Suppr超能文献

[对心肌梗死患者进行冠状动脉内和静脉内注射链激酶后的冠状动脉溶栓治疗]

[Coronary thrombolysis after intracoronary and intravenous administration of streptokinase to myocardial infarct patients].

作者信息

Dorogun B N, Smirnov A A, Dobrovol'skiĭ A B, Pomerantsev E V, Staroverov I I

出版信息

Kardiologiia. 1987 Mar;27(3):9-14.

PMID:3586489
Abstract

Coronary thrombolysis by intracoronary and intravenous streptokinase (SK) is reported in myocardial infarction patients. Forty-two patients were examined within the first 6 hours of infarction: they were subjected to coronary-angiography on admission and 24 hours later, and their plasma fibrinogen levels were measured repeatedly for 2 days. SK administration was intracoronary in 24 patients and intravenous in 18. Rapid intravenous SK injection was not inferior to intracoronary administration in terms of efficiency. Although coronary reperfusion takes a somewhat longer time in cases of intravenous SK treatment, its technical simplicity and relative safety, as well as the fact that it can be started early suggest that it is a promising method of treatment for myocardial infarction.

摘要

据报道,在心肌梗死患者中采用冠状动脉内和静脉内注射链激酶(SK)进行冠状动脉溶栓治疗。42例患者在梗死的最初6小时内接受了检查:入院时和24小时后进行冠状动脉造影,并连续2天反复测量其血浆纤维蛋白原水平。24例患者采用冠状动脉内注射SK,18例采用静脉内注射。就疗效而言,快速静脉内注射SK并不逊色于冠状动脉内给药。尽管静脉内SK治疗时冠状动脉再灌注所需时间稍长,但其技术简单、相对安全,且可早期开始治疗,这表明它是一种有前景的心肌梗死治疗方法。

相似文献

4
Intracoronary versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction.
Int J Cardiol. 1988 May;19(2):181-9. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(88)90078-2.
5
Intravenous versus intracoronary streptokinase for acute transmural myocardial infarction.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1984;10(4):319-27. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810100403.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验