Suppr超能文献

带倒刺缝线的疝缺损闭合:腹膜外机器人腹侧疝修补术患者报告结局评估。

Hernia Defect Closure With Barbed Suture: An Assessment of Patient-reported Outcomes in Extraperitoneal Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx.

Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Aug 1;32(4):494-500. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001073.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary closure of a fascial defect during ventral hernia repair is associated with lower rates of recurrence and better patient satisfaction compared with bridging repairs. Robotic surgery offers enhanced ability to close these defects and this has likely been aided by the use of barbed suture. The goal of this study was to evaluate the perioperative safety and the long-term outcomes for the use of barbed suture for the primary closure of hernia defects during robotic ventral hernia repair (rVHR) with mesh.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent rVHR with the use of a barbed suture for fascial defect closure from August 2018 to August 2020 in an academic center. All the patients included were queried by phone to complete a quality of life assessment to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Subjective sense of a bulge and pain at the previous hernia site has been shown to correlate with hernia recurrence. These questions were used in conjunction with a Hernia-related Quality of Life Survey (HerQles) score to assess a patient's quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients with 102 hernias were analyzed. Sixty patients (74%) were successfully reached and completed the PRO form at median postoperative day 356 (range: 43 to 818). Eight patients (13% of patients with PRO data) claimed to have both a bulge and pain at their previous hernia site, concerning for possible recurrence. Median overall HerQLes score was 82 [Interquartile Range (IQR): 54 to 99]. Patients with a single hernia defect, when compared with those with multiple defects, had a lower rate of both a bulge (15% vs. 30%) and symptoms (33% vs. 48%), as well as a higher median HerQLes score (85 vs. 62) at the time of PRO follow-up. Patients with previous hernia repair had a lower median HerQLes score of 65 (IQR: 43 to 90) versus 88 (IQR: 62-100). These patients also had a higher rate of sensing a bulge (29% vs. 18%), whereas a sense of symptoms at the site was less (33% vs. 44%).

CONCLUSIONS

Barbed suture for fascial defect closure in rVHR was found to be safe with an acceptable rate of possible recurrence by the use of PRO data. Patients with multiple hernias and previous repairs had a higher likelihood of recurrence and a lower quality of life after rVHR.

摘要

背景

与桥接修复相比,在腹疝修复过程中进行筋膜缺损的一期闭合与较低的复发率和更好的患者满意度相关。机器人手术提供了更好的闭合这些缺陷的能力,而这可能得益于使用带倒刺缝线。本研究的目的是评估在使用带倒刺缝线修复机器人腹疝修复(rVHR)中使用网片进行筋膜缺损一期闭合的围手术期安全性和长期结果。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入 2018 年 8 月至 2020 年 8 月在一家学术中心接受 rVHR 且使用带倒刺缝线进行筋膜缺损闭合的成年患者。所有纳入的患者均通过电话询问以完成生活质量评估,以评估患者报告的结果(PROs)。先前疝部位的膨出感和疼痛与疝复发相关。这些问题与疝相关生活质量调查(HerQles)评分一起用于评估患者的生活质量。

结果

共分析了 81 例 102 例疝患者。60 例患者(74%)成功接受并在术后第 356 天中位数(范围:43 至 818)完成 PRO 表格。8 例患者(有 PRO 数据的患者中有 13%)声称在先前的疝部位既有膨出感又有疼痛,可能有复发的担忧。总体 HerQles 评分中位数为 82[四分位距(IQR):54 至 99]。与多个缺陷相比,单个疝缺陷的患者膨出感(15%比 30%)和症状(33%比 48%)发生率较低,PRO 随访时的中位 HerQles 评分也较高(85 比 62)。有先前疝修复史的患者 HerQles 评分中位数为 65(IQR:43 至 90),而无先前疝修复史的患者为 88(IQR:62 至 100)。这些患者膨出感的发生率也较高(29%比 18%),而该部位的症状发生率较低(33%比 44%)。

结论

使用 PRO 数据,发现 rVHR 中使用带倒刺缝线进行筋膜缺损闭合是安全的,复发率可接受。有多个疝和先前修复的患者 rVHR 后复发的可能性更高,生活质量更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验