Department of Orthopedics, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Clin J Pain. 2022 Sep 1;38(9):582-592. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001059.
No review or meta-analysis exists to elucidate the efficacy and safety of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) on the pain intensity, opioid requirement, and mobilization in patients undergoing hip surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials were designed to compare QLB with no block or placebo (without other nerve/plexus blocks) for patients undergoing hip surgery.
Two individual researchers conducted the platform searches on the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception to June 12, 2021. Only English publications were included. The pain at rest score at 12 postoperative hours was designated as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included rest pain at rest scores at 6 and 24 postoperative hours, dynamic pain score at 6, 12, and 24 postoperative hours, total opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction.
Seven trials including 514 patients were included. When compared with controls, the QLB technique significantly reduced pain at rest scores at 12 hours after surgery (mean difference -1.15, -1.52 to -0.77, P <0.0001). The secondary outcomes were limited by heterogeneity: secondary pain outcomes and opioid consumption were consistently improved with QLB ( P <0.05); patient satisfaction and postoperative nausea and vomiting were similar between the groups based on the Inverse Variance Heterogeneity model ( P >0.05). The overall quality of evidence was moderate.
There is moderate evidence that QLB employment in hip surgery produces significant reduction in pain scores and opioid consumption within 24 hours. QLB appears to be an appropriate option for postoperative analgesia after hip surgery.
目前尚无综述或荟萃分析阐明竖脊肌阻滞(QLB)在髋部手术患者的疼痛强度、阿片类药物需求和活动能力方面的疗效和安全性。本系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析旨在比较 QLB 与无阻滞或安慰剂(无其他神经/丛阻滞)在髋部手术患者中的效果。
两名独立研究人员于 2021 年 6 月 12 日在 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 数据库上进行了平台搜索。仅纳入英文出版物。将术后 12 小时静息疼痛评分作为主要结局。次要结局包括术后 6 小时和 24 小时静息疼痛评分、术后 6 小时、12 小时和 24 小时动态疼痛评分、总阿片类药物消耗量、术后恶心和呕吐以及患者满意度。
纳入 7 项试验共 514 例患者。与对照组相比,QLB 技术显著降低术后 12 小时静息疼痛评分(平均差值-1.15,-1.52 至-0.77,P<0.0001)。次要结局因异质性受限:QLB 始终改善次要疼痛结局和阿片类药物消耗(P<0.05);根据Inverse Variance Heterogeneity 模型,两组患者的满意度和术后恶心呕吐无差异(P>0.05)。总体证据质量为中等。
有中等质量证据表明,髋部手术中使用 QLB 可在 24 小时内显著降低疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗。QLB 似乎是髋部手术后术后镇痛的合适选择。