• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗哌卡因会阴浸润用于会阴切开修复产后疼痛管理:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

Ropivacaine perineal infiltration for postpartum pain management in episiotomy repair: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.

Federative Pelvic Pain Centre, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.

出版信息

BJOG. 2024 Jun;131(7):899-907. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17266. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17266
PMID:35876236
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether perineal infiltration of ropivacaine after episiotomy would decrease the incidence of postpartum pain compared with placebo.

DESIGN

Two-centre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

SETTING

Two French maternity units, October 2017 to April 2020.

POPULATION

272 women undergoing epidural analgesia with vaginal singleton delivery and mediolateral episiotomy at term (≥37 weeks) were randomly allocated perineal infiltration of ropivacaine (n = 135) or placebo (n = 137) in a 1:1 ratio before episiotomy repair.

METHODS

Patients were followed at short term (12, 24, 48 h), mid-term (day 7) and long-term (3 and 6 months).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the rate of perineal pain, defined by a Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) exceeding 3/10, in the mid-term (day 7) postpartum period. Secondary outcomes were perineal pain (NPRS) and analgesic intake, quality of life (SF-36), postpartum depression (EPDS), pain neuropathic component (DN4) and sexual health (FSFI).

RESULTS

Perineal pain occurred to an equal extent in the ropivacaine and placebo groups at day 7 (34.2% versus 30.4%, odds ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.7-1.8, p = 0.63). Similar results were recorded in the short and long term. High rates of dyspareunia and postpartum depression were documented in both groups. No differences were highlighted between the groups in terms of analgesic intake, adverse events, pain neuropathic component and postpartum quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not demonstrate any benefit of ropivacaine infiltration over placebo.

摘要

目的

研究会阴侧切术后局部浸润罗哌卡因是否会降低产后疼痛的发生率,与安慰剂相比。

设计

两中心、双盲、随机、对照试验。

地点

2017 年 10 月至 2020 年 4 月,法国两个产科单位。

人群

272 名接受硬膜外镇痛、足月(≥37 周)阴道单胎分娩和会阴正中切开术的女性,在会阴切开修复前以 1:1 的比例随机分为罗哌卡因(n=135)或安慰剂(n=137)局部浸润。

方法

患者在短期(12、24、48 小时)、中期(第 7 天)和长期(3 和 6 个月)进行随访。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标是中期(第 7 天)产后会阴疼痛的发生率,定义为数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)超过 3/10。次要观察指标为会阴疼痛(NPRS)和镇痛药摄入量、生活质量(SF-36)、产后抑郁(EPDS)、疼痛神经病变成分(DN4)和性健康(FSFI)。

结果

罗哌卡因组和安慰剂组在第 7 天的会阴疼痛发生率相同(34.2%与 30.4%,比值比 1.1,95%置信区间 0.7-1.8,p=0.63)。短期和长期的结果相似。两组均有较高的性交痛和产后抑郁发生率。两组在镇痛药摄入量、不良反应、疼痛神经病变成分和产后生活质量方面无差异。

结论

本研究未显示罗哌卡因浸润与安慰剂相比有任何优势。

相似文献

1
Ropivacaine perineal infiltration for postpartum pain management in episiotomy repair: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.罗哌卡因会阴浸润用于会阴切开修复产后疼痛管理:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
BJOG. 2024 Jun;131(7):899-907. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17266. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Ropivacaine 75 mg versus placebo in perineal infiltration for analgesic efficacy at mid- and long-term for episiotomy repair in postpartum women - the ROPISIO study: a two-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.罗哌卡因 75mg 用于会阴浸润与安慰剂在产后会阴切开修复术的中、长期镇痛效果比较:ROPISIO 研究:一项两中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Trials. 2020 Jun 12;21(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04423-x.
3
Perineal infiltration with lidocaine 1%, ropivacaine 0.75%, or placebo for episiotomy repair in parturients who received epidural labor analgesia: a double-blind randomized study.罗哌卡因 0.75%、利多卡因 1%或安慰剂用于接受硬膜外分娩镇痛的产妇会阴切开修复的会阴浸润:一项双盲随机研究。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010 Jul;19(3):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.11.005. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
4
[Postpartum perineal pain: effectiveness of local ropivacaine infiltration].[产后会阴部疼痛:局部罗哌卡因浸润的有效性]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2009 Oct;38(6):510-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
5
Ropivacaine versus lidocaine infiltration for postpartum perineal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.罗哌卡因与利多卡因浸润用于产后会阴痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Oct;50(8):102074. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102074. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
A randomised clinical trial of the effect of low-level laser therapy for perineal pain and healing after episiotomy: a pilot study.随机临床试验低水平激光治疗会阴切开术后疼痛和愈合的效果:一项初步研究。
Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):e653-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
7
A randomized controlled trial of pudendal nerve block for pain relief after episiotomy.一项关于阴部神经阻滞用于会阴切开术后疼痛缓解的随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Aug;107(2):625-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817ee48f.
8
Morbidity experienced by women before and after operative vaginal delivery: prospective cohort study nested within a two-centre randomised controlled trial of restrictive versus routine use of episiotomy.经阴道分娩前后女性的发病率:一项限制与常规会阴切开术使用的二中心随机对照试验中的嵌套前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2013 Jul;120(8):1020-6. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12184. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
Effectiveness of local anaesthetics with and without vasoconstrictors for perineal repair during spontaneous delivery: double-blind randomised controlled trial.局部麻醉药联合或不联合血管收缩剂用于自然分娩会阴修补术的有效性:双盲随机对照试验
Midwifery. 2009 Feb;25(1):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
10
Effect of low-level laser therapy on pain and perineal healing after episiotomy: A triple-blind randomized controlled trial.低强度激光疗法对会阴切开术后疼痛及会阴愈合的影响:一项三盲随机对照试验。
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Feb;49(2):181-188. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22559. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal ropivacaine in pain management following laparoscopic digestive surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.腹腔镜消化道手术后腹腔内罗哌卡因用于疼痛管理的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 19;103(29):e38856. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038856.