Karamian Brian A, Lambrechts Mark J, Sirch Francis, Gupta Sachin, D'Antonio Nicholas D, Levy Hannah, Reiter David, Dolhse Nico, Qureshi Mahir, Mao Jennifer, Canseco Jose A, Woods Barrett I, Kaye Ian David, Hilibrand Alan, Kepler Christopher K, Vaccaro Alexander R, Schroeder Gregory D
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Nov 1;47(21):1497-1504. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004405. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
This is a retrospective cohort study.
The aim was to evaluate differences in readmission rates, number of debridements, and length of antibiotic therapy when comparing bacterial gram type following lumbar spinal fusion infections.
Surgical site infections (SSIs) after spinal fusion serve as a significant source of patient morbidity. It remains to be elucidated how bacterial classification of the infecting organism affects the management of postoperative spinal SSI.
Patients who underwent spinal fusion with a subsequent diagnosis of SSI between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patients were grouped based on bacterial infection type (gram-positive, gram-negative, or mixed infections). Poisson regressions analyzed the relationship between the type of bacterial infection and the number of irrigation and debridement (I&D) reoperations, and the duration of intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. Significance was set at P <0.05.
Of 190 patients, 92 had gram-positive (G+) infections, 57 had gram-negative (G-) infections, and 33 had mixed (M) infections. There was no difference in 30 or 90-day readmissions for infection between groups (both P =0.051). Patients in the M group had longer durations of IV antibiotic treatment (G+: 46.4 vs. G-: 41.0 vs. M: 55.9 d, P =0.002). Regression analysis demonstrated mixed infections were 46% more likely to require a greater number of debridements ( P =0.001) and 18% more likely to require an increased duration of IV antibiotic therapy ( P <0.001), while gram-negative infections were 10% less likely to require an increased duration of IV antibiotic therapy ( P <0.001) when compared with G- infections.
Spinal SSI due to a mixed bacterial gram type results in an increased number of debridements and a longer duration of IV antibiotics required to resolve the infection compared with gram-negative or gram-positive infections.
Level III.
这是一项回顾性队列研究。
旨在比较腰椎融合术后感染的细菌革兰氏类型时,评估再入院率、清创次数和抗生素治疗时长的差异。
脊柱融合术后手术部位感染(SSIs)是患者发病的重要来源。感染病原体的细菌分类如何影响术后脊柱SSI的管理仍有待阐明。
回顾性确定2013年至2019年间接受脊柱融合术且随后诊断为SSI的患者。患者根据细菌感染类型(革兰氏阳性、革兰氏阴性或混合感染)分组。泊松回归分析了细菌感染类型与冲洗和清创(I&D)再次手术次数以及静脉(IV)抗生素治疗持续时间之间的关系。显著性设定为P<0.05。
190例患者中,92例为革兰氏阳性(G+)感染,57例为革兰氏阴性(G-)感染,33例为混合(M)感染。各组之间感染的30天或90天再入院率无差异(P均=0.051)。M组患者的IV抗生素治疗持续时间更长(G+:46.4天 vs. G-:41.0天 vs. M:55.9天,P =0.002)。回归分析表明,与G+感染相比,混合感染需要更多清创次数的可能性高46%(P =0.001),需要延长IV抗生素治疗持续时间的可能性高18%(P<0.001),而革兰氏阴性感染需要延长IV抗生素治疗持续时间的可能性低10%(P<0.001)。
与革兰氏阴性或革兰氏阳性感染相比,混合细菌革兰氏类型引起的脊柱SSI导致清创次数增加,解决感染所需的IV抗生素治疗持续时间更长。
三级。