽管如此,在停药后的第一年,两者的复发率变得相当(P=0.49)。在整个随访期间,TDF 与 ETV 相比,临床复发率显著较高(P<0.01)。病毒学或临床复发的发生并不影响 HBsAg 丢失率。两组之间的再治疗率无显著差异。
TDF 和 ETV 的复发模式不同,但停药后 HBsAg 丢失和再治疗的比率相似。对于接受 TDF 或 ETV 治疗的 CHB 患者,可以考虑有限疗程的治疗。