• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Phase I trial compensation: How much do healthy volunteers actually earn from clinical trial enrollment?I 期临床试验补偿:健康志愿者参与临床试验实际能挣多少?
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):477-487. doi: 10.1177/17407745211011069. Epub 2021 May 2.
2
Healthy volunteers' perceptions of risk in US Phase I clinical trials: A mixed-methods study.健康志愿者对美国 I 期临床试验风险的认知:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002698. eCollection 2018 Nov.
3
Using "clinical trial diaries" to track patterns of participation for serial healthy volunteers in U.S. phase I studies.使用“临床试验日记”追踪美国I期研究中连续健康志愿者的参与模式。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Feb;10(1):65-75. doi: 10.1177/1556264614568280. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
4
Motivations, enrollment decisions, and socio-demographic characteristics of healthy volunteers in phase 1 research.1 期研究中健康志愿者的入组动机、入组决策和社会人口学特征。
Clin Trials. 2017 Oct;14(5):526-536. doi: 10.1177/1740774517722130. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
5
Healthy volunteers in US phase I clinical trials: Sociodemographic characteristics and participation over time.美国 I 期临床试验中的健康志愿者:社会人口学特征和随时间的参与情况。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):e0256994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256994. eCollection 2021.
6
Phase 1 healthy volunteer willingness to participate and enrollment preferences.I 期健康志愿者参与意愿和入组偏好。
Clin Trials. 2017 Oct;14(5):537-546. doi: 10.1177/1740774517722131. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
7
To report or not to report: Exploring healthy volunteers' rationales for disclosing adverse events in Phase I drug trials.报告还是不报告:探究健康志愿者在I期药物试验中披露不良事件的理由。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):82-90. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1469552.
8
Motivation for participating in phase 1 vaccine trials: Comparison of an influenza and an Ebola randomized controlled trial.参与 1 期疫苗试验的动机:流感和埃博拉随机对照试验的比较。
Vaccine. 2019 Jan 7;37(2):289-295. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
9
"My Body is One of the Best Commodities": Exploring the Ethics of Commodification in Phase I Healthy Volunteer Clinical Trials.“我的身体是最优质的商品之一”:探究I期健康志愿者临床试验中商品化的伦理问题
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2019;29(4):305-331. doi: 10.1353/ken.2019.0028.
10
Why healthy subjects volunteer for phase I studies and how they perceive their participation?为什么健康受试者会自愿参加I期研究,以及他们如何看待自己的参与?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;63(11):1085-94. doi: 10.1007/s00228-007-0368-3. Epub 2007 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Federal Policies to Reduce Economic Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment.评估联邦政策以减少临床试验入组的经济障碍。
J Law Med Ethics. 2025 May 23;53(2):1-10. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.61.
2
Participant Experience of Taking Part in Periodontal Experimental Studies.参与牙周实验研究的受试者体验
Int J Dent. 2024 Nov 27;2024:8888815. doi: 10.1155/ijod/8888815. eCollection 2024.
3
Mutual Emotional Labor as Method: Building Connections of Care in Qualitative Research.作为方法的相互情感劳动:在定性研究中建立关怀联系
Qual Rep. 2023 Nov;28(11):3192-3212. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6251.
4
Exploring the consent process among pregnant and breastfeeding women taking part in a maternal vaccine clinical trial in Kampala, Uganda: a qualitative study.探索乌干达坎帕拉参与母亲疫苗临床试验的孕妇和哺乳期妇女的同意过程:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 16;25(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01055-7.
5
Exclusion of Women from Phase I Trials: Perspectives from Investigators and Research Oversight Officials.将女性排除在 I 期临床试验之外:调查员和研究监督官员的观点。
Ethics Hum Res. 2023 Nov-Dec;45(6):19-30. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500170.
6
"Death and Taxes": Why Financial Compensation for Research Participants is an Economic and Legal Risk.“死亡和税收”:为什么研究参与者的经济补偿是一种经济和法律风险。
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(2):413-425. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.72. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
7
Volunteering for Infection: Participant Perspectives on a Hepatitis C Virus Controlled Human Infection Model.自愿感染:参与者对丙型肝炎病毒人工感染模型的看法。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 14;77(Suppl 3):S224-S230. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad350.
8
Telemedicine in Care of Sarcoma Patients beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities.新冠疫情后肉瘤患者护理中的远程医疗:挑战与机遇
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;15(14):3700. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143700.
9
Demographic diversity of US-based participants in GSK-sponsored interventional clinical trials.美国参与葛兰素史克赞助的介入性临床试验的参与者的人口统计学多样性。
Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;20(2):133-144. doi: 10.1177/17407745221149118. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
10
Sociodemographic and psychological characteristics influencing patients' willingness to participate in clinical trials.影响患者参与临床试验意愿的社会人口学和心理学特征。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Oct;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002044.

本文引用的文献

1
Sacrificial Labour: Social Inequality, Identity Work, and the Damaging Pursuit of Elusive Futures.牺牲性劳动:社会不平等、身份认同工作与对难以捉摸的未来的有害追求
Work Employ Soc. 2020 Jun;34(3):441-456. doi: 10.1177/0950017019885069. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
2
'Becoming-with' a repeat healthy volunteer: Managing and negotiating trust among repeat healthy volunteers in commercial clinical drug trials.与重复健康志愿者“共同存在”:在商业临床药物试验中管理和协商重复健康志愿者之间的信任。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112670. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112670. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
3
Informal professionalization of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials in Russia.俄罗斯I期临床试验中健康参与者的非正式专业化
Clin Trials. 2019 Dec;16(6):563-570. doi: 10.1177/1740774519877851. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
4
Research Payment and Its Social Justice Concerns.研究报酬及其社会正义问题。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Sep;19(9):35-36. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1630505.
5
Filthy Lucre or Fitting Offer? Understanding Worries About Payments to Research Participants.不义之财还是合理报酬?理解对向研究参与者支付报酬的担忧。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Sep;19(9):1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1631076.
6
The Continued Complexities of Paying Research Participants.支付研究参与者的持续复杂性。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Sep;19(9):5-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1643654.
7
The Exploitation of Professional "Guinea Pigs" in the Gig Economy: The Difficult Road From Consent to Justice.零工经济中对专业“实验对象”的剥削:从同意到正义的艰难之路
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Sep;19(9):37-39. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1630513.
8
"Paid to Endure": Paid Research Participation, Passivity, and the Goods of Work.“有偿忍受”:有偿研究参与、消极性与工作的好处。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Sep;19(9):11-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1630498.
9
Advancing Ethics and Policy for Healthy-Volunteer Research through a Model-Organism Framework.通过模式生物框架推进健康志愿者研究的伦理与政策
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Jan;41(1):4-14. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500001.
10
Captive to the Clinic: Phase I Clinical Trials as Temporal Total Institutions.受制于临床机构:作为时间性总体机构的一期临床试验
Sociol Inq. 2018 Nov;88(4):724-748. doi: 10.1111/soin.12228. Epub 2018 Apr 20.

I 期临床试验补偿:健康志愿者参与临床试验实际能挣多少?

Phase I trial compensation: How much do healthy volunteers actually earn from clinical trial enrollment?

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Wake Technical Community College, Raleigh, NC, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):477-487. doi: 10.1177/17407745211011069. Epub 2021 May 2.

DOI:10.1177/17407745211011069
PMID:33938244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8290991/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Financial compensation for research participation is a major focus of ethical concern regarding human subject recruitment. Phase I trials are sometimes considered to be a lucrative source of income for healthy volunteers, encouraging some people to become "professional guinea pigs." Yet, little is known about how much these clinical trials actually pay and how much healthy volunteers earn from them.

METHODS

As part of a mixed-methods, longitudinal study of healthy volunteers, we required participants to complete clinical trial diaries, or surveys that captured detailed information about screening and enrollment in Phase I trials. Over a 3-year period, participants provided information online or via telephone about each clinical trial for which they screened (e.g. the clinic name, the study's therapeutic area, the length of the trial, the number of nights spent in the clinic, and the study compensation), and whether they qualified for trial inclusion. Clinical trial diaries generated data about whether participants continued to screen for and enroll in clinical trials and how much money they earned from their participation.

RESULTS

131 participants routinely completed clinical trial diaries or confirmed that they had not screened for any new clinical trials. Together, these participants screened for 1001 clinical trials at 73 research facilities during a 3-year period. Overall, the median clinical trial compensation was US$3070 (range = US$150-US$13,000). Participants seeking new healthy volunteer trials tended to screen for three studies per year, participate in one or two studies, and earn roughly US$4000 annually. Participants who were unemployed earned the most income from clinical trials compared to those with full-time or part-time jobs, and those individuals whom we label "occupational" participants because of their persistent pursuit of clinical trials earned more than people who screened occasionally. Notably, the median annual trial compensation was well below US$10,000 for all employment groups, and most occupational healthy volunteers also earned less than US$10,000 each year. The 10% of participants who earned the most had a median annual income of US$18,885 from clinical trials, and there was significant volatility in these individuals' earnings from year to year.

CONCLUSION

Despite the perception that Phase I enrollment can generate significant earnings, it was exceedingly rare for anyone in this study to make more than US$20,000 in a single year, and unusual to earn even between US$10,000 and US$20,000. From an ethics perspective, individual trials might appear to unduly induce enrollment by offering significant sums of money, but given our findings, the larger problem for low-income participants may be the unrealistic perception that clinical trials alone could be a way of earning a living.

摘要

背景/目的:参与研究的经济补偿是涉及人体受试者招募的伦理关注的一个主要焦点。 Ⅰ 期试验有时被认为是健康志愿者收入丰厚的来源,这促使一些人成为“职业豚鼠”。 然而,对于这些临床试验实际支付的金额以及健康志愿者从中获得的收入却知之甚少。

方法

作为一项针对健康志愿者的混合方法、纵向研究的一部分,我们要求参与者完成临床试验日记,或调查,以获取有关Ⅰ 期试验筛选和入组的详细信息。 在 3 年的时间里,参与者通过在线或电话向我们提供了他们筛选的每一项临床试验的信息(例如诊所名称、研究的治疗领域、试验的长度、在诊所过夜的次数以及研究补偿),以及他们是否符合试验纳入标准。 临床试验日记生成了有关参与者是否继续筛选和参加临床试验以及从参与中获得多少收入的数据。

结果

131 名参与者定期完成临床试验日记或确认他们没有为任何新的临床试验进行筛选。 这些参与者在 3 年期间在 73 个研究机构共筛选了 1001 项临床试验。 总体而言,临床试验补偿中位数为 3070 美元(范围为 150-13000 美元)。 寻求新的健康志愿者试验的参与者平均每年筛选三项研究,参加一项或两项研究,每年收入约 4000 美元。 与全职或兼职工作的参与者相比,失业的参与者从临床试验中获得的收入最多,而我们由于持续追求临床试验而将其标记为“职业”参与者的那些人比偶尔筛选的人收入更高。 值得注意的是,对于所有就业群体而言,临床试验的中位数年度补偿都远低于 10000 美元,大多数职业健康志愿者每年的收入也低于 10000 美元。 收入最高的 10%的参与者的年收入中位数为 18885 美元,他们的收入在不同年份波动很大。

结论

尽管人们普遍认为参与Ⅰ 期试验可以带来可观的收入,但在这项研究中,几乎没有人在一年内赚到超过 20000 美元,甚至很少有人赚到 10000 至 20000 美元之间。 从伦理角度来看,个别试验可能通过提供巨额款项来不当诱导入组,但根据我们的发现,对于低收入参与者来说,更大的问题可能是一种不切实际的观念,即临床试验本身可能是一种谋生的方式。