Suppr超能文献

对比剂暴露患者的肾脏安全性和肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂:一项多中心随机对照研究。

Renal Safety and Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Patients With Contrast Media Exposure: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study.

机构信息

The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.

Department of Cardiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; the First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University, of Science and Technology), Cardiovascular Minimally Invasive Medical Engineering Technology Research and Development Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China ; and.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 1;80(5):718-724. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001325.

Abstract

There is no clear consensus on the safety of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with contrast media exposure. We aimed to assess the safety of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients exposed to contrast media at 1-year follow-up. Patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) were recruited and randomly divided into 2 groups (1:1 ratio): with ACEI/ARB group (ACEI/ARB continued throughout the study period) and without ACEI/ARB group (ACEI/ARB stopped 24 hours before and continued 48 hours after the procedure). The primary endpoint was contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) and secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and the need for renal replacement therapy during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up. The occurrence rates of CI-AKI were not comparable in the ACEI/ARB group and the without ACEI/ARB group (2.92% and 2.62%, respectively; P = 0.866). No significant between-group differences were found with respect to the frequency of MACEs or renal replacement therapy during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up. On subgroup analysis, among patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min, the incidence of CI-AKI was significantly higher in the ACEI/ARB group [17.95% (14/78) vs. 6.02% (5/83), P = 0.029]. Among patients with eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min, the incidence of CI-AKI was comparable in the 2 groups [0.87% (5/572) vs. 2.12% (12/567), P = 0.094]. The incidence of MACEs and renal replacement therapy was not comparable in the 2 groups, during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up. ACEI or ARB treatment can safely be continued after exposure to contrast media, but not in patients with eGFR < 45 mL/min.

摘要

在接受造影剂暴露的患者中,肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂的安全性尚无明确共识。我们旨在评估在 1 年随访期间接受造影剂的患者使用肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂的安全性。招募并随机将接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ACEI/ARB)治疗的患者分为 2 组(1:1 比例):ACEI/ARB 组(ACEI/ARB 在整个研究期间持续使用)和无 ACEI/ARB 组(ACEI/ARB 在检查前 24 小时停止并在检查后 48 小时继续使用)。主要终点是造影剂引起的急性肾损伤(CI-AKI),次要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACEs),以及住院期间和 1 年随访期间需要肾脏替代治疗的情况。ACEI/ARB 组和无 ACEI/ARB 组的 CI-AKI 发生率无差异(分别为 2.92%和 2.62%;P=0.866)。住院期间和 1 年随访期间,MACEs 或肾脏替代治疗的频率在组间无显著差异。在亚组分析中,在估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<45 mL/min 的患者中,ACEI/ARB 组的 CI-AKI 发生率明显更高[17.95%(14/78)比 6.02%(5/83),P=0.029]。在 eGFR≥45 mL/min 的患者中,2 组的 CI-AKI 发生率无差异[0.87%(5/572)比 2.12%(12/567),P=0.094]。在住院期间和 1 年随访期间,2 组的 MACEs 和肾脏替代治疗发生率无差异。在接受造影剂暴露后,ACEI 或 ARB 治疗可以安全继续,但在 eGFR<45 mL/min 的患者中不可以。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37f7/9640273/ebe658a34e3c/jcvp-80-718-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验