Faust Andrew C, Schwaner Lauren, Thomas Drew, Sannapanei Shilpa, Feldman Mark
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Aug;57(4):448-454. doi: 10.1177/00185787211046854. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
Guidelines for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) recommend use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) administered by continuous IV infusion (CI). Although data suggest comparable outcomes with CI and IV push (IVP) dosing post-endoscopy, there are limited data to support IVP PPI as the pre-endoscopy regimen. To evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-managed protocol for reducing PPI CIs and substitution of PPI IVP dosing in hemodynamically stable patients with suspected acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) prior to endoscopic intervention. Retrospective study; Tertiary-care community teaching hospital; Hemodynamically stable adults with confirmed or suspected UGIB. Hemodynamic stability was defined as a systolic blood pressure >90 mmHg, heart rate <100 beats, mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg, and no requirement for vasopressors. : All iterations of treatment recommendations encouraged an initial pantoprazole 80 mg IVP dose. In the pre-intervention group, patients were then treated at the at the provider's discretion with the majority receiving CI pantoprazole. After implementation of the original protocol (), all hemodynamically stable patients were allowed 1 bag of CI pantoprazole (80 mg infused over 10 hours) before being transitioned by the pharmacist to pantoprazole 40 mg IVP every 12 hours. After internal analysis, the protocol was revised to allow patients to be immediately transitioned to IVP dosing without an initial CI (). Incidence of continued bleeding or re-bleeding within 7 days of initial PPI dose. A total of 325 patients were included across all 3 study phases. The median number of CI bags per patient was reduced from 4 pre-intervention, to 1.5 in phase I, and to 0 in phase II ( < .001). The primary endpoint of continued bleeding or re-bleeding within 7 days was similar across all 3 groups (5.0% vs 6.5% vs 5.2%, = .92). Mean intravenous pantoprazole costs were reduced by $21.73/patient. Movement toward preferential use of IVP PPI prior to endoscopy for hemodynamically stable patients with confirmed or suspected UGIBs resulted in similar rates of continued bleeding or re-bleeding and generated modest cost savings. These findings warrant further investigation.
急性上消化道出血(UGIB)指南推荐使用通过持续静脉输注(CI)给予的质子泵抑制剂(PPI)。尽管数据表明内镜检查后CI给药和静脉推注(IVP)给药的结果相当,但支持将IVP PPI作为内镜检查前治疗方案的数据有限。为了评估药师管理方案对减少PPI持续静脉输注以及在疑似急性上消化道出血(UGIB)的血流动力学稳定患者内镜干预前替代PPI静脉推注给药的影响。回顾性研究;三级医疗社区教学医院;确诊或疑似UGIB的血流动力学稳定的成年人。血流动力学稳定定义为收缩压>90 mmHg、心率<100次/分钟、平均动脉压>65 mmHg且无需使用血管升压药。所有治疗建议的迭代版本均鼓励初始静脉推注泮托拉唑80 mg剂量。在干预前组,患者随后由医疗服务提供者酌情治疗,大多数患者接受持续静脉输注泮托拉唑。在实施原始方案后,所有血流动力学稳定的患者在由药师转为每12小时静脉推注泮托拉唑40 mg之前,允许使用1袋持续静脉输注的泮托拉唑(80 mg在10小时内输注完毕)。经过内部分析,该方案修订为允许患者在无初始持续静脉输注的情况下立即转为静脉推注给药。初始PPI剂量后7天内持续出血或再出血的发生率。在所有3个研究阶段共纳入325例患者。每位患者持续静脉输注袋数的中位数从干预前的4袋减少至I期的1.5袋,II期减少至0袋(P<0.001)。所有3组7天内持续出血或再出血的主要终点相似(5.0%对6.5%对5.2%,P = 0.92)。每位患者静脉注射泮托拉唑的平均费用降低了21.73美元。对于确诊或疑似UGIB的血流动力学稳定患者,在内镜检查前倾向于使用静脉推注PPI,导致持续出血或再出血的发生率相似,并节省了适度成本。这些发现值得进一步研究。