Suppr超能文献

模拟劣药和假药的健康和经济影响:对现有模型和方法的综述。

Modeling the Health and Economic Impact of Substandard and Falsified Medicines: A Review of Existing Models and Approaches.

机构信息

Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Department of Maternal and Child Health, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Jul 13;107(1):14-20. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1133.

Abstract

Substandard and falsified medicines are harmful to patients, causing prolonged illness, side effects, and preventable deaths. Moreover, they have an impact on the health system and society more broadly by leading to additional care, higher disease burden, productivity losses and loss of trust in health care. Models that estimate the health and economic impacts of substandard and falsified medicines can be useful for regulators to contextualize the problem and to make an economic case for solutions. Yet these models have not been systematically catalogued to date. We reviewed existing models that estimate the health and economic impact of substandard and falsified medicines to describe the varying modeling approaches and gaps in knowledge. We compared model characteristics, data sources, assumptions, and limitations. Seven models were identified. The models assessed the impact of antimalarial (n = 5) or antibiotic (n = 2) quality at a national (n = 4), regional (n = 2), or global (n = 1) level. Most models conducted uncertainty analysis and provided ranges around potential outcomes. We found that models are lacking for other medicines, few countries' data have been analyzed, and capturing population heterogeneity remains a challenge. Providing the best estimates of the impact of substandard and falsified medicines on a level that is actionable for decision-makers is important. To enable this, research on the impact of substandard and falsified medicines should be expanded to more medicine types and classes and tailored to more countries that are affected, with greater specificity.

摘要

劣药和假药对患者有害,导致病情延长、副作用和可预防的死亡。此外,它们通过导致额外的护理、更高的疾病负担、生产力损失和对医疗保健的信任丧失,对更广泛的卫生系统和社会产生影响。用于估计劣药和假药对健康和经济影响的模型可以帮助监管机构了解问题的背景,并为解决方案提供经济依据。然而,迄今为止,这些模型尚未被系统地编目。我们回顾了现有的用于估计劣药和假药对健康和经济影响的模型,以描述不同的建模方法和知识差距。我们比较了模型特征、数据源、假设和局限性。确定了七个模型。这些模型评估了国家(n=5)、地区(n=2)或全球(n=1)层面上抗疟药(n=5)或抗生素(n=2)质量的影响。大多数模型进行了不确定性分析,并提供了潜在结果的范围。我们发现,其他药物的模型缺乏,很少有国家的数据进行了分析,并且捕捉人口异质性仍然是一个挑战。提供劣药和假药对决策者可操作层面的影响的最佳估计非常重要。为此,应该扩大对劣药和假药影响的研究,涵盖更多的药物类型和类别,并针对更多受影响的国家进行定制,以提高针对性。

相似文献

2
The economic impact of substandard and falsified antimalarial medications in Nigeria.
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 15;14(8):e0217910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217910. eCollection 2019.
4
Impact of substandard and falsified antimalarials in Zambia: application of the SAFARI model.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08852-w.
5
Poor-quality antimalarials further health inequities in Uganda.
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Dec 1;34(Supplement_3):iii36-iii47. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz012.
9
Fighting trafficking of falsified and substandard medicinal products in Russia.
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S37-40. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150681.
10
Surveillance for falsified and substandard medicines in Africa and Asia by local organizations using the low-cost GPHF Minilab.
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0184165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184165. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

4
Substandard antibiotics and their clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients in southern Malawi: a pilot study.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 18;16:1535501. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1535501. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing the return on investment of technologies to detect substandard and falsified amoxicillin: A Kenya case study.
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 18;18(1):e0268661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268661. eCollection 2023.
3
Assessing the Impact of Substandard and Falsified Antimalarials in Benin.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Nov 8;106(6):1770-7. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0450.
4
Implementation of field detection devices for antimalarial quality screening in Lao PDR-A cost-effectiveness analysis.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Sep 30;15(9):e0009539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009539. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Cost savings of paper analytical devices (PADs) to detect substandard and falsified antibiotics: Kenya case study.
Med Access Point Care. 2021 Jan-Dec;5. doi: 10.1177/2399202620980303. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
Impact of substandard and falsified antimalarials in Zambia: application of the SAFARI model.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08852-w.
7
Importance of medicine quality in achieving universal health coverage.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0232966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232966. eCollection 2020.
8
COVID-19 and risks to the supply and quality of tests, drugs, and vaccines.
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jun;8(6):e754-e755. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30136-4. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
9
Poor-quality antimalarials further health inequities in Uganda.
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Dec 1;34(Supplement_3):iii36-iii47. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz012.
10
Global access to quality-assured medical products: the Oxford Statement and call to action.
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Dec;7(12):e1609-e1611. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30426-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验