Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗后保乳手术中的情况

"" in Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

作者信息

Atzori Giulia, Gipponi Marco, Cornacchia Chiara, Diaz Raquel, Sparavigna Marco, Gallo Maurizio, Ruelle Tommaso, Murelli Federica, Franchelli Simonetta, Depaoli Francesca, Friedman Daniele, Fregatti Piero

机构信息

Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy.

Department Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 23;12(7):1031. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071031.

Abstract

Background/Aim: Patients with Stage I-II breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (BCS-NAC) were retrospectively assessed in order to evaluate the extent of a safe excision margin. Materials and Methods: Between 2003 and 2020, 151 patients underwent risk-adapted BCS-NAC; margin involvement was always assessed at definitive histology. Patients with complete pathological response (pCR) were classified as the RX group, whereas those with residual disease and negative margins were stratified as R0 < 1 mm (margin < 1 mm) and R0 > 1 mm (margin > 1 mm). Results: Totals of 29 (19.2%), 64 (42.4%), and 58 patients (38.4%) were included in the R0 < 1 mm, R0 > 1 mm, and RX groups, respectively, and 2 patients with margin involvement had a mastectomy. Ten instances of local recurrence (6.6%) occurred, with no statistically significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between the three groups. A statistically significant advantage of disease-free survival (p = 0.002) and overall survival (p = 0.010) was observed in patients with pCR. Conclusions: BCS-NAC was increased, especially in HER-2-positive and triple-negative tumors; risk-adapted BCS should be preferably pursued to highlight the cosmetic benefit of NAC. The similar rate of LRFS in the three groups of patients suggests a shift toward the “no ink on tumor” paradigm for patients undergoing BCS-NAC.

摘要

背景/目的:对接受新辅助化疗后保乳手术(BCS-NAC)的Ⅰ-Ⅱ期乳腺癌患者进行回顾性评估,以评估安全切缘范围。材料与方法:2003年至2020年期间,151例患者接受了风险适应性BCS-NAC;切缘受累情况始终在最终组织学检查时进行评估。病理完全缓解(pCR)的患者被分类为RX组,而有残留疾病且切缘阴性的患者被分层为R0<1mm(切缘<1mm)和R0>1mm(切缘>1mm)。结果:R0<1mm、R0>1mm和RX组分别纳入29例(19.2%)、64例(42.4%)和58例患者(38.4%),2例切缘受累患者接受了乳房切除术。发生了10例局部复发(6.6%),三组之间的无局部复发生存期(LRFS)无统计学显著差异。在pCR患者中观察到无病生存期(p=0.002)和总生存期(p=0.010)具有统计学显著优势。结论:BCS-NAC有所增加,尤其是在HER-2阳性和三阴性肿瘤中;应优先采用风险适应性BCS,以突出NAC的美容益处。三组患者相似的LRFS率表明,对于接受BCS-NAC的患者,正在向“肿瘤无墨染”模式转变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a539/9320436/1714f3699dee/jpm-12-01031-g001a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验