• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

昆士兰堕胎合法化后的终止妊娠情况:对一家提供全方位堕胎咨询服务组织的客户记录进行的内容分析

Termination of pregnancy in Queensland post-decriminalisation: a content analysis of client records from an all-options pregnancy counselling organisation.

作者信息

Cleetus Maryanne, Lazarou Mattea, Tooker Siân, Jenkinson Bec, Dean Judith A

机构信息

School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia.

Children by Choice, Suite 3B Level 3/49 Sherwood Road, Toowong, Qld 4066, Australia.

出版信息

Sex Health. 2022 Dec;19(6):491-500. doi: 10.1071/SH22059.

DOI:10.1071/SH22059
PMID:35896168
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Termination of pregnancy (ToP) was decriminalised in Queensland, Australia, in December 2018. Although approximately 14 000 terminations are performed in Queensland annually, decriminalisation had addressed a known barrier to ToP access by supporting the legal right to access and enabling safe and regulated public pathways to ToP care. The post-decriminalised ToP experience in Queensland is unknown. Therefore, this study explored the reported reasons clients access information and support from an all-options pregnancy counselling service in Queensland with the aim of identifying the facilitators and barriers accessing ToP that remain post-decriminalisation in Queensland.

METHODS

A two-part qualitative conventional and directed content analysis approach guided by the Socioecological Model was used to examine counsellor notes on interactions with clients (n =1933) between December 2018 and June 2020 at an all-options pregnancy counselling service in Queensland.

FINDINGS

Key reasons for contacting the service were for financial assistance, ToP information, and support for decision making. Facilitators and barriers affecting ToP access interconnected across the Socioecological Model levels highlighting affordability, violence, stigma, knowledge, and information as key factors influencing ToP access post-decriminalisation in Queensland.

CONCLUSIONS

Inclusive multisectoral action to support reproductive autonomy is needed in Queensland. Following decriminalisation, cost, stigma, and intimate partner violence continue to impede access to safe, compassionate, and timely abortion care. Future models of care must eliminate these barriers by developing public models of service provision, investing in workforce development, fully utilising the capacity of that workforce, and creating stronger connections between sexual and reproductive health and intimate partner violence services.

摘要

背景

2018年12月,澳大利亚昆士兰州将终止妊娠合法化。尽管昆士兰州每年约有14000例终止妊娠手术,但合法化通过支持获取终止妊娠的合法权利以及建立安全且规范的终止妊娠护理公共途径,解决了一个已知的获取终止妊娠服务的障碍。昆士兰州终止妊娠合法化后的情况尚不清楚。因此,本研究探讨了昆士兰州一家提供全方位选择的妊娠咨询服务机构中,客户获取信息及支持的报告原因,旨在确定昆士兰州终止妊娠合法化后仍存在的获取终止妊娠服务的促进因素和障碍。

方法

采用由社会生态模型指导的两部分定性常规和定向内容分析方法,研究2018年12月至2020年6月期间昆士兰州一家提供全方位选择的妊娠咨询服务机构中咨询师与客户互动的记录(n = 1933)。

结果

联系该服务的主要原因是寻求经济援助、获取终止妊娠信息以及获得决策支持。影响获取终止妊娠服务的促进因素和障碍在社会生态模型的各个层面相互关联,突出了可负担性、暴力、耻辱感、知识和信息是影响昆士兰州终止妊娠合法化后获取终止妊娠服务的关键因素。

结论

昆士兰州需要采取包容性的多部门行动来支持生殖自主权。合法化后,成本、耻辱感和亲密伴侣暴力继续阻碍人们获得安全、人道且及时的堕胎护理。未来的护理模式必须通过开发公共服务提供模式、投资于劳动力发展、充分利用该劳动力的能力以及在性健康和生殖健康与亲密伴侣暴力服务之间建立更紧密的联系来消除这些障碍。

相似文献

1
Termination of pregnancy in Queensland post-decriminalisation: a content analysis of client records from an all-options pregnancy counselling organisation.昆士兰堕胎合法化后的终止妊娠情况:对一家提供全方位堕胎咨询服务组织的客户记录进行的内容分析
Sex Health. 2022 Dec;19(6):491-500. doi: 10.1071/SH22059.
2
Women's experiences of accessing a medical termination of pregnancy through a Queensland regional sexual health service: a qualitative study.通过昆士兰地区性健康服务机构进行人工流产的女性经历:一项定性研究。
Sex Health. 2021 Jul;18(3):232-238. doi: 10.1071/SH20220.
3
Comprehensive Decriminalisation of Abortion: An Analysis of Concept, Arguments and Regulatory Frameworks.全面堕胎非罪化:概念、论点及监管框架分析。
J Law Med. 2021 Dec;28(4):1127-1141.
4
Unmet counselling need amongst women accessing an induced abortion service in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔省接受人工流产服务的女性中未得到满足的咨询需求。
Contraception. 2016 Nov;94(5):473-477. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
5
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共四部分,第二部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
6
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共4部分,第1部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
7
A qualitative study of safe abortion and post-abortion family planning service experiences of women attending private facilities in Kenya.肯尼亚私人医疗机构中接受人工流产和人工流产后计划生育服务的女性的安全流产及计划生育服务经历的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2018 Apr 24;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0509-4.
8
Cost of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and postpartum to health services: a data linkage study in Queensland, Australia.孕期和产后亲密伴侣暴力对卫生服务的成本:澳大利亚昆士兰州的一项数据链接研究。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2021 Oct;24(5):773-779. doi: 10.1007/s00737-021-01130-7. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
9
Termination of pregnancy in Tasmania: access and service provision from the perspective of GPs.塔斯马尼亚州的终止妊娠:全科医生视角下的可及性和服务提供。
Aust J Prim Health. 2021 Aug;27(4):297-303. doi: 10.1071/PY20288.
10
Women's access to abortion after 20 weeks' gestation for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: Views and experiences of doctors in New South Wales and Queensland.妊娠20周后因胎儿染色体异常进行堕胎的女性情况:新南威尔士州和昆士兰州医生的观点与经历
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Apr;55(2):144-8. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12305. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting healthy sexual practices to prevent youth pregnancy in Vhembe district.在文贝区推广健康的性行为以预防青少年怀孕。
Curationis. 2025 Aug 7;48(1):e1-e10. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2711.
2
The 'Institutional Lottery': Institutional variation in the processes involved in accessing late abortion in Victoria, Australia.“机构抽签”:澳大利亚维多利亚州晚期堕胎获取过程中的机构差异
Womens Stud Int Forum. 2023 Nov-Dec;101:102822. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102822.
3
'The tabloid test': a qualitative interview study on the function and purpose of termination of pregnancy review committees in Victoria, Australia.
“小报测试”:一项关于澳大利亚维多利亚州终止妊娠审查委员会功能和目的的定性访谈研究。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jul 18;20(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01624-w.