• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在低收入和中等收入国家开展以患者为导向的研究:一项范围综述

Conducting Patient-Oriented Research in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Ibitoye Bukola Mary, Garrett Bernie, Ranger Manon, Stinson Jennifer

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara, Nigeria.

出版信息

Patient. 2023 Jan;16(1):19-29. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00592-w. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-022-00592-w
PMID:35869330
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-oriented research involves extensive collaboration with patients, their families, caregivers, clinicians and other relevant stakeholders to identify and investigate problems and outcomes relevant to patients. Patient-oriented research can help develop effective patient-centred interventions. Patient-oriented research is an increasingly used approach in high-income countries, but it is unclear how patients are engaged in research in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this scoping review was to explore how patient-oriented research is conducted in LMICs. The objectives were to determine the levels of involvement of patients in the research, how studies have impacted healthcare and patient outcomes in these countries, the reported benefits of patient-oriented research on the research process and the reported challenges of conducting patient-oriented research in LMICs.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted using the methodological framework suggested by Arksey and O'Malley and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for conducting scoping reviews. The eligibility criteria were any healthcare research using any research design that involved patients of any age group in the research process. Six databases were searched from their inception till January 4, 2022: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsychInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EBM Reviews. The reference lists of relevant articles and Google Scholar were combed as well. Data extraction was performed with a self-developed data extraction guide. The findings were narratively summarised.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles were included in this scoping review, representing eight LMICs in Africa and Asia. The majority of studies (38%, n = 5) focused on patients living with human immunodeficiency virus. More than half of the studies (n = 8, 62%) were conducted in the adult population, 31% (n = 4) of the studies involved children and/or adolescents. For most of the studies (92%, n = 12), the participants served as consultants; for one study, the authors identified the participants as co-researchers. Across the studies, information regarding patient-oriented research activities was not consistently reported in the same manner (i.e. different locations in the article), with very limited information in some cases. None of the studies used a patient-oriented research framework and the majority did not report on how patient-oriented research impacted healthcare and patient outcomes. Patient-oriented research was beneficial in identifying relevant patients' needs and improving collaboration among stakeholders, but it also led to extended research timelines and increased financial costs for the researchers and patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers in LMICs are incorporating patient-oriented research in their research; however, there is a need for improved reporting practices in published articles, and the use of frameworks to guide patient-oriented research in LMICs. In LMICs, patient-oriented research enhances collaboration across stakeholders and gives patients a sense of ownership over the interventions and research process. Future work should focus on developing contextually relevant conceptual frameworks and further studies should explore the impact of patient-oriented research on healthcare and patient outcomes in the LMIC context.

摘要

背景

以患者为导向的研究涉及与患者、其家人、护理人员、临床医生及其他相关利益相关者广泛合作,以识别和研究与患者相关的问题及结果。以患者为导向的研究有助于开发有效的以患者为中心的干预措施。在高收入国家,以患者为导向的研究是一种越来越常用的方法,但目前尚不清楚低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的患者如何参与研究。

目的

本范围综述的目的是探讨在LMICs中如何开展以患者为导向的研究。目标是确定患者在研究中的参与程度、这些国家的研究如何影响医疗保健和患者结局、所报告的以患者为导向的研究对研究过程的益处以及在LMICs开展以患者为导向的研究所报告的挑战。

方法

使用Arksey和O'Malley建议的方法框架以及乔安娜·布里格斯研究所开展范围综述的指南进行范围综述。纳入标准为任何使用任何研究设计且在研究过程中涉及任何年龄组患者的医疗保健研究。检索了六个数据库,从其创建至2022年1月4日:医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引、心理学文摘数据库(PsychInfo)、考克兰对照试验中心注册库和循证医学综述。还梳理了相关文章的参考文献列表和谷歌学术。使用自行开发的数据提取指南进行数据提取。对研究结果进行了叙述性总结。

结果

本范围综述纳入了13篇文章,代表了非洲和亚洲的8个LMICs。大多数研究(38%,n = 5)关注感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的患者。超过一半的研究(n = 8,62%)针对成年人群体开展,31%(n = 4)的研究涉及儿童和/或青少年。对于大多数研究(92%,n = 12),参与者担任顾问;一项研究中,作者将参与者确定为共同研究者。在所有研究中,关于以患者为导向的研究活动的信息并非以一致的方式报告(即文章中的不同位置),在某些情况下信息非常有限。没有一项研究使用以患者为导向的研究框架,大多数研究也未报告以患者为导向的研究如何影响医疗保健和患者结局。以患者为导向的研究有助于确定患者的相关需求并改善利益相关者之间的合作,但也导致研究时间延长,研究人员和患者的财务成本增加。

结论

LMICs的研究人员正在将以患者为导向的研究纳入其研究中;然而,已发表文章的报告做法需要改进,并且需要使用框架来指导LMICs中的以患者为导向的研究。在LMICs中,以患者为导向的研究加强了利益相关者之间的合作,并使患者对干预措施和研究过程有主人翁意识。未来的工作应侧重于开发与背景相关的概念框架,进一步的研究应探讨在LMICs背景下以患者为导向的研究对医疗保健和患者结局的影响。

相似文献

1
Conducting Patient-Oriented Research in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.在低收入和中等收入国家开展以患者为导向的研究:一项范围综述
Patient. 2023 Jan;16(1):19-29. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00592-w. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Mapping evidence of the concomitant management of schistosomiasis by traditional health practitioners and health care professionals in communities with high prevalent infections: a systematic scoping review protocol.绘制高流行区社区中传统卫生从业者和卫生保健专业人员共同管理血吸虫病的证据图谱:系统范围界定综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 18;8(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1088-3.
6
A scoping review of stroke services within the Philippines.菲律宾脑卒中服务的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11334-z.
7
Contraceptive dynamics among women with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.中低收入国家残疾妇女避孕动态:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02214-4.
8
Health research mentorship in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.健康研究指导在中低收入国家:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Oct 1;21(10):1912-1970. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00260.
9
Barriers to and facilitators of clinician acceptance and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare settings: a scoping review.医疗环境中临床医生接受和使用人工智能的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):e092624. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092624.
10
Sexual and reproductive health among forcibly displaced persons in urban environments in low and middle-income countries: scoping review findings.中低收入国家城市环境中被迫流离失所者的性与生殖健康:范围综述结果。
Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 12;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01780-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Involvement of children and young people in the conduct of health research: A rapid umbrella review.儿童和青少年参与健康研究的情况:快速伞式综述。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14081. doi: 10.1111/hex.14081.