Suppr超能文献

根据 NAL 和 DSL 程序为混合性听力损失的成年人配骨锚式助听器。

Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids Fitted According to NAL and DSL Procedures in Adults with Mixed Hearing Loss.

机构信息

ENT Audiology and Phoniatric Unit, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Otoneurosurgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

出版信息

J Int Adv Otol. 2022 Jul;18(4):302-307. doi: 10.5152/iao.2022.21270.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bone-anchored hearing aids represent a valid alternative for patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss who cannot use hear- ing aids. To date, these devices have given good audiological results, thanks to various fitting prescription programs (i.e., National Acoustic Laboratories and Desired Sensation Level). The aim of this study is to compare 2 types of fitting algorithms (National Acoustic Laboratories and Desired Sensation Level) implemented for bone-anchored hearing devices.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 10 patients followed at our operative unit, suffering from bilateral symmetrical mixed hearing loss and who underwent bone-anchored hearing aid implantation. All patients experienced each prescriptive procedure, National Acoustic Laboratories and Desired Sensation Level, for 7 months (on average), and they were subjected to audiological tests and questionnaires to evaluate the best program.

RESULTS

National Acoustic Laboratories and Desired Sensation Level prescriptions yielded similar results. Desired Sensation Level allowed less amplification of the low frequencies than the National Acoustic Laboratories prescription, and these differences were the only statistically sig- nificant. Desired Sensation Level allowed better disyllabic word and sentence recognition scores only in quiet and not in noisy conditions. The subjective questionnaires showed similar results. At the end of the trial sessions, more patients (60%) definitively chose the Desired Sensation Level program for their device. These patients were those with a worse hearing threshold.

CONCLUSION

The 2 prescriptive programs allowed similar results although patients with a worse threshold seem to prefer the DSL program. This is the first evaluation of the 2 prescriptive programs, National Acoustic Laboratories versus Desired Sensation Level, for bone conduction devices available in the literature. Further studies are needed to confirm this initial finding.

摘要

背景

骨锚式助听器是一种有效的替代方案,适用于无法使用助听器的传导性/混合性听力损失患者。迄今为止,由于各种适配处方程序(即国家声学实验室和期望感觉水平),这些设备已经取得了良好的听力结果。本研究旨在比较两种骨传导听力设备的适配算法(国家声学实验室和期望感觉水平)。

方法

我们回顾性地招募了 10 名在我们手术单位接受双侧对称混合性听力损失并接受骨锚式助听器植入的患者。所有患者都经历了 7 个月(平均)的每个规定程序,即国家声学实验室和期望感觉水平,并接受了听力测试和问卷调查,以评估最佳方案。

结果

国家声学实验室和期望感觉水平处方产生了相似的结果。期望感觉水平允许低频放大的程度低于国家声学实验室处方,这些差异是唯一具有统计学意义的差异。期望感觉水平仅在安静而非嘈杂条件下允许更好的双音节词和句子识别分数。主观问卷也显示出相似的结果。在试验阶段结束时,更多的患者(60%)最终选择了期望感觉水平程序用于他们的设备。这些患者是那些听力阈值较差的患者。

结论

虽然听力阈值较差的患者似乎更喜欢 DSL 程序,但这两种处方程序允许获得相似的结果。这是文献中首次对骨传导设备的两种处方程序(国家声学实验室与期望感觉水平)进行评估。需要进一步的研究来证实这一初步发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验