Suppr超能文献

一项真实世界研究,比较非抑制剂型A型血友病患者从FVIII预防治疗转换为emicizumab治疗前后的年度计费出血率和总护理成本。

A real-world study comparing pre-post billed annualized bleed rates and total cost of care among non-inhibitor patients with hemophilia A switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab.

作者信息

Batt Katharine, Schultz Bob G, Caicedo Jorge, Hollenbeak Christopher S, Agrawal Neha, Chatterjee Sagnik, Bullano Michael

机构信息

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Outcomes Research, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Oct;38(10):1685-1693. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2105072. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement and emicizumab have demonstrated efficacy for prevention of bleeds among patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) compared to on-demand (OD) use. Evidence investigating clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of non-inhibitor PwHA switching from prophylaxis with FVIII concentrates to emicizumab has not been well-established within large real-world datasets. This study aimed to investigate billed annualized bleed rates (ABR) and total cost of care (TCC) among non-inhibitor PwHA switching from FVIII-prophylaxis to emicizumab-prophylaxis.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study was conducted using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus, a US administrative claims database. The date of first claim for emicizumab was defined as the index date. OD patients and inhibitor patients were excluded. Bleeds were identified using a list of 535 diagnosis codes. Bayesian models were developed to estimate the probability ABR worsens and TCC increases after switching to emicizumab. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to test statistical significance of changes in ABR and TCC after switch.

RESULTS

Among the 121 identified patients, the difference in mean ABR between FVIII-prophylaxis (0.68 [SD = 1.28]) and emicizumab (0.55 [SD = 1.48]) was insignificant ( = .142). The mean annual TCC significantly increased for patients switching from FVIII-prophylaxis ($518,151 [SD = $289,934]) to emicizumab ($652,679 [SD = $340,126];  < .0001). The Bayesian models estimated a 21.0% probability of the ABR worsening and a 99.9% probability of increasing TCC after switch.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that in male non-inhibitor PwHA, switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab incurs substantial cost increase with no significant benefit in ABR. This evidence may help guide providers, payers, and patients in shared decision-making conversations around best treatment options.

摘要

目的

与按需使用相比,因子VIII(FVIII)替代疗法和艾美赛珠单抗已证明对预防甲型血友病患者(PwHA)出血有效。在大型真实世界数据集中,尚未充分确立关于非抑制性PwHA从FVIII浓缩物预防转换为艾美赛珠单抗预防的临床结局和医疗成本的证据。本研究旨在调查从FVIII预防转换为艾美赛珠单抗预防的非抑制性PwHA的年度计费出血率(ABR)和总护理成本(TCC)。

方法

本回顾性观察性研究使用美国管理索赔数据库IQVIA PharMetrics Plus进行。艾美赛珠单抗首次索赔日期定义为索引日期。排除按需治疗患者和抑制物患者。使用535个诊断代码列表识别出血情况。开发贝叶斯模型以估计转换为艾美赛珠单抗后ABR恶化和TCC增加的概率。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验来检验转换后ABR和TCC变化的统计学显著性。

结果

在121名确定的患者中,FVIII预防组(0.68 [标准差 = 1.28])和艾美赛珠单抗组(0.55 [标准差 = 1.48])的平均ABR差异不显著(P = 0. .142)。从FVIII预防组(518,151美元[标准差 = 289,934美元])转换为艾美赛珠单抗组(652,679美元[标准差 = 340,126美元])的患者平均年度TCC显著增加(P < 0.0001)。贝叶斯模型估计转换后ABR恶化的概率为(21.0%),TCC增加的概率为(99.9%)。

结论

本研究发现,在男性非抑制性PwHA中,从FVIII预防转换为艾美赛珠单抗会导致成本大幅增加,而ABR无显著益处。这一证据可能有助于指导医疗服务提供者、支付方和患者围绕最佳治疗方案进行共同决策对话。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验