• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创外科手术在晚期卵巢癌治疗中起作用吗?

Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?

作者信息

Pereira Augusto, Magrina Javier F, Magtibay Paul M, Neto Joao Siufi, Siufi Daniela F S, Chang Yu-Hui H, Perez-Medina Tirso

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, 28222 Madrid, Spain.

Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;14(15):3579. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153579.

DOI:10.3390/cancers14153579
PMID:35892837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9331315/
Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy allows a minimally invasive approach for interval debulking in patients with ovarian cancer considered unresectable to no residual disease by laparotomy at diagnosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the type of surgical approach at interval debulking (ID) after three courses of carboplatin and taxol in patients with unresectable ovarian cancer at diagnosis compared with the type of surgical approach at primary debulking (PD). A secondary objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes of MIS vs. laparotomy at ID. A retrospective review of the type of surgical approach at ID following three courses of carboplatin and taxol was compared with the surgical approach at PD, and a review of the perioperative outcomes of MIS vs. open at ID was performed during the period from 21 January 2012, through 21 February 2013, for stage IIIC > 2 cm or IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) unresectable at diagnosis and the surgical approach at PD. During the study period, 127 patients with stage IIIC or IV EOC met the inclusion criteria. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), laparoscopic or robotic, was used in 21.6% of patients at ID and in 23.3% of patients at PD. At ID, MIS patients had a shorter hospital stay as compared to laparotomy (2 vs. 8 days; p < 0.001). At 5 year follow-up, 31.5% of EOC patients were alive (ID MIS: 47.5% vs. ID open: 30%; PD MIS: 41% vs. PD open: 28%), while 24.4% had no evidence of disease (ID MIS: 39% vs. ID open: 19.5%; PD MIS: 32% vs. PD open: 22%). Among living patients, 22% had evidence of disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a form of chemo-debulking and allows a minimally invasive approach at interval debulking in about one-fifth of the patients, with initial disease deemed unresectable to no residual tumor at initial diagnosis.

摘要

新辅助化疗为那些在诊断时被认为无法切除、经剖腹手术无法达到无残留疾病的卵巢癌患者提供了一种微创的间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术方法。本研究的目的是评估在诊断时无法切除的卵巢癌患者接受三个疗程的卡铂和紫杉醇治疗后进行间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术(ID)时的手术方式类型,并与初次肿瘤细胞减灭术(PD)时的手术方式类型进行比较。次要目标是比较ID时微创外科手术(MIS)与剖腹手术的围手术期结局。对127例符合纳入标准的IIIC期>2 cm或IV期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者在2012年1月21日至2013年2月21日期间接受三个疗程的卡铂和紫杉醇治疗后ID时的手术方式类型与PD时的手术方式进行回顾性比较,并对ID时MIS与开腹手术的围手术期结局进行回顾。在研究期间,127例IIIC期或IV期EOC患者符合纳入标准。ID时21.6%的患者以及PD时23.3%的患者采用了微创外科手术(MIS),即腹腔镜手术或机器人手术。ID时,MIS患者的住院时间比剖腹手术患者短(2天对8天;p<0.001)。在5年随访时,31.5%的EOC患者存活(ID时MIS组:47.5%对ID时开腹组:30%;PD时MIS组:41%对PD时开腹组:28%),而24.4%的患者无疾病证据(ID时MIS组:39%对ID时开腹组:19.5%;PD时MIS组:32%对PD时开腹组:22%)。在存活患者中,22%有疾病证据。新辅助化疗是一种化疗减瘤形式,约五分之一的患者在间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术时可采用微创方法,初始疾病在初次诊断时被认为无法切除直至无残留肿瘤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ce/9331315/c004fdebbc21/cancers-14-03579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ce/9331315/c004fdebbc21/cancers-14-03579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05ce/9331315/c004fdebbc21/cancers-14-03579-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?微创外科手术在晚期卵巢癌治疗中起作用吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;14(15):3579. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153579.
2
Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后晚期卵巢癌的微创间隔减瘤术。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 May;172:130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.017. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
3
Assessing feasibility and perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive surgery compared with laparotomy for interval debulking surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.评估微创与剖腹手术相比在晚期上皮性卵巢癌间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗中的可行性和围手术期结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.052. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
4
When Less Is More: Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared with Laparotomy for Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.当少即是多时:新辅助化疗后晚期卵巢癌间隔减瘤术的微创与剖腹手术比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):902-909. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.765. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Laparotomy for Interval Debulking Surgery of Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis.新辅助化疗后晚期卵巢癌间隔减瘤手术的微创手术与开腹手术的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 18;12:900256. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.900256. eCollection 2022.
6
Laparoscopic cytoreduction After Neoadjuvant ChEmotherapy (LANCE).新辅助化疗后腹腔镜肿瘤细胞减灭术(LANCE)。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1450-1454. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001584. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
7
Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery versus open laparotomy for epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.微创外科与开腹手术治疗上皮性卵巢癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Nov;190:42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
8
Incorporating robotic surgery into the management of ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.将机器人手术纳入新辅助化疗后卵巢癌的治疗管理中。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Nov;29(9):1341-1347. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000413. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Laparotomy minimally invasive surgery for ovarian cancer recurrence: a systematic review.剖腹手术治疗复发性卵巢癌的微创手术:一项系统评价
Gland Surg. 2020 Aug;9(4):1130-1139. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-353.
10
Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery in ovarian neoplasm (MISSION trial-NCT02324595): a feasibility study.卵巢肿瘤微创间隔减瘤手术(MISSION试验-NCT02324595):一项可行性研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):503.e1-503.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.922. Epub 2015 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Concordance of Radiological, Laparoscopic and Laparotomic Scoring to Predict Complete Cytoreduction in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.放射学、腹腔镜及剖腹手术评分在预测晚期卵巢癌女性患者肿瘤细胞减灭术彻底性方面的一致性
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 13;15(2):500. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020500.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative and Survival Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Surgery, Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy, for Ovarian Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助手术治疗卵巢癌的围手术期及生存结局:与腹腔镜手术和开腹手术的比较:一项网状Meta分析
J Oncol. 2022 Apr 30;2022:2084774. doi: 10.1155/2022/2084774. eCollection 2022.
2
The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Care of Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创手术在卵巢癌女性护理中的作用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):537-543. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
3
Assessing feasibility and perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive surgery compared with laparotomy for interval debulking surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
评估微创与剖腹手术相比在晚期上皮性卵巢癌间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗中的可行性和围手术期结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.052. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
4
Rethinking Radical Surgery in Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.对接受新辅助化疗的晚期卵巢癌患者进行间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术时根治性手术的再思考
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 24;9(4):1235. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041235.
5
Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic ovarian cancer: a national study in the United States.新辅助化疗后转移性卵巢癌的微创间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术:美国一项全国性研究
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Mar;301(3):863-866. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05442-4. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
6
The INTERNATIONAL MISSION study: minimally invasive surgery in ovarian neoplasms after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.INTERNATIONAL MISSION 研究:新辅助化疗后卵巢肿瘤的微创手术。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jan;29(1):5-9. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000012.
7
When Less Is More: Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared with Laparotomy for Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.当少即是多时:新辅助化疗后晚期卵巢癌间隔减瘤术的微创与剖腹手术比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):902-909. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.765. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
8
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.新辅助化疗后行间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术在晚期卵巢癌中的作用:一项对随机对照试验和观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 27;9(9):8614-8628. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23808. eCollection 2018 Feb 2.
9
Interval robotic cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer.晚期卵巢癌新辅助化疗后的间歇性机器人细胞减灭术
J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):245-250. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0720-2. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Minimal access surgery compared to laparotomy for secondary surgical cytoreduction in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma: Perioperative and oncologic outcomes.复发性卵巢癌患者二次手术细胞减灭术中微创手术与开腹手术的比较:围手术期及肿瘤学结局
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):263-267. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 17.