• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高围手术期风险评分在急诊剖腹术中的应用:全国质量改进计划。

Increasing the use of perioperative risk scoring in emergency laparotomy: nationwide quality improvement programme.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2022 Jul 7;6(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac092.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrac092
PMID:35876188
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9309802/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency laparotomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The early identification of high-risk patients allows for timely perioperative care and appropriate resource allocation. The aim of this study was to develop a nationwide surgical trainee-led quality improvement (QI) programme to increase the use of perioperative risk scoring in emergency laparotomy.

METHODS

The programme was structured using the active implementation framework in 15 state-funded Irish hospitals to guide the staged implementation of perioperative risk scoring. The primary outcome was a recorded preoperative risk score for patients undergoing an emergency laparotomy at each site.

RESULTS

The rate of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy receiving a perioperative risk score increased from 0-11 per cent during the exploratory phase to 35-100 per cent during the full implementation phase. Crucial factors for implementing changes included an experienced central team providing implementation support, collaborator engagement, and effective communication and social relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

A trainee-led QI programme increased the use of perioperative risk assessment in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, with the potential to improve patient outcomes and care delivery.

摘要

背景

急诊剖腹手术与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。早期识别高危患者有助于及时进行围手术期护理和适当的资源分配。本研究的目的是开发一项全国性的外科实习生主导的质量改进(QI)计划,以增加在急诊剖腹手术中使用围手术期风险评分。

方法

该计划使用主动实施框架在 15 家由国家资助的爱尔兰医院中进行结构化,以指导围手术期风险评分的分阶段实施。主要结果是记录每个站点接受急诊剖腹手术的患者的术前风险评分。

结果

接受围手术期风险评分的急诊剖腹手术患者比例从探索阶段的 0-11%增加到全面实施阶段的 35-100%。实施变革的关键因素包括经验丰富的中央团队提供实施支持、合作者的参与以及有效的沟通和社交关系。

结论

实习生主导的 QI 计划增加了在接受急诊剖腹手术的患者中进行围手术期风险评估的使用,有可能改善患者的预后和护理效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea0/9309802/23bd7217e9eb/zrac092f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea0/9309802/dcb7c06efd48/zrac092f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea0/9309802/57562d2a9614/zrac092f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea0/9309802/e3f265a1b967/zrac092f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea0/9309802/23bd7217e9eb/zrac092f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea0/9309802/dcb7c06efd48/zrac092f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea0/9309802/57562d2a9614/zrac092f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea0/9309802/e3f265a1b967/zrac092f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea0/9309802/23bd7217e9eb/zrac092f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Increasing the use of perioperative risk scoring in emergency laparotomy: nationwide quality improvement programme.提高围手术期风险评分在急诊剖腹术中的应用:全国质量改进计划。
BJS Open. 2022 Jul 7;6(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac092.
2
Improving care at scale: process evaluation of a multi-component quality improvement intervention to reduce mortality after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH trial).规模化改善医疗服务:一项多环节质量改进干预措施以降低急诊腹部手术后死亡率的效果评价(EPOCH 试验)。
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 13;13(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0823-9.
3
Quality improvement and emergency laparotomy care: what have we learnt from recent major QI efforts?质量改进和急诊剖腹手术护理:我们从最近的重大质量改进努力中学到了什么?
Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Nov;19(6):454-457. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019.0251.
4
Evaluation of the Collaborative Use of an Evidence-Based Care Bundle in Emergency Laparotomy.评价基于循证的护理捆绑在急诊剖腹术中的联合应用。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):e190145. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0145. Epub 2019 May 15.
5
6
Two-year outcomes from the Australian and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit-Quality Improvement pilot study.澳大利亚和新西兰急诊剖腹手术审计-质量改进试点研究的两年期结果。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Dec;91(12):2575-2582. doi: 10.1111/ans.17037. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
7
Use of a pathway quality improvement care bundle to reduce mortality after emergency laparotomy.使用路径质量改进护理包降低急诊剖腹手术后的死亡率。
Br J Surg. 2015 Jan;102(1):57-66. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9658. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
8
Association between preadmission frailty and care level at discharge in older adults undergoing emergency laparotomy.老年急诊剖腹术患者入院前虚弱与出院时护理水平的关系。
Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):218-226. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11392. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.国家质量改进计划对提高急诊腹部手术后生存的效果(EPOCH):一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 1;393(10187):2213-2221. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32521-2. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
The Elderly Emergency Laparotomy Patient - More Than Just the Operation.老年急诊剖腹手术患者——不仅仅是手术。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2019 Nov;48(11):382-385.

本文引用的文献

1
Volume and in-hospital mortality after emergency abdominal surgery: a national population-based study.急诊腹部手术后的容量与院内死亡率:一项基于全国人口的研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 2;9(11):e032183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032183.
2
Hospital-level evaluation of the effect of a national quality improvement programme: time-series analysis of registry data.医院层面评估国家质量改进计划效果:基于登记数据的时间序列分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Aug;29(8):623-635. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009537. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
3
Emergency laparotomy research methodology: A systematic review.
紧急剖腹手术研究方法学:系统评价。
Surgeon. 2020 Apr;18(2):80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
Frailty in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: Results From the UK Observational Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty (ELF) Study.老年急诊剖腹手术患者的脆弱性:来自英国观察性急诊剖腹手术和脆弱性(ELF)研究的结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):709-718. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003402.
5
Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.国家质量改进计划对提高急诊腹部手术后生存的效果(EPOCH):一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 1;393(10187):2213-2221. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32521-2. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
Evaluation of the Collaborative Use of an Evidence-Based Care Bundle in Emergency Laparotomy.评价基于循证的护理捆绑在急诊剖腹术中的联合应用。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):e190145. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0145. Epub 2019 May 15.
7
Organisational factors and mortality after an emergency laparotomy: multilevel analysis of 39 903 National Emergency Laparotomy Audit patients.手术紧急程度与术后死亡率的相关性:39903 例全国急诊剖腹手术调查的多水平分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Dec;121(6):1346-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.040. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
8
Critical differences between elective and emergency surgery: identifying domains for quality improvement in emergency general surgery.择期手术和急诊手术的关键差异:确定急诊普通外科质量改进的领域。
Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):832-838. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.11.017. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
9
Measuring Outcomes of Clinical Care: Victorian Emergency Laparotomy Audit Using Quality Investigator.衡量临床护理结果:使用质量调查员进行的维多利亚州急诊剖腹手术审计
World J Surg. 2018 Jul;42(7):1981-1987. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4418-4.
10
Five years of Experience using Front-Line Ownership to Improve Healthcare Quality and Safety.运用一线自主管理提升医疗质量与安全的五年经验
Healthc Pap. 2017;17(1):8-23. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2017.25339.