Suhartanto Bambang, Rahayu Eka Rizky Vury, Umami Nafiatul, Astuti Dian
Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Agrotecnology Innovation Agriculture Center, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2022 May 27;9(2):175-183. doi: 10.5455/javar.2022.i582. eCollection 2022 Jun.
The goal of this research was to figure out the effect of the local sorghum as silage on the performance of Bligon goats. Microbial protein synthesis, digestible nutrients, and average daily weight gain (ADWG) were measured to evaluate the goats' performance.
The study was designed in a completely randomized design with a one-way pattern. Twelve female Bligon goats with 24.33 ± 2.83 kg (mean ± SEM) initial body weight were divided into three groups of total mixed ration (TMR) treatments. Group 1 received fresh Napier grass (FNG) as a control, group 2 received imported sorghum silage (ISS) of brown midrib resistance (BMR), and group 3 received local sorghum silage (LSS) of super-2. Analysis of variance was used to analyze the data on microbial protein synthesis and feed intake during the research. On the contrary, analysis of covariance was used to analyze ADWG with initial weight as a covariate.
Microbial protein synthesis, feed-intake, and ADWG of goats that received TMR based on silage of two varieties of sorghum, namely BMR (ISS) and super-2 (LSS), were lower ( < 0.05) than control. However, there was no significant difference between both TMR based on sorghum silages. ISS's feed conversion was better than LSS ( < 0.05), and FNG was the best. Sorghum silage as a basal ration in TMR had lower microbial protein synthesis but higher total digestible nutrient content than fresh forage, such as Napier grass. The sorghum varieties did not affect the microbial protein synthesis, digestible nutrients, and ADWG of Bligon goats. However, ISS treatment had higher feed efficiency than LSS.
The local sorghum (super-2) silage can be used as ruminant feed as well as imported sorghum (BMR) offered as TMR. However, regardless of the cultivar, TMR based on sorghum silage cannot replace TMR based on fresh Napier grass.
本研究的目的是确定当地高粱青贮饲料对布利贡山羊生产性能的影响。通过测量微生物蛋白质合成、可消化养分和平均日增重(ADWG)来评估山羊的生产性能。
本研究采用完全随机设计,采用单向模式。将12只初始体重为24.33±2.83 kg(平均值±标准误)的雌性布利贡山羊分为三组,进行全混合日粮(TMR)处理。第1组以新鲜象草(FNG)作为对照,第2组接受抗褐中脉(BMR)的进口高粱青贮饲料(ISS),第3组接受超级2号当地高粱青贮饲料(LSS)。在研究过程中,采用方差分析来分析微生物蛋白质合成和采食量的数据。相反,采用协方差分析以初始体重作为协变量来分析ADWG。
以两种高粱青贮饲料,即BMR(ISS)和超级2号(LSS)为基础的TMR喂养的山羊的微生物蛋白质合成、采食量和ADWG均低于对照组(<0.05)。然而,基于高粱青贮饲料的两种TMR之间没有显著差异。ISS的饲料转化率优于LSS(<0.05),FNG的饲料转化率最佳。作为TMR基础日粮的高粱青贮饲料,其微生物蛋白质合成较低,但总可消化养分含量高于新鲜牧草,如象草。高粱品种对布利贡山羊的微生物蛋白质合成、可消化养分和ADWG没有影响。然而,ISS处理的饲料效率高于LSS。
当地高粱(超级2号)青贮饲料可作为反刍动物饲料,与作为TMR提供的进口高粱(BMR)一样。然而,无论品种如何,基于高粱青贮饲料的TMR都不能替代基于新鲜象草的TMR。