Gordon D A, Hamm T M, Enoka R M, Reinking R M, Windhorst U, Stuart D G
J Neurosci Methods. 1987 Apr;19(4):267-84. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(87)90070-7.
In deeply anesthetized cats, determinations of motor-axonal conduction velocity (CV) were made using extracellular potentials recorded from single, functionally isolated motor axons innervating the muscle tibialis posterior. Axons were activated by suprathreshold electrical stimulation at the ventral-root level. Action potentials were recorded with 3 bipolar electrodes located on the muscle nerve at the level of the popliteal fossa. The most proximal and distal of the bipolar muscle-nerve electrodes were 16.4-22.0 mm apart. Estimates were made of CV from ventral root to muscle nerve (conventional CV) and between the proximal and the distal pairs of muscle-nerve electrodes (muscle-nerve CV). An evaluation was based on comparison of these CVs, estimates of uncertainties in time and distance measurements and simulations of the effects of recording conditions on CV estimates. The analysis indicated that the uncertainty in the conventional CV measurement of mammalian motor axons is at least +/- 2%. However, variability may be as great as 20% between muscle-nerve CV measurements from different experiments, probably due to such factors as regional variation in CV and differences in recording configuration.
在深度麻醉的猫身上,通过记录支配胫后肌的单根功能独立运动轴突的细胞外电位来测定运动轴突传导速度(CV)。轴突在腹根水平接受阈上电刺激激活。在腘窝水平的肌肉神经上用3个双极电极记录动作电位。双极肌肉神经电极最近端和最远端相距16.4 - 22.0毫米。对从腹根到肌肉神经的传导速度(传统CV)以及近端和远端双极肌肉神经电极之间的传导速度(肌肉神经CV)进行了估计。通过比较这些CV、时间和距离测量的不确定度估计以及记录条件对CV估计影响的模拟进行评估。分析表明,哺乳动物运动轴突传统CV测量的不确定度至少为±2%。然而,不同实验的肌肉神经CV测量之间的变异性可能高达20%,这可能是由于CV的区域差异和记录配置差异等因素造成的。