• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“大岛模式”:一种针对农村无家可归问题的新型永久性支持性住房模式的居民体验。

'The Big Island Model': Resident experiences of a novel permanent supportive housing model for responding to rural homelessness.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Elborn College, Occupational Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Modern Occupational Therapy, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5047-e5061. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13920. Epub 2022 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.13920
PMID:35880677
Abstract

Research on rural homelessness focuses primarily on describing the experiences and prevalence of homelessness in rural contexts, with little focus on intervention strategies. We conducted a case study of the 'Big Island Model' (BIM), a novel approach to providing housing and support to individuals experiencing homelessness that has been developed for, and reflects, a rural context. We interviewed 13 participants (n = 10 men; n = 3 women) supported by the BIM using mixed interviews including qualitative and quantitative components exploring experiences of living within this model and aspects of psychosocial well-being. Descriptive statistics were calculated to represent demographic data and participants' scores on standardised measures. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted with threshold scores and population norms derived from existing literature to identify any differences between residents' median scores on each standardised scale and scores derived from published literature. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. On measures of meaningful activity, residents reported significantly lower levels of boredom (p < 0.01) and a greater degree of engagement in productivity (p < 0.01) compared with participants in other studies. Mental well-being was reported to be higher (p < 0.05) and drug use was significantly lower than a low-moderate range (p < 0.01). Community integration scores revealed significantly lower physical integration (p < 0.05) and significantly higher psychological integration than individuals who had transitioned to housing in another study (p < 0.001). Our analysis of qualitative interviews resulted in the identification of a central essence characterising residents' experiences: 'Becoming Through Belonging'. This essence was represented by four distinct themes: (1) the healing qualities of nature; (2) being meaningfully occupied; (3) living in a mutually supportive environment; and (4) this place is here to help.

摘要

农村无家可归问题的研究主要集中在描述农村背景下无家可归者的经历和普遍性,而很少关注干预策略。我们对“大岛模式”(BIM)进行了案例研究,这是一种为农村背景下的无家可归者提供住房和支持的新方法,反映并适应了农村背景。我们使用混合访谈的方式采访了 13 名接受 BIM 支持的参与者(n=10 名男性;n=3 名女性),其中包括定性和定量部分,探索了他们在这种模式下的生活经历和心理社会福祉的各个方面。我们计算了描述性统计数据来表示人口统计数据和参与者在标准测量上的得分。我们进行了 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验,并使用来自现有文献的阈值分数和人群常模,来确定居民在每个标准量表上的中位数分数与来自已发表文献的分数之间的任何差异。我们使用主题分析对定性数据进行了分析。在有意义的活动方面的衡量标准上,与其他研究的参与者相比,居民报告的无聊程度明显较低(p<0.01),参与生产性活动的程度更高(p<0.01)。报告的心理健康水平更高(p<0.05),药物使用显著低于低中度范围(p<0.01)。社区融入评分显示,身体融入程度明显较低(p<0.05),心理融入程度明显高于另一项研究中过渡到住房的个体(p<0.001)。我们对定性访谈的分析得出了一个中心本质,它描述了居民的体验:“通过归属而成长”。这一本质由四个不同的主题体现:(1)自然的治愈品质;(2)有意义的职业;(3)生活在相互支持的环境中;(4)这个地方是来帮忙的。

相似文献

1
'The Big Island Model': Resident experiences of a novel permanent supportive housing model for responding to rural homelessness.“大岛模式”:一种针对农村无家可归问题的新型永久性支持性住房模式的居民体验。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5047-e5061. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13920. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
2
Rural homelessness: how the structural and social context of small-town living influences the experience of homelessness.农村地区无家可归问题:小城镇生活的结构和社会环境如何影响无家可归者的体验。
Can J Public Health. 2022 Jun;113(3):407-416. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00625-9. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
3
"It's like your days are empty and yet there's life all around": A mixed methods, multi-site study exploring boredom during and following homelessness.“日子好像空虚了,但周围却充满了生机”:一项混合方法、多地点研究,探索无家可归期间和之后的无聊感。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0302900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302900. eCollection 2024.
4
"I can't remember the last time I was comfortable about being home": lived experience perspectives on thriving following homelessness.“我不记得上次我在家感到舒适是什么时候了”:无家可归后茁壮成长的生活体验观点。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2176979. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2176979.
5
Effectiveness of interventions targeting community integration among individuals with lived experiences of homelessness: A systematic review.针对有 homeless 经历的个体的社区融入干预措施的效果:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):1843-1862. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13030. Epub 2020 May 26.
6
Exploring the Association of Community Integration in Mental Health among Formerly Homeless Individuals Living in Permanent Supportive Housing.探讨居住在永久性支持性住房中的曾经无家可归者的精神健康社区融合情况。
Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Sep;66(1-2):3-13. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12459. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
7
Competing perspectives on rural homelessness: Findings from a qualitative study in Ontario, Canada.关于农村无家可归问题的不同观点:加拿大安大略省一项定性研究的结果
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e2003-e2011. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13633. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
8
Meaningful Activity and Boredom in the Transition from Homelessness: Two Narratives.从无家可归到过渡阶段的有意义活动和无聊:两个叙述。
Can J Occup Ther. 2020 Oct;87(4):253-264. doi: 10.1177/0008417420941782. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
9
Effectiveness of employment-based interventions for persons experiencing homelessness: A systematic review.基于就业的干预措施对 homeless 人群的有效性:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):2142-2169. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13892. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
10
Self-management of health care: multimethod study of using integrated health care and supportive housing to address systematic barriers for people experiencing homelessness.医疗保健的自我管理:关于利用综合医疗保健和支持性住房来消除无家可归者面临的系统性障碍的多方法研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Jun;42(3):303-308. doi: 10.1071/AH16277.

引用本文的文献

1
What is well-being? A scoping review of the conceptual and operational definitions of occupational well-being.什么是幸福?对职业幸福的概念和操作定义的范围综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 16;7(1):e227. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.648. eCollection 2023.