Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany
Department of Welfare and Health Care, Ludwigshafen University of Business and Society, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 27;12(7):e060673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060673.
Women are more likely than men to provide unpaid care work. Previous research has shown that lack of support for various forms of unpaid care work and work-family conflicts have negative impacts on caregivers' mental health, especially among female caregivers. COVID-19 containment measures may exacerbate existing gender inequalities both in terms of unpaid care work and adverse mental health outcomes. This scoping review protocol describes the systematic approach to review published literature from March 2020 onwards to identify empirical studies and grey literature on the mental health impact of COVID-19 containment measures on subgroups of unpaid caregivers at the intersection of gender and other categories of social difference (eg, ethnicity, age, class) in Europe.
This scoping review is informed and guided by Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. We will search the databases Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, Social Sciences Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts as well as Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) and hand-search reference lists of selected articles to identify relevant peer-reviewed studies. We will conduct a grey literature search using Google Scholar and targeted hand-search on known international and European websites and include reports, working papers, policy briefs and book chapters that meet the inclusion criteria. Studies that report gender-segregated findings for mental health outcomes associated with unpaid care work in the context of COVID-19 containment measures in Europe will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen all abstracts and full texts for inclusion, and extract general information, study characteristics and relevant findings. Results will be synthesized narratively.
This study is a review of published literature; ethics approval is not warranted. The findings of this study will inform public health research and policy. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.
女性比男性更有可能提供无偿护理工作。先前的研究表明,缺乏对各种形式的无偿护理工作和工作与家庭冲突的支持,对护理人员的心理健康产生负面影响,尤其是对女性护理人员。COVID-19 遏制措施可能会加剧无偿护理工作和不良心理健康结果方面现有的性别不平等。本范围综述方案描述了一种系统方法,用于审查 2020 年 3 月以后发表的文献,以确定关于 COVID-19 遏制措施对性别和其他社会差异类别(如种族、年龄、阶级)交叉点的无偿护理人员亚组的心理健康影响的实证研究和灰色文献在欧洲。
本范围综述以 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法论框架为依据和指导。我们将搜索 Medline、PsycINFO、Scopus、CINAHL、社会科学摘要、社会学摘要以及应用社会科学索引和摘要(ASSIA)等数据库,并对手头选定文章的参考文献进行手工搜索,以确定相关的同行评议研究。我们将使用 Google Scholar 进行灰色文献搜索,并针对已知的国际和欧洲网站进行有针对性的手工搜索,包括符合纳入标准的报告、工作文件、政策简报和章节。将纳入报告与 COVID-19 遏制措施相关的无偿护理工作中与心理健康结果相关的性别隔离发现的研究。两名审查员将独立筛选所有摘要和全文以确定纳入标准,并提取一般信息、研究特征和相关发现。结果将以叙述方式综合。
本研究是对已发表文献的综述;不需要伦理批准。本研究的结果将为公共卫生研究和政策提供信息。研究结果将通过同行评议的出版物和会议演示文稿进行传播。