Siegwart Valerie, Schürch Kirstin, Benzing Valentin, Roessler Jochen, Everts Regula
Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Division of Neuropediatrics, Development, and Rehabilitation, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Children (Basel). 2022 Jun 22;9(7):936. doi: 10.3390/children9070936.
Personal and social resources may buffer the adverse effects of childhood cancer and its impact on cognition and quality of life. While childhood cancer survivors show domain-specific cognitive difficulties, little is known about their personal and social resources. We therefore investigated personal and social resources and their association with cognitive and quality-of-life outcomes in childhood cancer survivors. Seventy-eight survivors of childhood cancer of different etiologies (aged 7−16 years; ≥one year since treatment) and fifty-six healthy controls were included. Cognitive outcome was assessed by neuropsychological tests; personal and social resources, as well as health-related quality of life, were assessed by standardized questionnaires. In the social resource domain, peer integration was worse in survivors than in controls (puncorr < 0.04, d = 0.33). Personal resources and all other subscales of social resources did not significantly differ between survivors and controls. In survivors, the global resource score was significantly correlated with processing speed (r = 0.39, pcorr < 0.001) and quality of life (parent: r = 0.44; self-report: r = 0.46; pscorr < 0.001). In controls, no association occurred between resources and cognitive outcome, and the correlation between the global resource score and quality of life did not withstand correction for multiple comparison (parent: r = 0.28; self-report: r = 0.40, psuncorr < 0.001). After an adverse event such as childhood cancer, resources might play a particularly buffering role on cognitive performance and quality of life (when compared to the everyday life of healthy controls). This highlights the importance of interventions that strengthen the resources of children and their families, even years after cancer. Such resource-focused intervention could help to counteract long-term sequelae in cognitive outcomes and health-related quality of life.
个人和社会资源可能会缓冲儿童癌症的不良影响及其对认知和生活质量的影响。虽然儿童癌症幸存者存在特定领域的认知困难,但对于他们的个人和社会资源却知之甚少。因此,我们调查了儿童癌症幸存者的个人和社会资源及其与认知和生活质量结果的关联。研究纳入了78名不同病因的儿童癌症幸存者(年龄7 - 16岁;治疗后至少一年)和56名健康对照。通过神经心理学测试评估认知结果;通过标准化问卷评估个人和社会资源以及与健康相关的生活质量。在社会资源领域,幸存者的同伴融入情况比对照组差(校正后P<0.04,d = 0.33)。幸存者和对照组在个人资源以及社会资源的所有其他子量表方面没有显著差异。在幸存者中,总体资源得分与处理速度显著相关(r = 0.39,校正后P<0.001)和生活质量(家长报告:r = 0.44;自我报告:r = 0.46;校正后P<0.001)。在对照组中,资源与认知结果之间没有关联,总体资源得分与生活质量之间的相关性在多重比较校正后不显著(家长报告:r = 0.28;自我报告:r = 0.40,未校正P<0.001)。在经历儿童癌症这样的不良事件后,资源可能对认知表现和生活质量起到特别的缓冲作用(与健康对照的日常生活相比)。这凸显了加强儿童及其家庭资源的干预措施的重要性,即使在患癌多年后也是如此。这种以资源为重点的干预措施有助于抵消认知结果和与健康相关生活质量方面的长期后遗症。