Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Emergency Department, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Oct;58(10):1847-1854. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16127. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
To explore factors influencing fever management practices and antipyretic use among New Zealand Emergency Department (ED) doctors and nurses using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).
Cross-sectional survey of doctors and nurses across 11 New Zealand EDs. The questionnaire examined eight of 12 TDF domains, based on a generic questionnaire validated to assess TDF-based determinants of health-care professional behaviour. Relevant domains were identified by the frequency of beliefs; the presence of conflicting beliefs within a domain; and the likely strength of impact of a belief on paediatric fever management in the ED.
About 602 participants (243 doctors, 353 nurses and 6 unknown) completed the survey (response rate 47.5%). Over half (351/591, 59.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 55.5-63.5%) knew the content of clinical practice guidelines regarding antipyretic use in febrile children (TDF Domain Knowledge), or had been trained to ensure antipyretics are given to febrile children only if they appear distressed (347/592, 58.6%, 95% CI 54.5-62.6%) (Skills). Over 40% (246/590, 95% CI 37.7-45.8%) aim to reduce the fever before discharge (Goals). Most (444/591, 75.1%, 95% CI 71.4-78.6%) participants felt capable of explaining appropriate antipyretic use to parents/care givers (Beliefs about Capabilities). Only a minority (155/584, 26.5%, 95% CI 23.0-30.3%) thought that they can ensure antipyretics are given to febrile children only if they appear distressed when the ED is busy (Environmental Context and Resources).
Using the TDF, we identified factors influencing fever management practices and antipyretic use in the ED. These factors can guide the design of targeted, theory-informed knowledge translation strategies.
使用理论领域框架(TDF)探索影响新西兰急诊科(ED)医生和护士发热管理实践和退热药物使用的因素。
对 11 家新西兰 ED 的医生和护士进行横断面调查。问卷根据一项经过验证的评估医疗保健专业人员行为基于 TDF 的决定因素的通用问卷,检查了 TDF 的 12 个领域中的 8 个。相关领域是根据信念的频率;一个领域内是否存在相互矛盾的信念;以及信念对 ED 中儿科发热管理的潜在影响强度来确定的。
约 602 名参与者(243 名医生、353 名护士和 6 名未知)完成了调查(应答率为 47.5%)。超过一半(351/591,59.6%,95%置信区间[CI] 55.5-63.5%)了解退热药物使用临床实践指南的内容(TDF 领域知识),或接受过培训,以确保仅在发热儿童出现不适时给予退热药物(347/592,58.6%,95%CI 54.5-62.6%)(技能)。超过 40%(246/590,95%CI 37.7-45.8%)的目标是在出院前降低体温(目标)。大多数(444/591,75.1%,95%CI 71.4-78.6%)参与者认为自己能够向父母/照顾者解释适当的退热药物使用(信念关于能力)。只有少数(155/584,26.5%,95%CI 23.0-30.3%)认为,当 ED 忙碌时,他们可以确保仅在发热儿童出现不适时给予退热药物(环境背景和资源)。
使用 TDF,我们确定了影响 ED 发热管理实践和退热药物使用的因素。这些因素可以指导有针对性的、基于理论的知识转化策略的设计。