• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挥发性麻醉与依托咪酯为基础的全静脉麻醉:回顾性分析接受择期消化道癌症根治性手术患者的图表。

Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 22;101(29):e29169. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029169.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000029169
PMID:35866788
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9302329/
Abstract

The surgical stress responses, surgeries, and anesthetics used during surgeries have effects on post-surgery complications and metastasis. Volatile and/or intravenous anesthetics are generally used for cancer curative surgeries. Therefore, appropriate selection of anesthetics should be considered for better clinical outcomes. The objectives of the study were to compare postoperative complications, the overall survival, and recurrence-free survival of patients who had received volatile anesthesia against those of patients who had received propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for digestive tract cancer curative surgeries. Patients had received propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (PA cohort, n = 120) or volatile anesthesia (VA cohort, n = 185) for elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries. Patients with age > 50 years (P = .0399), body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 (P = .0423), cancer stage III (P = .0041), and cancer stage IV (P = .0189) were operated through volatile anesthesia. Females (P = .0346), disable patients (P = .0479), patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index 2 (P = .0449), patients with cancer stage 0 or I (P = .0141), and patients with cancer stage II (P = .0289) were operated through propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia. Postoperative complication(s) between patients of both cohorts were statistically same (P = .9217). After 3-years of the follow-up period, a total of 81 (44%) patients from the VA cohort and 63 (52%) patients from the PA cohort survived irrespective of any kind of disease(s) (P = .9918). Also, a total of 53 (29%) patients from the VA cohort and 42 (35%) patients from the PA cohort survived without progression of cancer (P = .9981) after 3-years. Age > 50 years (P = 0.0491), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3 (P = 0.0481), and cancer stage > II (P = .0412) were independent parameters for death of patients suffering from digestive tract cancer due to any reason(s) during 3-years of the follow-up period after surgeries. The selection of anesthetic agents for cancer curative surgeries does not affect survival during 3-years of follow-up and postoperative complication(s) of patients suffering from digestive tract cancer (Level of Evidence: III; Technical Efficacy Stage: 4).

摘要

手术应激反应、手术本身以及术中使用的麻醉剂会影响术后并发症和转移。挥发性和/或静脉麻醉剂通常用于癌症根治性手术。因此,为了获得更好的临床结果,应考虑选择合适的麻醉剂。本研究的目的是比较接受挥发性麻醉的患者与接受依托咪酯全凭静脉麻醉的患者在消化道癌症根治性手术后的术后并发症、总生存率和无复发生存率。患者接受依托咪酯全凭静脉麻醉(PA 队列,n = 120)或挥发性麻醉(VA 队列,n = 185)进行择期消化道癌症根治性手术。年龄 > 50 岁(P =.0399)、体重指数 ≥ 25 kg/m2(P =.0423)、癌症 III 期(P =.0041)和癌症 IV 期(P =.0189)的患者接受挥发性麻醉。女性(P =.0346)、残疾患者(P =.0479)、Charlson 合并症指数 2 患者(P =.0449)、癌症 0 期或 I 期患者(P =.0141)和癌症 II 期患者(P =.0289)接受依托咪酯全凭静脉麻醉。两组患者的术后并发症(P =.9217)无统计学差异。在 3 年的随访期后,VA 队列中有 81 名(44%)患者和 PA 队列中有 63 名(52%)患者无论有无任何疾病均存活(P =.9918)。此外,在 3 年的随访期后,VA 队列中有 53 名(29%)患者和 PA 队列中有 42 名(35%)患者无癌症进展(P =.9981)。年龄 > 50 岁(P = 0.0491)、Charlson 合并症指数 ≥ 3(P = 0.0481)和癌症期 > II 期(P =.0412)是 3 年内手术治疗后因任何原因死亡的消化道癌症患者的独立参数。癌症根治性手术中麻醉剂的选择不影响 3 年随访期间患者的生存和消化道癌症患者的术后并发症(证据水平:III;技术功效阶段:4)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5aa/9302329/6508bde62cd2/medi-101-e29169-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5aa/9302329/57aa8e90e9be/medi-101-e29169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5aa/9302329/4929d997279b/medi-101-e29169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5aa/9302329/6508bde62cd2/medi-101-e29169-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5aa/9302329/57aa8e90e9be/medi-101-e29169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5aa/9302329/4929d997279b/medi-101-e29169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5aa/9302329/6508bde62cd2/medi-101-e29169-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries.挥发性麻醉与依托咪酯为基础的全静脉麻醉:回顾性分析接受择期消化道癌症根治性手术患者的图表。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 22;101(29):e29169. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029169.
2
Retrospective analysis of 1-year mortality after gastric cancer surgery: Total intravenous anesthesia versus volatile anesthesia.胃癌手术后 1 年死亡率的回顾性分析:全静脉麻醉与挥发性麻醉。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1169-1177. doi: 10.1111/aas.13414. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
3
Long-term Survival after Volatile or Propofol General Anesthesia for Bladder Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective National Registry Cohort Study.膀胱癌手术中使用挥发性或丙泊酚全身麻醉的长期生存:一项回顾性全国登记队列研究。
Anesthesiology. 2024 Jun 1;140(6):1126-1133. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004969.
4
Anesthesia and Long-term Oncological Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.麻醉与长期肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Mar 1;132(3):623-634. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005237.
5
Long-term oncological outcomes after oral cancer surgery using propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study.口腔癌手术后使用依托咪酯全凭静脉麻醉与七氟醚吸入麻醉的长期肿瘤学结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0268473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268473. eCollection 2022.
6
Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in limb-salvage surgery for osteosarcoma: A retrospective analysis.依托咪酯全凭静脉麻醉与地氟烷麻醉用于骨肉瘤保肢手术的生存结果比较:一项回顾性分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30840. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030840.
7
Volatile versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cancer Prognosis in Patients Having Digestive Cancer Surgery.静脉全身麻醉与挥发性麻醉对消化道癌症手术患者癌症预后的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Oct 1;133(4):764-773. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003440.
8
Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.丙泊酚静脉麻醉与地氟烷麻醉相比,可提高胰腺癌手术患者的生存率。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233598. eCollection 2020.
9
Impact of Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia on Long-term Survival After Cancer Surgery in a Nationwide Cohort.基于丙泊酚的全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉对全国队列癌症手术后长期生存的影响。
Ann Surg. 2023 Dec 1;278(6):1024-1031. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005568. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
10
Total intravenous anesthesia versus inhalation anesthesia: how do outcomes compare?全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉:结局如何比较?
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Aug 1;36(4):399-406. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001274. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of propofol on gastrointestinal cancer outcomes: A review of cellular behavior, growth, and metastasis.丙泊酚对胃肠道癌结局的影响:细胞行为、生长和转移的综述
World J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;16(7):104727. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i7.104727.
2
Effects of anesthesia on long-term survival in cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.麻醉对癌症手术长期生存的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 22;10(3):e24791. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24791. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.