• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效及安全性对比研究。

A contrastive study on the clinical efficacy and safety oflaparoscopic myomectomy and high intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of uterine fibroids.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, The People's Hospital of Nanchuan, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Ginekol Pol. 2023;94(5):358-365. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2022.0034. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

DOI:10.5603/GP.a2022.0034
PMID:35894494
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study intended to compare the safety and clinical efficacy between two treatments of uterine fibroids: laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) and high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinical data were collected from 587 uterine fibroid patients who were treated in The People's Hospital of Nanchuan, Chongqing from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Among the patients, 287 cases were treated with HIFU (observation group), and 300 cases were treated with LM (control group). The progression-free survival (PFS) was taken as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included operation results (including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluid replacement), complications, hemoglobin level one month after surgery and clinical efficacy. In addition, the fibroid volume of the observation group before treatment and 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The operative time of observation group was evidently shortened compared to the control group, and the intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative fluid replacement of observation group were also considerably reduced (all p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the hemoglobin level between the two groups one month after surgery (p > 0.05). In terms of curative effect, the total effective rate of HIFU group and LM group was 98.6% (283/287) and 95.3% (286/300) respectively, with statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). In terms of complications, the incidence of bleeding and infection in HIFU group was obviously lower than that in LM group (both p < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in the remaining complications (all p > 0.05). Fibroid volume comparisons before treatment and 3, 6 and 12 months after operation in observation group showed that fibroid volume decreased significantly (all p < 0.05). The median follow-up time was 30.6 months. The mean PFS of patients in the observation group and control group was 29.71 months (95% CI 28.24-29.75) and 26.74 months (95% CI 26.49-28.33), respectively (HR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.76; Log-rank p = 0.0019).

CONCLUSIONS

HIFU could improve the intraoperative efficacy and reduce the complications of patients with uterine fibroids and has excellent performance in improving clinical efficacy and prolonging PFS. HIFU can be used as an alternative to surgical treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较两种子宫肌瘤治疗方法——腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术(LM)和高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)的安全性和临床疗效。

材料与方法

2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间,从重庆市南川区人民医院收集了 587 例子宫肌瘤患者的临床资料。其中 287 例接受 HIFU(观察组)治疗,300 例接受 LM(对照组)治疗。无进展生存期(PFS)为主要终点。次要终点包括手术结果(包括手术时间、术中出血量和术中液体置换)、并发症、术后 1 个月血红蛋白水平和临床疗效。此外,还分析了观察组治疗前和治疗后 3、6 和 12 个月的肌瘤体积。

结果

观察组的手术时间明显短于对照组,术中出血量和术中液体置换也明显减少(均 p < 0.05),但术后 1 个月两组血红蛋白水平无统计学差异(p > 0.05)。在疗效方面,HIFU 组和 LM 组的总有效率分别为 98.6%(283/287)和 95.3%(286/300),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在并发症方面,HIFU 组出血和感染的发生率明显低于 LM 组(均 p < 0.05),其余并发症发生率无统计学差异(均 p > 0.05)。观察组治疗前和治疗后 3、6 和 12 个月的肌瘤体积比较显示,肌瘤体积明显减小(均 p < 0.05)。中位随访时间为 30.6 个月。观察组和对照组患者的平均 PFS 分别为 29.71 个月(95%CI 28.24-29.75)和 26.74 个月(95%CI 26.49-28.33)(HR 0.47;95%CI,0.29 至 0.76;Log-rank p = 0.0019)。

结论

HIFU 可改善子宫肌瘤患者的术中疗效,减少并发症,在提高临床疗效和延长 PFS 方面表现出色。HIFU 可作为手术治疗的替代方法。

相似文献

1
A contrastive study on the clinical efficacy and safety oflaparoscopic myomectomy and high intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of uterine fibroids.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效及安全性对比研究。
Ginekol Pol. 2023;94(5):358-365. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2022.0034. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
2
High-intensity focused ultrasound and laparoscopic myomectomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a comparative study.高强度聚焦超声与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤的对比研究。
BJOG. 2017 Aug;124 Suppl 3:36-39. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14745.
3
A comparative analysis of pregnancy outcomes of patients with uterine fibroids after high intensity focused ultrasound ablation and laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study.高强度聚焦超声消融与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术后子宫肌瘤患者妊娠结局的对比分析:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):79-84. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1874547.
4
Feasibility, safety and efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound ablation as a preoperative treatment for challenging hysteroscopic myomectomy.高强度聚焦超声消融作为有挑战性的宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术术前治疗的可行性、安全性和有效性。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2024;41(1):2365974. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2024.2365974. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
5
Comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and secondary myomectomy for recurrent symptomatic uterine fibroids following myomectomy: a retrospective study.高强度聚焦超声消融与二次子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤剔除术后复发症状性子宫肌瘤的比较:一项回顾性研究。
BJOG. 2020 Oct;127(11):1422-1428. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16262. Epub 2020 May 3.
6
A comparison of the pregnancy outcomes between ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and laparoscopic myomectomy for uterine fibroids: a comparative study.超声引导高强度聚焦超声消融与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤的妊娠结局比较:一项对照研究。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):617-623. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1774081.
7
Comparison of outcomes of hysteroscopic myomectomy of type 2 submucous fibroids greater than 4 cm in diameter via pretreatment with HIFU or GnRH-a.经预处理的高强度聚焦超声或 GnRH-a 治疗直径大于 4cm 的 2 型黏膜下子宫肌瘤的宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的结局比较。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):183-188. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1874546.
8
Evaluation of the timing and safety of hysteroscopic myomectomy of large submucosal fibroids pretreated by high intensity focused ultrasound.高强度聚焦超声预处理的大型黏膜下子宫肌瘤宫腔镜切除术时机和安全性评估。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2023;40(1):2249275. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2249275.
9
Preliminary study on ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for treatment of broad ligament uterine fibroids.超声引导高强度聚焦超声消融术治疗阔韧带子宫肌瘤的初步研究。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2021 Sep;38(2):18-23. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1921287.
10
Laparoscopic Myomectomy with Temporary Bilateral Uterine Artery and Utero-Ovarian Vessels Occlusion Compared with Traditional Surgery for Uterine Fibroids: Blood Loss and Recurrence.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术联合临时双侧子宫动脉和卵巢血管阻断与传统手术治疗子宫肌瘤的对比:出血量和复发率。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84(6):548-554. doi: 10.1159/000499494. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the perioperative complications of high intensity focused ultrasound vs. laparoscopic surgery for uterine fibroids: a retrospective study.高强度聚焦超声与腹腔镜手术治疗子宫肌瘤围手术期并发症的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Front Surg. 2025 Jul 17;12:1568000. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1568000. eCollection 2025.
2
A systematic review of the side effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids.高强度聚焦超声消融子宫肌瘤副作用的系统评价
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Aug 21;37(6):947-956. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2387497. eCollection 2024.
3
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids: A Review.
高强度聚焦超声消融子宫肌瘤:综述
Cureus. 2023 Sep 4;15(9):e44680. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44680. eCollection 2023 Sep.