• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验中患者和健康志愿者对临床研究的认知。

Perception of clinical research among patients and healthy volunteers of clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Clinical Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;78(10):1647-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03366-3. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-022-03366-3
PMID:35896802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9482583/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Clinical research relies on data from patients and volunteers, yet the target sample size is often not achieved. Here, we assessed the perception of clinical research among clinical trial participants to improve the recruitment process for future studies.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center descriptive and exploratory study of 300 current or former participants in various phase I-III clinical trials. Questionnaires were either distributed to current clinical trial participants or emailed to former subjects.

RESULTS

Subjects strongly agreed or agreed that contributing to improving medical care (> 81%), contributing to scientific research (> 79%), and trusting their treating physicians (> 77%) were motives for study participation. Among healthy volunteers, financial motives positively correlated with the number of clinical trials they had participated in (p < 0.05). Higher age positively correlated with expectation of best available treatment during study participation among patients (p < 0.05). Less than 8% of all subjects expressed "great concern" about the potential risks of sharing their personal information as part of the study. Subjects displayed "great trust" or "trust" in medical staff (86.6%) and in government research institutions (76.4%), and "very little trust" or "little trust" in pharmaceutical companies (35.4%) and health insurance companies (16.9%).

CONCLUSION

Altruistic motives and trust in treating physicians were predominant motives for clinical trial participation. Older patients expected to receive the best available treatment during participation. Healthy volunteers who reported financial motives had participated in more clinical trials. Consistent with great trust in medical staff and government research institutions, little concern was expressed about the misuse of personal data during the trial.

摘要

目的

临床研究依赖于患者和志愿者提供的数据,但通常无法达到目标样本量。在这里,我们评估了临床试验参与者对临床研究的看法,以改进未来研究的招募流程。

方法

我们对 300 名正在参加或曾经参加过各种 I-III 期临床试验的参与者进行了一项单中心描述性和探索性研究。问卷要么分发给当前的临床试验参与者,要么通过电子邮件发送给以前的研究对象。

结果

受试者强烈同意或同意参与研究的动机是改善医疗保健(>81%)、促进科学研究(>79%)和信任他们的治疗医生(>77%)。在健康志愿者中,经济动机与他们参加的临床试验数量呈正相关(p<0.05)。年龄越高,患者在研究期间对接受最佳可用治疗的期望越高(p<0.05)。不到 8%的受试者对在研究中分享个人信息的潜在风险表示“非常关注”。受试者对医务人员(86.6%)和政府研究机构(76.4%)表现出“极大的信任”或“信任”,对制药公司(35.4%)和医疗保险公司(16.9%)表现出“很少信任”或“不信任”。

结论

利他主义动机和对治疗医生的信任是参与临床试验的主要动机。年龄较大的患者期望在参与期间接受最佳可用的治疗。报告有经济动机的健康志愿者参加了更多的临床试验。与对医务人员和政府研究机构的极大信任一致,对试验期间个人数据滥用的担忧很少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/9482583/c4a5752b9d86/228_2022_3366_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/9482583/47c0b7a05bc9/228_2022_3366_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/9482583/97bec616d091/228_2022_3366_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/9482583/712736c84133/228_2022_3366_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/9482583/5de5be78f39b/228_2022_3366_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/9482583/c4a5752b9d86/228_2022_3366_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/9482583/47c0b7a05bc9/228_2022_3366_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/9482583/97bec616d091/228_2022_3366_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/9482583/712736c84133/228_2022_3366_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/9482583/5de5be78f39b/228_2022_3366_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/9482583/c4a5752b9d86/228_2022_3366_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perception of clinical research among patients and healthy volunteers of clinical trials.临床试验中患者和健康志愿者对临床研究的认知。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;78(10):1647-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03366-3. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
2
A Study on the Characteristics of Healthy Volunteers who Participate in Phase I Clinical Trials in Korea.韩国参与 I 期临床试验的健康志愿者特征研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr;17(1-2):193-212. doi: 10.1177/15562646211034275. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
3
Motives and perception of healthy volunteers who participate in experiments.参与实验的健康志愿者的动机与认知。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;45(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/BF00315344.
4
Phase I trial compensation: How much do healthy volunteers actually earn from clinical trial enrollment?I 期临床试验补偿:健康志愿者参与临床试验实际能挣多少?
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):477-487. doi: 10.1177/17407745211011069. Epub 2021 May 2.
5
The motivations, barriers, and sociodemographic characteristics of healthy Chinese volunteers in phase I research.中国健康志愿者参与 I 期研究的动机、障碍和社会人口学特征。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;77(4):557-568. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-03040-6. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
Motivation for participation in clinical trials of drugs for the treatment of asthma, seasonal allergic rhinitis, and perennial nonallergic rhinitis.参与治疗哮喘、季节性变应性鼻炎和常年性非变应性鼻炎药物临床试验的动机。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996 Apr;76(4):348-54. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60036-1.
7
Healthy Volunteers' Perceptions of the Benefits of Their Participation in Phase I Clinical Trials.健康志愿者对参与I期临床试验益处的认知
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Dec;13(5):494-510. doi: 10.1177/1556264618804962. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
Motivation, recruitment, and screening of volunteers for a phase I/II HIV preventive vaccine trial in Thailand.泰国一项I/II期HIV预防性疫苗试验中志愿者的招募动机、招募及筛选
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998 Jun 1;18(2):171-7. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199806010-00009.
9
Why not? Motivations for entering a volunteer register for clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic.为什么不呢?在 COVID-19 大流行期间参与临床试验志愿者登记的动机。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;78(11):1791-1800. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03385-0. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
10
Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of the public and out-patients.临床试验的伦理问题:公众和门诊患者的态度
J Intern Med. 1999 Jun;245(6):571-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1999.00502.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Perception of Clinical Trials and Its Predictors Among Polish Adults.波兰成年人对临床试验的公众认知及其预测因素
J Clin Med. 2025 May 8;14(10):3279. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103279.
2
Patient-Reported Factors Influencing Clinical Trial Participation: An In-depth Analysis of Patients With Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis.患者报告的影响临床试验参与的因素:对狼疮和类风湿关节炎患者的深入分析。
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2025 Apr;7(4):e70035. doi: 10.1002/acr2.70035.
3
Knowledge and perception of a clinical trial among the participants: An experience from oral cholera vaccine study in Koshi Province, Nepal.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic literature review of attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on consent.关于对卫生行政和临床试验数据二次使用与共享态度的系统文献综述:以同意为重点。
Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;10(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01663-z.
2
Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Real World Evidence: Neither Magic Nor Myth.随机对照试验与真实世界证据:非魔亦非幻。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 May;109(5):1212-1218. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2083. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Association between response rates and monetary incentives in sample study: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
参与者对临床试验的认知:来自尼泊尔科希省口服霍乱疫苗研究的经验。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2416760. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2416760. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
4
Using patient portals for large-scale recruitment of individuals underrepresented in biomedical research: an evaluation of engagement patterns throughout the patient portal recruitment process at a single site within the All of Us Research Program.利用患者门户在生物医学研究中代表性不足的个体中进行大规模招募:对 All of Us 研究计划中一个单一站点的患者门户招募过程中的参与模式进行评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;31(10):2328-2336. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae135.
5
Commentary on 'Attitude and perception toward clinical trials in India among patients and patient bystanders visiting Indian ophthalmology clinical trial network: A multicentric, cross-sectional survey'.对“印度眼科临床试验网络中患者及患者旁观者对印度临床试验的态度和认知:一项多中心横断面调查”的评论
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;71(10):3342-3343. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1743_23.
6
Participant Perceptions in a Long-term Clinical Trial of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.常染色体显性多囊肾病长期临床试验中的参与者认知
Kidney Med. 2023 Jun 29;5(9):100691. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100691. eCollection 2023 Sep.
样本研究中反应率与货币激励之间的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Postgrad Med J. 2021 Aug;97(1150):501-510. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137868. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
4
The Magic of Randomization versus the Myth of Real-World Evidence.随机化的魔力与真实世界证据的神话
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):674-678. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1901642.
5
The path to open data.开放数据之路。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 Sep;15(9):521. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0188-6.
6
Healthy Volunteers' Perceptions of the Benefits of Their Participation in Phase I Clinical Trials.健康志愿者对参与I期临床试验益处的认知
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Dec;13(5):494-510. doi: 10.1177/1556264618804962. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
7
Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review.与失败的临床试验相关的因素及提高成功可能性的机会:一项综述。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Aug 7;11:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
8
Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing.临床试验参与者对数据共享风险和收益的看法。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 7;378(23):2202-2211. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1713258.
9
Challenges in recruitment and retention of clinical trial subjects.招募和留住临床试验受试者面临的挑战。
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):137-43. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184820.
10
A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.关于美国个人对广泛同意和数据共享观点的系统文献综述。
Genet Med. 2016 Jul;18(7):663-71. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.138. Epub 2015 Nov 19.