Social Justice in Mental Health Research Lab, School of Occupational Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0302900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302900. eCollection 2024.
To identify experiences of boredom and associations with psychosocial well-being during and following homelessness.
Using a convergent, mixed-methods explanatory design, we conducted quantitative interviews with 164 participants) (n = 102 unhoused; n = 62 housed following homelessness) using a 92-item protocol involving demographic components and seven standardized measures of psychosocial well-being. A sub-sample (n = 32) was approached to participate in qualitative interviews. Data were analyzed by group (unhoused; housed). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics designed to generate insights into boredom, meaningful activity engagement, and their associations with psychosocial well-being during and following homelessness. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated at the stage of discussion.
Quantitative analyses revealed small to moderate correlations between boredom and increased hopelessness (rs = .376, p < .01), increased drug use (rs = .194, p < .05), and lowered mental well-being (rs = -.366, p < .01). There were no statistically significant differences between unhoused and housed participants on any standardized measures. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that housing status was not a significant predictor of boredom or meaningful activity engagement (p>.05). Qualitative interviews revealed profound boredom during and following homelessness imposing negative influences on mental well-being and driving substance use.
Boredom and meaningful activity are important outcomes that require focused attention in services designed to support individuals during and following homelessness. Attention to this construct in future research, practice, and policy has the potential to support the well-being of individuals who experience homelessness, and to contribute to efforts aimed at homelessness prevention.
确定无家可归期间和之后的无聊体验及其与心理社会健康的关联。
采用收敛性混合方法解释性设计,我们对 164 名参与者(102 名无家可归者,62 名无家可归后有房者)进行了定量访谈,使用了涉及人口统计学成分和七种标准化心理社会健康衡量标准的 92 项方案。对 32 名(n=32)参与者进行了定性访谈。通过组(无家可归者;有房者)进行数据分析。定量数据采用描述性统计分析,旨在深入了解无聊感、有意义的活动参与及其与无家可归期间和之后的心理社会健康的关联。定性数据采用主题分析进行分析。在讨论阶段整合定量和定性发现。
定量分析显示,无聊感与绝望感增加(rs=0.376,p<0.01)、药物使用增加(rs=0.194,p<0.05)和心理健康水平降低(rs=0.366,p<0.01)之间存在小到中度相关性。在任何标准化衡量标准上,无家可归者和有房者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。层次回归分析表明,住房状况不是无聊感或有意义的活动参与的重要预测因素(p>.05)。定性访谈揭示了无家可归期间和之后的深刻无聊感对心理健康产生负面影响,并促使药物使用。
无聊感和有意义的活动是重要的结果,需要在为无家可归者提供服务时给予关注。在未来的研究、实践和政策中关注这一结构,有可能支持无家可归者的幸福感,并为预防无家可归的努力做出贡献。