• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性性别对非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者短期结局的影响。

The Effect of Female Sex on Short-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Feb 10;38(1):110-123. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0301.

DOI:10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0301
PMID:35895983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10010711/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

According to the American Heart Association guideline for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), female patients undergoing on-pump CABG (ONCAB) are at higher risk of short-term adverse outcomes than male patients. However, whether off-pump CABG (OPCAB) can improve the short-term outcome of female patients compared to ONCAB remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis to study the effect of the female sex on short-term outcomes of OPCAB vs. ONCAB. A total of 31,115 patients were enrolled in 12 studies, including 20,245 females who underwent ONCAB and 10,910 females who underwent OPCAB.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality in female patients who underwent OPCAB was significantly lower than in those in the ONCAB group with (2.7% vs. 3.4%; odds ratio [OR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.89) and without (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.89) adjustment for cardiovascular risk factor. The incidence of postoperative stroke in female patients who underwent OPCAB was lower than in those in the ONCAB group (1.2% vs. 2.1%; OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.48-0.73) before cardiovascular risk factor adjustment but was not significant (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0,66-1.16) after adjustment. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction between women who underwent OPCAB and those in the ONCAB group (1.3% vs. 2.3%; OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.54-1.43).

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the American Heart Association CABG guideline, female patients who had OPCAB don't have unfavorable outcomes compared with the ONCAB group.

摘要

介绍

根据美国心脏协会冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)指南,与男性患者相比,行体外循环下 CABG(ONCAB)的女性患者短期不良结局风险更高。然而,与 ONCAB 相比,非体外循环下 CABG(OPCAB)是否能改善女性患者的短期结局尚不清楚。

方法

我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以研究女性性别对 OPCAB 与 ONCAB 短期结局的影响。共有 31115 名患者纳入 12 项研究,其中 20245 名女性行 ONCAB,10910 名女性行 OPCAB。

结果

与 ONCAB 组相比,行 OPCAB 的女性患者院内死亡率显著降低(2.7% vs. 3.4%;比值比 [OR] 0.76;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.65-0.89),无论是否对心血管危险因素进行校正。与 ONCAB 组相比,行 OPCAB 的女性患者术后卒中发生率较低(1.2% vs. 2.1%;OR 0.59;95% CI 0.48-0.73),但在调整心血管危险因素后差异无统计学意义(OR 0.87;95% CI 0.66-1.16)。行 OPCAB 的女性患者术后心肌梗死发生率与 ONCAB 组无显著差异(1.3% vs. 2.3%;OR 0.88;95% CI 0.54-1.43)。

结论

与美国心脏协会 CABG 指南相反,行 OPCAB 的女性患者与 ONCAB 组相比结局并无不利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/2eeacbe6e9b8/rbccv-38-01-0110-g13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/edb9c9c0d016/rbccv-38-01-0110-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/84d16095a488/rbccv-38-01-0110-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/eec3ee6e5314/rbccv-38-01-0110-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/cbe5da437c0e/rbccv-38-01-0110-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/8c32d671f137/rbccv-38-01-0110-g05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/bbbb125f1abe/rbccv-38-01-0110-g06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/eaecde85d91d/rbccv-38-01-0110-g07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/1e8b2fdf7770/rbccv-38-01-0110-g08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/e698d009e4b6/rbccv-38-01-0110-g09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/647012a1c7e2/rbccv-38-01-0110-g10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/24e507bf1a09/rbccv-38-01-0110-g11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/f74ef907b3ab/rbccv-38-01-0110-g12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/2eeacbe6e9b8/rbccv-38-01-0110-g13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/edb9c9c0d016/rbccv-38-01-0110-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/84d16095a488/rbccv-38-01-0110-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/eec3ee6e5314/rbccv-38-01-0110-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/cbe5da437c0e/rbccv-38-01-0110-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/8c32d671f137/rbccv-38-01-0110-g05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/bbbb125f1abe/rbccv-38-01-0110-g06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/eaecde85d91d/rbccv-38-01-0110-g07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/1e8b2fdf7770/rbccv-38-01-0110-g08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/e698d009e4b6/rbccv-38-01-0110-g09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/647012a1c7e2/rbccv-38-01-0110-g10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/24e507bf1a09/rbccv-38-01-0110-g11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/f74ef907b3ab/rbccv-38-01-0110-g12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a577/10010711/2eeacbe6e9b8/rbccv-38-01-0110-g13.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Female Sex on Short-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.女性性别对非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者短期结局的影响。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Feb 10;38(1):110-123. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0301.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly.一项对比较老年患者非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的随机对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2022 Feb;63(1):60-68. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.21.12012-9. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
3
Risk-adjusted analysis of long-term outcomes after on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.风险调整后分析非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Nov 22;33(6):857-865. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab179.
4
Comparing the outcome of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation.比较术前心房颤动患者体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Sep;13(3):288-92. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2011.270249. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
5
Significance of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting compared with percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score analysis.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的意义:倾向评分分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.04.004.
6
Hybrid robotic off-pump versus conventional on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery in women.杂交机器人非体外循环与传统体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术在女性中的比较。
J Card Surg. 2022 Apr;37(4):895-905. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16247. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
7
Impact of increasing degrees of renal impairment on outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting: the off-pump advantage.肾功能损害程度增加对冠状动脉旁路移植术结果的影响:非体外循环的优势。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Oct;44(4):732-42. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt053. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
8
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel disease and enlarged ventricles.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术治疗三支血管病变合并心室扩大患者的疗效比较
Ann Saudi Med. 2014 May-Jun;34(3):222-8. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2014.222.
9
Five-year outcomes of off and on-pump CABG: Insights from PROMOTE Patency Trial.不停跳和体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 5 年的结果:PROMOTE 通畅试验的见解。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2023 Oct;31(8):659-666. doi: 10.1177/02184923231197642. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
10
Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Does Not Confer Superior Outcomes Among Frail Patients.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术在体弱患者中并未带来更好的疗效。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Jun 1;220:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.03.017. Epub 2024 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.《2 型糖尿病患者稳定型冠状动脉疾病的临床管理:美国心脏协会的科学声明》。
Circulation. 2020 May 12;141(19):e779-e806. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000766. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
2
Do women benefit more than men from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting?非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术对女性的益处是否大于男性?
Neth Heart J. 2019 Dec;27(12):629-635. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-01333-9.
3
New Strategies for Surgical Myocardial Revascularization.
新的外科心肌血运重建策略。
Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138(19):2160-2168. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035956.
4
Complete arterial revascularization using bilateral internal mammary artery in T-graft technique for multivessel coronary artery disease in on- or off-pump approach: does gender lose its historical impact on clinical outcome?经皮冠状动脉旁路移植术与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术应用 T 型移植术双侧内乳动脉完全血运重建治疗多支冠状动脉疾病:性别对临床结果是否仍具有历史影响?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Nov 1;52(5):917-923. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx287.
5
Should blood pressure reduction be aggressive in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease?高血压合并冠状动脉疾病患者的血压降低是否应积极进行?
Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2061-2062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31398-8. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
6
2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2016美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠状动脉疾病患者双联抗血小板治疗持续时间的指南聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1082-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.513. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
7
Glycemic management in patients with coronary artery disease and prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus.冠状动脉疾病合并糖尿病前期或2型糖尿病患者的血糖管理
Circulation. 2014 Jun 17;129(24):2567-73. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006634.
8
Off-pump versus on-pump revascularization in females: a meta-analysis of observational studies.女性非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术:观察性研究的荟萃分析
Perfusion. 2014 Sep;29(5):385-96. doi: 10.1177/0267659114525985. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
9
Off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days.非体外循环或体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 30 天。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 19;366(16):1489-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200388. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
10
2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会冠状动脉旁路移植手术指南。美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告。与美国胸外科协会、心血管麻醉医师协会和胸外科医师协会合作制定。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e123-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Nov 7.