School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pennsylvania State University College of Nursing, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Apr;79(4):1575-1588. doi: 10.1111/jan.15380. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
The aim was to examine and describe women's emergency department visits and care-seeking experiences, including recognition, evaluation and communication of symptoms, injuries and health risks after non-fatal intimate partner strangulation.
Using a diagnostic process framework, this mixed-methods study explores concordance and discordance of interview and medical records data to highlight opportunities for clinical diagnostic improvement.
In-depth, semi-structured interviews with women after an emergency department visit for non-fatal intimate partner strangulation, concurrent with medical records reviews, were conducted between March 2018 and January 2019. A constant comparative approach was used to analyse interview and medical record data using an a priori codebook designed based on the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine's conceptual model of the diagnostic process and prior intimate partner violence research.
Interviews reflected participants did not have a sense of long-term health risks from their strangulation beyond addressing emotional trauma. Women noted that forensic and emergency nursing support was treatment in and of itself that allowed them to be heard and validated. Medical record clinical impressions and final diagnoses included domestic violence, domestic abuse or sexual assault, but not specifically strangulation.
This study contributes to the growing literature regarding strangulation diagnosis and care. Our findings provide new details of women's emergency department care-seeking experiences which, whilst overall aligned with medical records documentation, were not reflected in final diagnostic impressions nor in patient recollection of long-term health risks.
Nurses are strongly positioned as clinical practice leaders and policy advocates to improve collective responses to this dangerous violence mechanism. Actions such as improving patient education, referral and follow-up options to better communication and address long-term strangulation risk are one example. Further research on non-fatal intimate partner strangulation and care-seeking is warranted to expand this knowledge, particularly in longitudinal cohorts and varied geographical areas.
本研究旨在调查和描述女性在遭受非致命性亲密伴侣勒颈后的就诊经历和寻求医疗服务的经历,包括对症状、伤害和健康风险的识别、评估和沟通。
本混合方法研究使用诊断过程框架,通过比较访谈和病历数据,探索两者的一致性和差异性,以突出临床诊断改进的机会。
2018 年 3 月至 2019 年 1 月,对在急诊科就诊的非致命性亲密伴侣勒颈女性进行深入的半结构式访谈,同时对病历进行回顾。采用基于国家科学院、工程和医学的诊断过程概念模型以及先前亲密伴侣暴力研究的预先设计的编码手册的恒定比较方法,对访谈和病历数据进行分析。
访谈反映出,除了解决情感创伤外,参与者没有意识到勒颈对长期健康的风险。女性指出,法医和急诊护理支持本身就是一种治疗方式,可以让她们被倾听和认可。病历的临床印象和最终诊断包括家庭暴力、虐待或性侵犯,但没有专门针对勒颈。
本研究为不断增加的有关勒颈诊断和护理的文献做出了贡献。我们的研究结果提供了女性在急诊科就诊经历的新细节,这些细节总体上与病历记录一致,但并未反映在最终的诊断印象中,也未反映在患者对长期健康风险的回忆中。
护士作为临床实践的领导者和政策倡导者,在改善对这种危险暴力行为的集体反应方面具有重要地位。例如,改善患者教育、转诊和随访选择,以更好地沟通和处理长期的勒颈风险,就是一个例子。需要进一步研究非致命性亲密伴侣勒颈和就诊行为,以扩大这方面的知识,特别是在纵向队列和不同地理区域。