• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗血管内皮生长因子治疗伴或不伴青光眼的视网膜分支静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿——青光眼是否会影响抗VEGF注射后视网膜分支静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿患者的视力预后?

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema in Eyes with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with vs Without Glaucoma - Does Glaucoma Affect Visual Outcome in Eyes with BRVO-ME After antiVEGF Injections?

作者信息

Asami Shin, Sugimoto Masahiko, Tsukitome Hideyuki, Kato Kumiko, Matsubara Hisashi, Kondo Mineo

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 15;16:2275-2283. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S356727. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S356727
PMID:35872969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9296876/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the therapeutic effects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in eyes with macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO-ME) with glaucoma to those without glaucoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of Mie University Hospital from 2013 to 2017. Patients were recruited if they had received anti-VEGF agents for BRVO-ME treatment and included 30 patients (30 eyes) without glaucoma (G[-] group) and 27 patients (27 eyes) with glaucoma (G[+] group). The central retinal thickness (CRT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months after a single injection of anti-VEGF agents were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Before treatment, the mean±standard deviation of the CRT was 514.2±117.3 μm for the G[-] group, which was not significantly different from that for the G[+] group (533.4±171.4 μm). The CRT in the G[-] and G[+] groups significantly reduced to 321.1±114.6 μm and 347.8±134.7 μm, respectively, at 1 month after the injection and to 360.4±159.5 μm and 352.4±151.9 μm, respectively, at 3 months after the injection (<0.01 for each group). The difference in the degree of CRT reduction between the two groups was not significant. Before treatment, the BCVA was 0.42±0.32 logMAR units in the G[-] group and 0.57±0.33 logMAR units in the G[+] group, showing no significant difference. The BCVA in the G[-] and G[+] groups improved significantly to 0.27±0.26 logMAR units and 0.34±0.42 logMAR units, respectively, at 1 month, and to 0.18±0.20 logMAR units and 0.39±0.34 logMAR units, respectively, at 3 months (<0.01). The BCVA in the G[-] group was significantly better than that in the G[+] group at 3 months (=0.02).

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic response of anti-VEGF agents for BRVO-ME is affected by the presence of glaucoma.

摘要

目的

比较抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)药物对视网膜分支静脉阻塞相关性黄斑水肿合并青光眼(BRVO-ME)患者与不合并青光眼患者眼睛的治疗效果。

患者与方法

本回顾性研究使用了三重大学医院2013年至2017年的病历。纳入接受抗VEGF药物治疗BRVO-ME的患者,包括30例无青光眼患者(30只眼)(G[-]组)和27例青光眼患者(27只眼)(G[+]组)。比较两组单次注射抗VEGF药物后3个月时的中心视网膜厚度(CRT)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。

结果

治疗前,G[-]组CRT的平均值±标准差为514.2±117.3μm,与G[+]组(533.4±171.4μm)无显著差异。注射后1个月,G[-]组和G[+]组的CRT分别显著降至321.1±114.6μm和347.8±134.7μm,注射后3个月分别降至360.4±159.5μm和352.4±151.9μm(每组P<0.01)。两组CRT降低程度的差异不显著。治疗前,G[-]组的BCVA为0.42±0.32 logMAR单位,G[+]组为0.57±0.33 logMAR单位,无显著差异。G[-]组和G[+]组的BCVA在1个月时分别显著改善至0.27±0.26 logMAR单位和0.34±0.42 logMAR单位,在3个月时分别改善至0.18±0.20 logMAR单位和0.39±0.34 logMAR单位(P<0.01)。3个月时,G[-]组的BCVA显著优于G[+]组(P=0.02)。

结论

抗VEGF药物对BRVO-ME的治疗反应受青光眼的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc0/9296876/8d41ac5be3ad/OPTH-16-2275-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc0/9296876/8d41ac5be3ad/OPTH-16-2275-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc0/9296876/8d41ac5be3ad/OPTH-16-2275-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema in Eyes with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with vs Without Glaucoma - Does Glaucoma Affect Visual Outcome in Eyes with BRVO-ME After antiVEGF Injections?抗血管内皮生长因子治疗伴或不伴青光眼的视网膜分支静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿——青光眼是否会影响抗VEGF注射后视网膜分支静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿患者的视力预后?
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 15;16:2275-2283. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S356727. eCollection 2022.
2
Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with retinal vein occlusion resistant to anti-VEGF therapy: a 12-month prospective study.玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入物治疗抗VEGF治疗耐药的视网膜静脉阻塞患者的疗效和安全性:一项为期12个月的前瞻性研究。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2019 Dec;38(4):330-337. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2019.1614020. Epub 2019 May 27.
3
Predictive factors for functional improvement after intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.预测因子分析:玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿的功能改善。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;249(2):183-92. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1470-2. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
4
Functional and anatomical results after a single intravitreal Ozurdex injection in retinal vein occlusion: a 6-month follow-up -- the SOLO study.单剂量玻璃体内注射地塞米松Ozurdex 治疗视网膜静脉阻塞的功能和解剖学结果:6 个月随访——SOLO 研究。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;91(5):e340-7. doi: 10.1111/aos.12020. Epub 2013 May 3.
5
Clinical Use of Dexamethasone Implants in Resistant Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vascular Occlusion Compared with Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor.地塞米松植入物在视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发的难治性黄斑水肿中的临床应用与玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的比较
Beyoglu Eye J. 2019 Apr 10;4(1):11-16. doi: 10.14744/bej.2019.63835. eCollection 2019.
6
Foveal Thickness Fluctuation in Anti-VEGF Treatment for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Long-term Study.抗 VEGF 治疗分支视网膜静脉阻塞的中心凹厚度波动:一项长期研究。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 Jul;6(7):567-574. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
7
Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion stratified by baseline visual acuity.玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞后黄斑水肿的疗效,按基线视力分层分析
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;255(4):691-697. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3535-3. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
8
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.抗血管内皮生长因子治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发的黄斑水肿
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD009510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009510.pub3.
9
Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, oral glucocorticoids, and laser photocoagulation combination therapy for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: preliminary report.玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子药物、口服糖皮质激素和激光光凝联合治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿:初步报告
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 18;11(3):429-437. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.03.13. eCollection 2018.
10
Safety and long-term efficacy of repeated dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion with or without a switch to anti-VEGF agents: a 3-year experience.重复玻璃体内注射地塞米松治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发的黄斑囊样水肿(无论是否转换为抗血管内皮生长因子药物)的安全性和长期疗效:一项为期3年的经验
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;256(8):1441-1448. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4016-7. Epub 2018 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Optical coherence tomography angiography and Humphrey field analyser for macular capillary non-perfusion evaluation in branch retinal vein occlusion.光学相干断层扫描血管造影和 Humphrey 视野分析仪评估分支视网膜静脉阻塞的黄斑毛细血管无灌注。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4583. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84240-7.
2
Status of Choriocapillaris in Fellow Eyes of Patients With Unilateral Retinal Vein Occlusions.单侧视网膜静脉阻塞患者对侧眼脉络膜毛细血管状态。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021 Jan 1;52(1):23-28. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20201223-05.
3
The effects of intravitreal injections on intraocular pressure and retinal nerve fiber layer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
玻璃体腔内注射对眼压和视网膜神经纤维层的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 6;10(1):13248. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70269-7.
4
Prognostic Value of Hyperreflective Material on Visual Acuity in Treatment-Naïve BRVO.治疗初发 BRVO 中高反射性物质对视敏度的预后价值。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020 Jun 1;51(6):320-327. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20200603-02.
5
Intravitreal conbercept for branch retinal vein occlusion induced macular edema: one initial injection versus three monthly injections.玻璃体内康柏西普治疗分支型视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿:单次注射与每月 3 次注射的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 11;20(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01494-x.
6
Cystoid macular edema related to cataract surgery and topical prostaglandin analogs: Mechanism, diagnosis, and management.与白内障手术和局部前列腺素类似物相关的囊样黄斑水肿:发病机制、诊断和治疗。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep-Oct;65(5):496-512. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
7
Clinical Effectiveness of Intravitreal Therapy With Ranibizumab vs Aflibercept vs Bevacizumab for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.雷珠单抗、阿柏西普与贝伐单抗玻璃体内注射治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的临床疗效:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 1;137(11):1256-1264. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3305.
8
Association of glaucoma with risk of retinal vein occlusion: A meta-analysis.青光眼与视网膜静脉阻塞风险的关联:一项荟萃分析。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;97(7):652-659. doi: 10.1111/aos.14141. Epub 2019 May 24.
9
Comparison of one and three initial monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injection in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿患者初始每月一次与每月三次玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗的比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep 18;11(9):1534-1538. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.09.17. eCollection 2018.
10
Comparative efficacy of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普治疗视网膜静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Sep;11(9):903-916. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1507735. Epub 2018 Aug 10.