• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孤立腘动脉病变腔内治疗的性别差异。

Sex Differences in Endovascular Treatment of Isolated Popliteal Lesions.

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Augusta Hospital and Catholic Hospital Group, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Germany Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Sep;45(9):1267-1275. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03216-w. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00270-022-03216-w
PMID:35869397
Abstract

PURPOSE

Sex-based differences in peripheral arterial disease are well-known. Aim of this study was to evaluate sex-related disparities in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of isolated popliteal artery lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1th January 2004 and 1th January 2021 304 patients underwent endovascular treatment of an isolated popliteal artery lesion at three vascular centers. A retrospective analysis was performed comparing the outcomes in female versus male patients.

RESULTS

The majority of the patients were female (51.3%). Male patients were younger (70.4 vs. 76.8 years, p < 0.01). Hyperlipidemia (62.2% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.01) and diabetes (62% vs. 40%, p < 0.01) were more common in male group. There were more current and former smokers in the male group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01). There were no differences regarding lesion length (mean 94.5 mm) nor location of the lesion. Technical success was comparable in both groups 94.6% vs. 97.4%), no differences in terms of in-hospital complications (9.5% vs. 7.7%) were found. At 3 years estimates did not demonstrate any difference in terms of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (23% vs. 34%), secondary patency (86% vs. 96%), and all-cause mortality (77% vs. 67%) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In our experience the female sex showed clinical signs of popliteal artery lesion at higher age with less aggressive atherosclerotic risk factors. However, during the follow-up no sex-related significant differences were found in terms of morphological and clinical outcomes after endovascular revascularization.

摘要

目的

众所周知,外周动脉疾病存在性别差异。本研究旨在评估接受腔内治疗孤立性腘动脉病变的患者中与性别相关的差异。

材料和方法

在 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 1 月 1 日期间,有 304 名患者在三个血管中心接受了孤立性腘动脉病变的腔内治疗。对女性与男性患者的结局进行了回顾性分析。

结果

大多数患者为女性(51.3%)。男性患者年龄较小(70.4 岁比 76.8 岁,p<0.01)。男性高脂血症(62.2%比 45.5%,p<0.01)和糖尿病(62%比 40%,p<0.01)更为常见。男性中现吸烟者和既往吸烟者更多(p=0.04 和 p=0.01)。两组患者的病变长度(平均 94.5mm)和病变位置无差异。两组的技术成功率相当(94.6%比 97.4%),住院并发症无差异(9.5%比 7.7%)。3 年时,两组在临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(23%比 34%)、次要通畅率(86%比 96%)和全因死亡率(77%比 67%)方面均无差异。

结论

根据我们的经验,女性发生腘动脉病变的临床征象出现在更高的年龄,且动脉粥样硬化的风险因素较少。然而,在随访中,腔内血管重建后的形态学和临床结局方面,没有发现与性别相关的显著差异。

相似文献

1
Sex Differences in Endovascular Treatment of Isolated Popliteal Lesions.孤立腘动脉病变腔内治疗的性别差异。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Sep;45(9):1267-1275. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03216-w. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
Effectiveness of combined superficial femoral artery endovascular therapy with popliteal-to-distal bypass: A paradigm shift in surgical open bypass for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.股浅动脉腔内治疗联合腘动脉至远端旁路移植术的有效性:慢性肢体威胁性缺血手术开放旁路移植术的范式转变。
Vascular. 2021 Dec;29(6):905-912. doi: 10.1177/1708538120981224. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
3
Gender-related long-term outcome of primary femoropopliteal stent placement for peripheral artery disease.外周动脉疾病初次股腘动脉支架置入术的性别相关长期预后
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Feb;22(1):31-7. doi: 10.1177/1526602814564382.
4
The United States StuDy for EvalUating EndovasculaR TreAtments of Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal By usIng the Protégé EverfLex NitInol STent SYstem II (DURABILITY II).美国评估使用 Protégé Everflex Nitinol STent System II(耐久性 II)治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉近端病变的研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):73-83.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.066. Epub 2013 May 2.
5
Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy vs Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Isolated Popliteal Artery Lesions.抗再狭窄治疗的定向斑块旋切术与单纯药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗孤立性腘动脉病变的比较
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):181-188. doi: 10.1177/1526602816683933. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
6
Iliac Artery Stenting Combined with Ipsilateral Open Femoro-Popliteal Revascularization and Its Effect on Bypass Patency.髂动脉支架置入联合同侧股腘动脉开放血管重建术及其对旁路通畅率的影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;44:282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 May 5.
7
Increased mortality with paclitaxel-eluting stents is driven by lesion length.紫杉醇洗脱支架增加死亡率是由病变长度驱动的。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):548-553.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.061. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
Stenting for peripheral artery disease of the lower extremities: an evidence-based analysis.下肢外周动脉疾病的支架置入术:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(18):1-88. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
9
The association of statin therapy with the primary patency of femoral and popliteal artery stents.他汀类药物治疗与股动脉和腘动脉支架原发性通畅率的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 May;67(5):1472-1479. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.022. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
A single center experience of Zilver PTX for femoro-popliteal lesions.关于Zilver PTX治疗股腘病变的单中心经验。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Sep;17(6):399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between psoriasis and peripheral artery occlusive disease: a population-based retrospective cohort study.银屑病与外周动脉闭塞性疾病之间的关联:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 12;10:1136540. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1136540. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex-Related Differences in the Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease Treated with the IN.PACT Drug-Coated Balloon in the IN.PACT SFA Randomized Controlled Trial: A Post Hoc Analysis.IN.PACT SFA随机对照试验中使用IN.PACT药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉疾病患者长期预后的性别差异:一项事后分析
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Sep;31(9):1410-1418.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.05.012.
2
Clinical impact of sex on carotid revascularization.性别对颈动脉血运重建的临床影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 May;71(5):1587-1594.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.088. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
3
Gender differences on mortality and re-interventions after TEVAR for intact aneurysms of the thoracic aorta.
胸主动脉完整动脉瘤腔内修复术后死亡率及再次干预的性别差异
Int Angiol. 2019 Apr;38(2):115-120. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.19.04158-0. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
4
Screening for Peripheral Artery Disease and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment With the Ankle-Brachial Index: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.采用踝臂指数筛查外周动脉疾病和心血管疾病风险评估:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 Jul 10;320(2):177-183. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8357.
5
Sex-Based Assessment of Patient Presentation, Lesion Characteristics, and Treatment Modalities in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Vascular Intervention.基于性别的外周血管介入治疗患者临床表现、病变特征和治疗方式评估。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan;11(1):e005749. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005749.
6
The effect of gender on outcomes after lower extremity revascularization.性别对下肢血管重建术后结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):889-906.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.030.
7
Comparison of Lower Extremity Endovascular Intervention Outcomes in Women Versus Men.女性与男性下肢血管内介入治疗结果的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;119(3):490-496. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
8
Endovascular Abdominal Aneurysm Repair in Women: What are the Differences Between the Genders?女性腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复:两性之间有哪些差异?
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):232-238. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20160047.
9
Gender differences in patients with carotid stenosis.颈动脉狭窄患者的性别差异。
Vasa. 2016 Jan;45(1):11-6. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000490.
10
Evolution of gender-related differences in outcomes from two decades of endovascular aneurysm repair.二十年来血管内动脉瘤修复术后结果中性别相关差异的演变
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;61(4):843-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.006. Epub 2015 Jan 13.