• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直径大于 5cm 的胃病变的可行性和安全性。

The feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions larger than 5 cm.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1 Chuo, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan.

Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, 5-9-22 Higashi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-8625, Japan.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2022 Nov;25(6):1031-1038. doi: 10.1007/s10120-022-01323-8. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10120-022-01323-8
PMID:35879522
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer have been revised, diagnostic ESD has increased. However, despite the technical difficulty of ESD for large lesions, the degree to which curative resection can be achieved has not been clarified. This study investigated the feasibility and safety of ESD for gastric lesions larger than 5 cm.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 3474 gastric lesions treated by ESD from April 2012 to December 2021. We compared clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes between lesions ≥ 5 cm and lesions < 5 cm.

RESULTS

There were 128 lesions in the ≥ 5 cm group and 3282 lesions in the < 5 cm group. In the ≥ 5 cm group, upper location and fibrosis during ESD were more common, with a lower rate of 0-IIc type. Both en bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate were comparable, but there was a difference in curative resection rate (65.6% in the ≥ 5 cm group and 91.5% in the < 5 cm group). The frequency of adverse events (post-ESD bleeding, perforation, or stenosis) was almost similar, but delayed perforation was significantly more common (1.6% in the ≥ 5 cm group vs. 0.1% in the < 5 cm group).

CONCLUSIONS

About two-thirds of curative resections were obtained with ESD for early gastric lesions larger than 5 cm, but delayed complications should be noted (Number: UMIN000047725).

摘要

背景

随着内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗早期胃癌适应证的修订,诊断性 ESD 有所增加。然而,尽管 ESD 治疗大病变存在技术难度,但尚未明确能够达到多大程度的治愈性切除。本研究旨在探讨治疗直径大于 5cm 的胃病变行 ESD 的可行性和安全性。

方法

本回顾性多中心研究纳入了 2012 年 4 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受 ESD 治疗的 3474 例胃病变患者。我们比较了病变直径≥5cm 组与病变直径<5cm 组的临床病理特征和治疗结局。

结果

病变直径≥5cm 组中共有 128 例病变,病变直径<5cm 组中共有 3282 例病变。在病变直径≥5cm 组中,病变位于上部和 ESD 时出现纤维化更为常见,0-IIc 型的比例较低。整块切除率和 R0 切除率相当,但治愈性切除率存在差异(病变直径≥5cm 组为 65.6%,病变直径<5cm 组为 91.5%)。不良事件(ESD 后出血、穿孔或狭窄)的发生频率几乎相似,但延迟性穿孔更为常见(病变直径≥5cm 组为 1.6%,病变直径<5cm 组为 0.1%)。

结论

对于直径大于 5cm 的早期胃癌病变,通过 ESD 获得约三分之二的治愈性切除,但应注意迟发性并发症(注册号:UMIN000047725)。

相似文献

1
The feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions larger than 5 cm.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直径大于 5cm 的胃病变的可行性和安全性。
Gastric Cancer. 2022 Nov;25(6):1031-1038. doi: 10.1007/s10120-022-01323-8. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
2
Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study.1000例早期胃肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的治疗结果:韩国ESD研究组多中心研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun;69(7):1228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.027. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
3
Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer: Results from a prospective national registry.在胃癌发病率较低的国家实施内镜黏膜下剥离术:来自前瞻性全国登记研究的结果。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Jul;9(6):718-726. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12101. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions larger than 10 cm.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直径大于 10cm 的结直肠病变的可行性。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5348-5355. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08916-x. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
5
Risk factors associated with difficult gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: predicting difficult ESD.与困难的胃内镜黏膜下剥离术相关的危险因素:预测困难的内镜黏膜下剥离术
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1617-1626. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5149-6. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
6
Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an effective and safe therapy for early gastric neoplasms: a multicenter feasible study.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌安全有效:多中心可行性研究。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb;46(2):124-9. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31822f3988.
7
Clinico-pathologic determinants of non-e-curative outcome following en-bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasia.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌非整块切除的临床病理因素分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07762-9.
8
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric tube cancer after esophagectomy.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管癌术后胃管癌。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Feb;79(2):260-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.059. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
9
AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States.AGA 研究所临床实践更新:美国内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):16-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
10
Therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection of differentiated early gastric cancer in a Western endoscopy setting (with video).西方内镜检查环境下分化型早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术的治疗结果(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Nov;82(5):804-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1960. Epub 2015 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for pyloric neoplasms.内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗幽门肿瘤的疗效与安全性
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12061-0.
2
Diagnostic performance of deep-learning-based virtual chromoendoscopy in gastric neoplasms.基于深度学习的虚拟 chromoendoscopy 在胃肿瘤中的诊断性能。
Gastric Cancer. 2024 May;27(3):539-547. doi: 10.1007/s10120-024-01469-7. Epub 2024 Jan 19.