The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
Department of Cardiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; the First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University, of Science and Technology), Cardiovascular Minimally Invasive Medical Engineering Technology Research and Development Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China ; and.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 1;80(5):718-724. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001325.
There is no clear consensus on the safety of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with contrast media exposure. We aimed to assess the safety of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients exposed to contrast media at 1-year follow-up. Patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) were recruited and randomly divided into 2 groups (1:1 ratio): with ACEI/ARB group (ACEI/ARB continued throughout the study period) and without ACEI/ARB group (ACEI/ARB stopped 24 hours before and continued 48 hours after the procedure). The primary endpoint was contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) and secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and the need for renal replacement therapy during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up. The occurrence rates of CI-AKI were not comparable in the ACEI/ARB group and the without ACEI/ARB group (2.92% and 2.62%, respectively; P = 0.866). No significant between-group differences were found with respect to the frequency of MACEs or renal replacement therapy during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up. On subgroup analysis, among patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min, the incidence of CI-AKI was significantly higher in the ACEI/ARB group [17.95% (14/78) vs. 6.02% (5/83), P = 0.029]. Among patients with eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min, the incidence of CI-AKI was comparable in the 2 groups [0.87% (5/572) vs. 2.12% (12/567), P = 0.094]. The incidence of MACEs and renal replacement therapy was not comparable in the 2 groups, during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up. ACEI or ARB treatment can safely be continued after exposure to contrast media, but not in patients with eGFR < 45 mL/min.
在接受造影剂暴露的患者中,肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂的安全性尚无明确共识。我们旨在评估在 1 年随访期间接受造影剂的患者使用肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂的安全性。招募并随机将接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ACEI/ARB)治疗的患者分为 2 组(1:1 比例):ACEI/ARB 组(ACEI/ARB 在整个研究期间持续使用)和无 ACEI/ARB 组(ACEI/ARB 在检查前 24 小时停止并在检查后 48 小时继续使用)。主要终点是造影剂引起的急性肾损伤(CI-AKI),次要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACEs),以及住院期间和 1 年随访期间需要肾脏替代治疗的情况。ACEI/ARB 组和无 ACEI/ARB 组的 CI-AKI 发生率无差异(分别为 2.92%和 2.62%;P=0.866)。住院期间和 1 年随访期间,MACEs 或肾脏替代治疗的频率在组间无显著差异。在亚组分析中,在估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<45 mL/min 的患者中,ACEI/ARB 组的 CI-AKI 发生率明显更高[17.95%(14/78)比 6.02%(5/83),P=0.029]。在 eGFR≥45 mL/min 的患者中,2 组的 CI-AKI 发生率无差异[0.87%(5/572)比 2.12%(12/567),P=0.094]。在住院期间和 1 年随访期间,2 组的 MACEs 和肾脏替代治疗发生率无差异。在接受造影剂暴露后,ACEI 或 ARB 治疗可以安全继续,但在 eGFR<45 mL/min 的患者中不可以。