• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合医疗服务提供者对减药的意见、偏好和态度的问卷(CHOPPED问卷)的开发与验证

Development and Validation of Comprehensive Healthcare Providers' Opinions, Preferences, and Attitudes towards Deprescribing (CHOPPED Questionnaire).

作者信息

Bužančić Iva, Ortner Hadžiabdić Maja

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, A. Kovačića 1, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.

City Pharmacies Zagreb, Kralja Držislava 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Jul 1;10(4):76. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10040076.

DOI:10.3390/pharmacy10040076
PMID:35893715
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9326567/
Abstract

Successful implementation of deprescribing requires exploring healthcare professionals’ opinions, preferences, and attitudes towards deprescribing. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the questionnaire exploring healthcare providers’ opinions preferences and attitudes towards deprescribing (CHOPPED questionnaire). This was a cross-sectional on-line survey. A comprehensive 58-item questionnaire, in two versions (for pharmacists and physicians), was developed through an extensive literature review and interviews with experts. The questionnaire was validated, and its reliability was assessed through data collected from 356 pharmacists and 109 physicians. Exploratory factor analysis was performed, and 37- and 35-item questionnaires were developed. Ten factors were identified: knowledge, awareness, patient barriers and facilitators, competencies barriers and facilitators, collaboration barriers and facilitators, and healthcare system barriers and facilitators. The CHOPPED tool has satisfactory face, content (CVR > 0.62) (content validity ratio), construct, and criterion validity. The reliability statistics of all factors in both versions was acceptable with Cronbach’s alpha > 0.6. Test−retest reliability analysis showed that gamma rank correlations of total factor scores were strong and very strong (between 0.519 and 0.938). The CHOPPED tool can be used as a valid and reliable tool to explore healthcare providers’ opinions and attitudes toward discontinuing medications in the primary care setting in Croatia.

摘要

成功实施减药需要探究医疗保健专业人员对减药的看法、偏好和态度。本研究的目的是开发并验证一份探究医疗保健提供者对减药的看法、偏好和态度的问卷(CHOPPED问卷)。这是一项横断面在线调查。通过广泛的文献综述和专家访谈,开发了一份包含58个条目的综合问卷,有两个版本(分别针对药剂师和医生)。该问卷经过验证,并通过收集356名药剂师和109名医生的数据对其信度进行了评估。进行了探索性因素分析,得出了分别包含37个和35个条目的问卷。确定了十个因素:知识、意识、患者障碍与促进因素、能力障碍与促进因素、协作障碍与促进因素以及医疗保健系统障碍与促进因素。CHOPPED工具具有令人满意的表面效度、内容效度(CVR>0.62)(内容效度比)、结构效度和效标效度。两个版本中所有因素的信度统计结果均可接受,Cronbach's alpha>0.6。重测信度分析表明,总因素得分的伽马等级相关性很强(在0.519至0.938之间)。CHOPPED工具可作为一种有效且可靠的工具,用于探究克罗地亚初级保健环境中医疗保健提供者对停药的看法和态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fab/9326567/a663cf048c54/pharmacy-10-00076-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fab/9326567/a663cf048c54/pharmacy-10-00076-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fab/9326567/a663cf048c54/pharmacy-10-00076-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of Comprehensive Healthcare Providers' Opinions, Preferences, and Attitudes towards Deprescribing (CHOPPED Questionnaire).综合医疗服务提供者对减药的意见、偏好和态度的问卷(CHOPPED问卷)的开发与验证
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Jul 1;10(4):76. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10040076.
2
Differences in Factors Influencing Deprescribing between Primary Care Providers: Cross-Sectional Study.影响初级保健提供者药物减量的因素差异:横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 11;20(6):4957. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064957.
3
Development and validation of a tool to understand health care professionals' attitudes towards deprescribing (HATD) in older adults with limited life expectancy.开发和验证一种工具,以了解医疗保健专业人员对有限预期寿命的老年患者进行药物减量治疗的态度(HATD)。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Sep;18(9):3596-3601. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of a Spanish version of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire.跨文化调适与修订版患者对停药态度问卷(rPATD)西班牙文版的心理计量学验证。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 21;12(4):e050678. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050678.
5
Development and Validation of an Evaluation Tool to Measure the Effectiveness of a Smoking Cessation Training among Healthcare Providers in Malaysia: The Providers' Smoking Cessation Training Evaluation (ProSCiTE).开发和验证一种评估工具,以衡量马来西亚医疗保健提供者戒烟培训的效果:提供者戒烟培训评估(ProSCiTE)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 5;16(21):4297. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214297.
6
Development and Validation of the Revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) Questionnaire: Versions for Older Adults and Caregivers.修订版患者撤药态度(rPATD)问卷的编制与验证:老年人及照顾者版本
Drugs Aging. 2016 Dec;33(12):913-928. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0410-1.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in French.跨文化调适与修订后患者对减药态度问卷(rPATD)法语版的心理测量学验证。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Aug;17(8):1453-1462. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
Adaptation and validation of the revised Patients' Attitudes towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire for benzodiazepine receptor agonists.修订版患者对减停苯二氮䓬类药物态度问卷(rPATD)在苯二氮䓬类受体激动剂中的适应和验证。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Sep;19(9):1278-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.010. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
9
Development and validation of the patients' attitudes towards deprescribing (PATD) questionnaire.开发和验证患者对减药态度(PATD)问卷。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Feb;35(1):51-6. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9704-5. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
10
Deprescribing practice in a resource-limited setting: Healthcare providers' insights.在资源有限的情况下减少用药实践:医疗保健提供者的见解。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Sep;75(9):e14356. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14356. Epub 2021 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the feasibility of deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: GPs' insights on barriers, facilitators, and strategies.提高停用质子泵抑制剂的可行性:全科医生对障碍、促进因素及策略的见解
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 20;15:1468750. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1468750. eCollection 2024.
2
Differences in Factors Influencing Deprescribing between Primary Care Providers: Cross-Sectional Study.影响初级保健提供者药物减量的因素差异:横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 11;20(6):4957. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064957.
3
Recent Updates on Risk and Management Plans Associated with Polypharmacy in Older Population.

本文引用的文献

1
Influencers on deprescribing practice of primary healthcare providers in Nova Scotia: An examination using behavior change frameworks.新斯科舍省初级医疗保健提供者减药实践的影响因素:基于行为改变框架的研究
Med Access Point Care. 2020 Jun 3;4:2399202620922507. doi: 10.1177/2399202620922507. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
Effectiveness of pharmacist intervention for deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications: a prospective observational study.药师干预停用潜在不适当药物的有效性:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2022 Apr 5;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40780-022-00243-0.
3
Development and validation of a tool to understand health care professionals' attitudes towards deprescribing (HATD) in older adults with limited life expectancy.
老年人群多重用药相关风险及管理计划的最新进展
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Sep 13;7(5):97. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics7050097.
开发和验证一种工具,以了解医疗保健专业人员对有限预期寿命的老年患者进行药物减量治疗的态度(HATD)。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Sep;18(9):3596-3601. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
The "case" for case studies: why we need high-quality examples of global implementation research.案例研究的“实例”:为何我们需要全球实施研究的高质量范例。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Feb 16;3(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00227-5.
5
Assessing community pharmacists' attitudes towards identifying opportunities for deprescribing in clinical practice in Ireland.评估爱尔兰社区药剂师在临床实践中识别药物减量机会的态度。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2022 Jan 7;30(1):28-35. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riab079.
6
Excessive polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in 147 care homes: a cross-sectional study.147家养老院中的过度联合用药及潜在不适当处方:一项横断面研究。
BJGP Open. 2021 Dec 14;5(6). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0167. Print 2021.
7
Healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices toward deprescribing: a protocol of cross-sectional study (Desmedica Study-Brazil).医疗保健专业人员对药物减量的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究方案(Desmedica 研究-巴西)。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 2;11(8):e044312. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044312.
8
The Development of a Deprescribing Competency Framework in Geriatric Nursing Education.老年护理教育中减药能力框架的发展
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Jul 22;43(11):1939459211023805. doi: 10.1177/01939459211023805.
9
Community-based pharmacists' role in deprescribing: A systematic review.基于社区的药师在减少用药中的作用:系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;88(2):452-463. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14947. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
10
Leveraging implementation science to increase the translation of deprescribing evidence into practice.利用实施科学增加减少用药证据转化为实践的力度。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Mar;18(3):2550-2555. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.05.018. Epub 2021 Jun 6.