Suppr超能文献

成年猫在标准疲劳试验期间的运动单位力增强

Motor-unit force potentiation in adult cats during a standard fatigue test.

作者信息

Gordon D A, Enoka R M, Stuart D G

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85724.

出版信息

J Physiol. 1990 Feb;421:569-82. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp017962.

Abstract
  1. The purpose of this study was to examine the time course of tetanic force during a standard fatigue test and to distinguish between the appearance of potentiation and fatigue among the four motor-unit types of a cat hindlimb muscle. 2. Motor units of the tibialis posterior muscle in the adult cat were assigned to four categories (i.e. types S, FR, FI, FF) based on conventional criteria (Burke, Levine, Tsairis & Zajac, 1973). The mean (+/- S.D.) time course of peak force was constructed for each motor-unit type and, within each type, for those units that potentiated (a greater than 3% increase in peak force compared to the initial value) and those that did not potentiate. 3. The average time courses of force differed between motor-unit types. There was, however, considerable variability within each motor-unit type. For the same relative force output, the forces exerted by slow-twitch units were less variable than those exerted by fast-twitch units. In addition, the variability among slow-twitch units was relatively constant during the fatigue test while variability among fast-twitch units either increased or decreased with time. 4. For a given motor-unit type, the average time course of force did not depend on whether force in each tetanus was expressed as a peak value, an average peak value, or a force-time integral. 5. Some motor units within each type exhibited potentiation. Most of the variability in the time course of the peak force for each motor-unit type could be accounted for by the potentiating units. Motor units that exhibited only force decline (i.e. fatigue), regardless of unit type, had less variable time courses of peak force. Since potentiation was transient in some unit types, it was assumed that at least two opposing processes (i.e. fatigue and potentiation) occurred simultaneously in these units (see also, Krarup, 1981; Rankin, Enoka, Volz & Stuart, 1988; Garner, Hicks & McComas, 1989). 6. It is concluded that the expression of force potentiation throughout a fatiguing regimen is variable among motor units and that this is not related to conventional motor-unit types. This dissociation suggests that the mechanisms that form the basis for the conventional distinction between motor-unit types are different from those which lead to force potentiation.
摘要
  1. 本研究的目的是在标准疲劳测试期间检查强直力的时间进程,并区分成年猫后肢肌肉四种运动单位类型中增强和疲劳的表现。2. 根据传统标准(伯克、莱文、泰里斯和扎亚克,1973年),将成年猫胫骨后肌的运动单位分为四类(即S型、FR型、FI型、FF型)。为每种运动单位类型构建了峰值力的平均(±标准差)时间进程,并且在每种类型中,为那些增强的单位(与初始值相比峰值力增加超过3%)和那些未增强的单位构建了时间进程。3. 运动单位类型之间的力的平均时间进程不同。然而,每种运动单位类型内部存在相当大的变异性。对于相同的相对力输出,慢肌纤维单位施加的力比快肌纤维单位施加的力变异性小。此外,在疲劳测试期间,慢肌纤维单位之间的变异性相对恒定,而快肌纤维单位之间的变异性随时间增加或减少。4. 对于给定的运动单位类型,力的平均时间进程不取决于每个强直收缩中的力是表示为峰值、平均峰值还是力 - 时间积分。5. 每种类型中的一些运动单位表现出增强。每种运动单位类型的峰值力时间进程中的大部分变异性可由增强的单位来解释。无论单位类型如何,仅表现出力量下降(即疲劳)的运动单位的峰值力时间进程变异性较小。由于在某些单位类型中增强是短暂的,因此假设这些单位中至少同时发生了两个相反的过程(即疲劳和增强)(另见克拉鲁普,1981年;兰金、埃诺卡、沃尔兹和斯图尔特,1988年;加纳、希克斯和麦科马斯,1989年)。6. 得出的结论是,在整个疲劳过程中,力增强的表现因运动单位而异,并且这与传统的运动单位类型无关。这种分离表明,构成运动单位类型传统区分基础的机制与导致力增强的机制不同。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验